Why do we have all these idiots jumping on Al Franken, over this one accusation?

blackascoal said:
With all due respect my friend, you spend a lot of time running from you.

The question you asked was "how am I more pro-woman than you are." The answer is because I vote for issues, policies, and politicians who support protection, equality, and empowerment of women. If you think that isn't true, I defy you to point that out.

By every measure, that proves my point. You have no challenge to that truth. What you do personally isn't the point. Surely you must know that.

If you truly support women, why do you vote for a party that does not? You are who you vote for.

The 8% of African-Americans who vote for republicans get all the respect that 8% deserve. You seem to believe that 8% should have a larger voice and get to lead. Why do you believe that?

Should Libertarians lead the right?
Click to expand...

I'm not running from it I just disagree that voting Democratic makes one more pro woman.

But for the sake of discussion let's say it does. On a local basis I've voted for the last four democratic mayors of SF and SF is a more liberal city than Atlanta. Locally, am I more pro-woman than you?
 
TweedledeeDUMB said:
Trumptards have always supported Douchebag Donald, first-and-foremost, due to the fact that he mistreats women. That makes him a true hero in their minds. The idea that he could ever harm a woman enough to lose Trumptard support is pure fantasy.
Click to expand...

Who are all these women who claimed Trump mistreats them?
 
blackascoal said:
Shouldn't women be the ones who decide how "sexually liberated" THEY want to be.

You're making my point again brother.
Click to expand...

He was speaking about the world. Same thing happened during Clinton's presidency when many in the world supposedly laughed at us because we cared about him having an affair.

I can't speak for European countries but it seems to me they have made their choice with the number of topless beaches they have, their more acceptance of affairs by their politicians etc. So they tend to view Americans as more prudish.
 
Somad said:
Al Franken couldn't walk out onto 5th Avenue and shoot somebody without losing the support of his base like Tump could.
Click to expand...

That statement really bugs you leftTards doesn't it? of course, being sexual predators is just fine as long as you apologize. MORON.
 
cawacko said:
I'm not running from it I just disagree that voting Democratic makes one more pro woman.

But for the sake of discussion let's say it does. On a local basis I've voted for the last four democratic mayors of SF and SF is a more liberal city than Atlanta. Locally, am I more pro-woman than you?
Click to expand...

platforms matter idiot



tell us all why your party seeks to keep womens issues off the platform
 
ThatOldMoron said:
The thing is, what Franken did was disrespectful and disgusting,
Click to expand...

...but its okay with you because he apologized. The woman he did things to would beg to disagree.

ThatOldMoron said:
while what Moore allegedly did is criminal.
Click to expand...

Allegedly?? All we have is a 40 year old specious claim. Has anyone sworn testimony under threat of perjury?

Of course not; in lying liberal land, alleged claims are far more credible than a PHOTO. Dunce.

ThatOldMoron said:
There is a difference, you know. I wonder if this will affect Franken's re-election chances.
Click to expand...

There is a difference..... Liberals are caught in the ACT, while Republicans are confronted with hearsay, innuendo and specious 40 year old claims that cannot be substantiated by facts.

You're too stupid and dishonest to comprehend the OBVIOUS.
 
LittleThingy said:
Unless we're to believe that party operatives are able to find Oscar-caliber actresses for these accusations, I find the accusers against both Moore & Franken to be extremely credible.
Click to expand...

That's because you're a dishonest dumbfuck. The causation against Franken are credible, he admitted to them and there's photos. Moore, nothing more than a bunch of 40 year old specious accusations intended to cause political harm.
 
cawacko said:
I'm not running from it I just disagree that voting Democratic makes one more pro woman.
Click to expand...

That is insane. :0)

Is that like voting for republicans makes one more pro-black than democrats? Insane.

But for the sake of discussion let's say it does. On a local basis I've voted for the last four democratic mayors of SF and SF is a more liberal city than Atlanta. Locally, am I more pro-woman than you?
Click to expand...

That is a serious stretch of the imagination my friend.

First, SF being more 'liberal' than Atlanta is based on ones perspective.

African American Segregation in San Francisco
http://www.foundsf.org/index.php?title=African_American_Segregation_in_San_Francisco

The Loneliness of Being Black in San Francisco
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/black-exodus-from-san-francisco.html

Black in San Francisco: Housing Discrimination, Racism, and Displacement
http://www.streetsheet.org/?p=3000

Maybe if you're a white, you might have a point.

Secondly, I don't live in San Francisco, nor would I want to .. so your voting where I don't live isn't the point either.

If I did live in SF, do you have any confusion about what party I would be voting for, or what issues I would support.

Nice try, bad stretch. :0)
 
Craig234 said:
It's a counter-attack over Roy Moore to protect their party's history of bad behavior and a distraction from their tax scam bill.
Click to expand...

tumblr_mm0szoeTzX1s4r51mo1_500.gif
 
blackascoal said:
That is insane. :0)

Is that like voting for republicans makes one more pro-black than democrats? Insane.



That is a serious stretch of the imagination my friend.

First, SF being more 'liberal' than Atlanta is based on ones perspective.

African American Segregation in San Francisco
http://www.foundsf.org/index.php?title=African_American_Segregation_in_San_Francisco

The Loneliness of Being Black in San Francisco
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/black-exodus-from-san-francisco.html

Black in San Francisco: Housing Discrimination, Racism, and Displacement
http://www.streetsheet.org/?p=3000

Maybe if you're a white, you might have a point.

Secondly, I don't live in San Francisco, nor would I want to .. so your voting where I don't live isn't the point either.

If I did live in SF, do you have any confusion about what party I would be voting for, or what issues I would support.

Nice try, bad stretch. :0)
Click to expand...

From a black perspective I do not disagree with you in any way that Atlanta is far better than SF.

From a liberal policy perspective SF is more progressive
 
blackascoal said:
With all due respect my friend, you spend a lot of time running from you.

The question you asked was "how am I more pro-woman than you are." The answer is because I vote for issues, policies, and politicians who support protection, equality, and empowerment of women. If you think that isn't true, I defy you to point that out.

If you truly support women, why do you vote for a party that does not? You are who you vote for.
Click to expand...
If you voted for Hillary that proves you don't vote on issues, policies nor for politicians who support protection, equality, and empowerment of women.
and that fact alone proves it.....
You must have missed the Comey testimony, Clapper lying to Congress under oath, the then AG covering for Democrats, etc....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top