What's (Medically) Wrong With Trump?

Teflon Don said:
Oh no. Not a liberal female Senator from New York. How in the world could Trump contend with that?

It is so obvious that all of this from Weinstein to Franken was a set up to go after Trump, take out the Clintons and clear the field for someone like Gillebrand to run in 2020. There is ZERO chance anyone with a penis gets the democrat nomination in 2020.

I like Trump's chances against Gillebrand. But, hey you have a different opinion
Click to expand...

It's interesting that you, Grind & SF took my post about her very literally, and made it just about her. It's about her, but it's much more about her standing in the party & among women...it has definitely galvanized women on the issue of Trump's allegations. Again, this was a one-day news cycle type of story that Trump turned into at least a week & probably more by lashing out emotionally.

But I agree that Gillebrand will be a player in 2020. We don't know what the field would look like yet, but she'd be a good candidate, imo. I think her calling on Trump to resign was a clear indication that she's going to run, and I think she'd do well against him. Trump beat Hillary largely because of the epic & unprecedented baggage she brought to the race - KG would have none of that.
 
Thing1 said:
I still don't think it's a great idea for Trump to keep the allegations against him in the headlines even longer, particularly w/ a tweet many perceive as sexist.

But, of course, I respect your opinion on the matter and find your input thought provoking.
Click to expand...

Well, considering you question EVERYTHING he does and don't give him credit for ANYTHING. But, up until now his instincts have been good.

With regards to your comment that "the landscape has changed", no it hasn't. It is obvious to anyone paying attention that this is all a setup. I remember distinctly asking when the Weinstein thing broke "why now?". There are never any coincidences. Well, now we know the "why now".

This has been one big coordinated effort to go after Trump. Plain and simple. They didn't get him with Access Hollywood so now they are using another angle. The democrat party only has one tune they know how to play and that is the WAR ON WOMEN.
 
Thing1 said:
It's interesting that you, Grind & SF took my post about her very literally, and made it just about her. It's about her, but it's much more about her standing in the party & among women...it has definitely galvanized women on the issue of Trump's allegations. Again, this was a one-day news cycle type of story that Trump turned into at least a week & probably more by lashing out emotionally.

But I agree that Gillebrand will be a player in 2020. We don't know what the field would look like yet, but she'd be a good candidate, imo. I think her calling on Trump to resign was a clear indication that she's going to run, and I think she'd do well against him. Trump beat Hillary largely because of the epic & unprecedented baggage she brought to the race - KG would have none of that.
Click to expand...

So now you are bitching for us commenting on what you actually said? That is a new low even for you. You are the one saying he would be making a mistake taking her on. We responded, now you are saying "don't take me literally". Maybe you should be more clear next time.

Gillebrand has been running for a while. She and Kamala Harris. Your democrat party is all about identity politics. They have already elected a half negro, so Booker can count himself out. And apparently it isn't time for a wetback. So they will 100% nominate a woman again.

But, I agree with you, nominating another liberal female Senator from New York will be a winning strategy. Gillebrand would probably pick up 10 red states dontcha think?
 
America has spoken, get used to Trump until 2024.

And find some ideas, or way forward by 2024 too, or we real Americans will roll over you again like the roadkill you are at present
 
tenor.gif
 
what is all the hubbub over Trumps tweet about good ole Kirsten?

I read it twice. You really have to stretch things to be offended about it
 
katzgar said:
I know how much you right wing types hate smart people.
Click to expand...

So true.

I mean, the mere idea that someone intelligent could be a match for Trump's goofy, repetitive insults. What was I thinking?

All Trump has to do is start calling her "Little Kirsten" and it's practically over. He's too formidable.
 
Thing1 said:
So true.

I mean, the mere idea that someone intelligent could be a match for Trump's goofy, repetitive insults. What was I thinking?

All Trump has to do is start calling her "Little Kirsten" and it's practically over. He's too formidable.
Click to expand...


what he is is a sleazy scum bag
 
Thing1 said:
So true.

I mean, the mere idea that someone intelligent could be a match for Trump's goofy, repetitive insults. What was I thinking?

All Trump has to do is start calling her "Little Kirsten" and it's practically over. He's too formidable.
Click to expand...

you joke but this is largely true
 
Micawber said:
We should have a trump is impeached or resignation party thread in advance. You know the Trumptards will all flee when it happens. Can't taunt them when they are gone.

Consider all my posts taunting Repukes on spec. We won. You lost. Trump is gone! Eat shit!
Click to expand...

I can't wait for you to perform a mega flounce when it all turns to shit.
 
Thing1 said:
Trump is making a mistake taking on Gillibrand; she's way too smart for him.

And, once again, he's going to keep his own scandal in the headlines.
Click to expand...

Thing1 said:
It's interesting that you, Grind & SF took my post about her very literally, and made it just about her. It's about her, but it's much more about her standing in the party & among women...it has definitely galvanized women on the issue of Trump's allegations. Again, this was a one-day news cycle type of story that Trump turned into at least a week & probably more by lashing out emotionally.

But I agree that Gillebrand will be a player in 2020. We don't know what the field would look like yet, but she'd be a good candidate, imo. I think her calling on Trump to resign was a clear indication that she's going to run, and I think she'd do well against him. Trump beat Hillary largely because of the epic & unprecedented baggage she brought to the race - KG would have none of that.
Click to expand...

Yeah...what were we thinking? I mean, gee golly who could possibly think your post was about her?

Especially when you go on in the follow up to talk predominantly about... HER.

What exactly has Gillebrand done? What makes her Presidential material? I get the past three have had little experience and aren't examples of even average Presidents... but how is she any different? What has she accomplished?
 
What's wrong with Trump. He has some obsessive mental issues that mine couldn't touch. If mine needed clinical help, than what the hell is he doing as president? One thing boggled my mind. Hearing Trump won't eat out of a package that has been opened. He has to open a new package, even if he was the one that opened the last one. I thought I was bad with some things. It nice to know I wasn't as bad as I thought, but I'm pretty iffy on the idea of giving someone that is, one of the biggest jobs in the world, that can effect so many. Let's be real, and give this loon a job at 7 11, like his skill set demands.
 
Thing1 said:
It's interesting that you, Grind & SF took my post about her very literally, and made it just about her. It's about her, but it's much more about her standing in the party & among women...it has definitely galvanized women on the issue of Trump's allegations. Again, this was a one-day news cycle type of story that Trump turned into at least a week & probably more by lashing out emotionally.

But I agree that Gillebrand will be a player in 2020. We don't know what the field would look like yet, but she'd be a good candidate, imo. I think her calling on Trump to resign was a clear indication that she's going to run, and I think she'd do well against him. Trump beat Hillary largely because of the epic & unprecedented baggage she brought to the race - KG would have none of that.
Click to expand...

A dead tree could beat Trump in 2020
 
Obese fatass Trump needs to eat more big macs and more diet cokes, clog those arteries the fuck up. I'll fucking pay for it, let's all send the fatty-in-chief some big macs.
 
NOVA said:
It seems you thrive on the lunatic left conspiracy theories.......insane conclusions drawn from ridiculous and somewhat crazy accusations....
dementia because of someone's opinion that he used to be a better speaker ?
a diagnosis of syphilis just pulled out of this air ?
speculation about is mental state because of opinions about his ego....
hair loss medication side effects from something you can't possibly know he even uses at all,....let alone the brand or effects of this imaginary medication....

can a sane person even entertain this kind of lunatic attack on a person ?
Click to expand...

You're making this comment after all the con lies that Hillary has Parkinson's, seizures, incontinence and everything else?

Talk about insane attacks on a person.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top