Gloria Allred Refuses to Release Yearbook

Thing1 said:
Oh, really?

So, Moore is innocent then? 9 people are lying?

Take a stand, Darth.
Click to expand...

Every falsifiable claim has been debunked you laughable fuck, from the girl not having a phone in her room, to there being no police report or paper trail of any kind from the mall, to this lying cunt's refusal to provide the yearbook for inspection. The swamp is laughably transparent.
 
floridafan said:
And the 8 other women???????????????????
Click to expand...

I've watched the nutjobs at the women's marches and the SJW meltdowns, there is no doubt in my mind that you could find 8 women in that cesspool to lie, but the fact remains that every falsifiable claim has been debunked, from the girl not having a phone in her room, to there being no police report or paper trail of any kind from the mall, to this lying cunt's refusal to provide the yearbook for inspection. The swamp is laughably transparent.
 
floridafan said:
There are 8 other women who have come forward, its not about Allred.
Click to expand...

It’s in part about Allred.

She has no direct evidence of her client’s claim and part of it seems a little sketchy, to put it mildly. An objective observer would give a skeptical eye to the other accounts based on Allred and her client.

But objectivity has long since been tossed out the window, since you care about getting rid of Moore more than anything.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
also lied for political reasons.....
Click to expand...
To your kind everyone is a liar. I am sure even the associates of Moore who said that he spent lots of time at the mall chasing young girls, and the owners of the mall who banned him lied as well.
Defend him all you want, the polls tell us it aint looking good for him at all.
 
Darth Omar said:
It’s in part about Allred.

She has no direct evidence of her client’s claim and part of it seems a little sketchy, to put it mildly. An objective observer would give a skeptical eye to the other accounts based on Allred and her client.

But objectivity has long since been tossed out the window, since you care about getting rid of Moore more than anything.
Click to expand...

Its not about me, but 9 women and probably more to come. Allred already indicated that she has more proof to come. Just be patient.
 
Darth Omar said:
The comment itself seems pretty benign.

It still leaves the question of why she [or Allred] forged the DA stamp. She also failed to recall that Moore presided over her divorce hearing—-which he dismissed. You understand that’s a potential motive on her part, right?
Click to expand...

I'm talking about the handwriting, Darth. Everybody's talking about the "7s" and the "DA" but nobody wants to admit that the lower-case "Ys" and "Rs" are the same, both "M"s have a higher 2nd arch, the lower-case "Es" end with a sharp dash, the uppercase letters are proportionately larger than the lower case letters. The writing has to be taken as a whole.

Also, that's a lie about the divorce hearing. It's right from the case file.

"Nelson’s divorce attorney, Rodney Ward, still practices in Gadsden. He concurred with this attorney’s analysis of Nelson’s divorce case. “I reviewed my file, and there was no hearing set in front of Judge Moore,” Ward told me this morning. “Looking at a copy of the order, it looks like Moore didn’t sign it. It looks like it was stamped by his assistant.” Had Beverly Nelson known who the presiding judge was, Ward went on, “my client would have filed a motion to have the judge recuse himself, to have a different judge appointed. So I don’t even think she knew who the judge was. It was only, like, sixty days from the time the divorce was filed to the time it was dismissed. Maybe ninety.” Ward concluded, “If Moore is claiming that she appeared in front of him, I do not believe that’s true.”
 
Thing1 said:
You're the one being partisanly selective - not me.

I'm not on here defending any of the Democrats or lefties who have been accused - even going back to Clinton, whose accusers I believe. Yet you are selectively defending Moore.
Click to expand...

You're the one expecting others to see it your way. Simple as that.
 
floridafan said:
Tell us exactly what "proof" you would consider .
Click to expand...

How many angels dance on the head of a pin lol.

There’s excellent evidence some degree of forgery occurred with the year book. Oddly, that’s the only real evidence in this whole thing. The rest is he said/she said.
 
Darth Omar said:
How many angels dance on the head of a pin lol.

There’s excellent evidence some degree of forgery occurred with the year book. Oddly, that’s the only real evidence in this whole thing. The rest is he said/she said.
Click to expand...

You have never seen or touched the yearbook, but of course you know there is forgery. I wonder if these were your daughters, you would still be defending Moore.
 
floridafan said:
You have never seen or touched the yearbook, but of course you know there is forgery. I wonder if these were your daughters, you would still be defending Moore.
Click to expand...

The fact that they won't provide the yearbook for inspection despite being invited to provide a 2nd hand writing analyst of their own choosing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top