Which is worse: Russian interference or FBI/CIA/IRS interference?

You fucktards made the accusation. I’m waiting to see what bizarre shit you pull out if your ass.

CNN has also learned that Strzok was the FBI official who signed the document officially opening an investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to sources familiar with the matter. As the No. 2 official in counterintelligence, Strzok was considered to be one of the bureau's top experts on Russia.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html

But the president’s defenders are off base when they try read conspiracy into Peter Strzok’s “insurance policy” message. Talking about Trump’s chances in August 2016, here’s what Strzok wrote:

I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office [Andrew McCabe is the FBI deputy director and married to a Democratic Virginia State Senate candidate] for that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 …


https://www.lawfareblog.com/peter-strzoks-insurance-policy
 
Even the liberals who are white Christians? Man, you really are a freaking dumb backwoods hillbilly. Your posts make absolutely zero sense and you don't even realize it. Keep posting your blather and drivel. You just continue to prove my point that you don't have the mental capacity to post cogent, lucid messages.

redneckthumbsup.jpg

Why do you support Clinton's overt collusion with the FSB you treasonous POS?
 
Even the liberals who are white Christians? Man, you really are a freaking dumb backwoods hillbilly. Your posts make absolutely zero sense and you don't even realize it. Keep posting your blather and drivel. You just continue to prove my point that you don't have the mental capacity to post cogent, lucid messages.

redneckthumbsup.jpg

Stop pretending you don't hate White Christians. It's the only plank you have left in your party.
 
Isn't it though?

CNN has also learned that Strzok was the FBI official who signed the document officially opening an investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election, according to sources familiar with the matter. As the No. 2 official in counterintelligence, Strzok was considered to be one of the bureau's top experts on Russia.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politics/peter-strzok-james-comey/index.html

But the president’s defenders are off base when they try read conspiracy into Peter Strzok’s “insurance policy” message. Talking about Trump’s chances in August 2016, here’s what Strzok wrote:

I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office [Andrew McCabe is the FBI deputy director and married to a Democratic Virginia State Senate candidate] for that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 …


https://www.lawfareblog.com/peter-strzoks-insurance-policy

Thank you for proving my point by admitting the “president’s defenders are off base”.

More from your article, illiterate.

“Give me a break. Read the text again.

Strzok was reacting to the argument that there was no point getting worked up because Trump was bound to lose. He argued in response that the odds against a Trump victory offered no reason to be complacent and gave an example: The odds are also very much against you dying before the age of 40, but you probably bought insurance at that age because dying with a young family would be such a disaster; the expense is reasonable even if the event is unlikely. For the same reason, in Strzok’s view, horror at the prospect of a Trump presidency is reasonable even though the prospect is remote.”
 
your party backed a russian plant


after backing a guy who lied us into a war and crashed the entire world economy


and Nixon


you republicans have no reputation left worth presenting
 
Thank you for proving my point by admitting the “president’s defenders are off base”.

More from your article, illiterate.

“Give me a break. Read the text again.

Strzok was reacting to the argument that there was no point getting worked up because Trump was bound to lose. He argued in response that the odds against a Trump victory offered no reason to be complacent and gave an example: The odds are also very much against you dying before the age of 40, but you probably bought insurance at that age because dying with a young family would be such a disaster; the expense is reasonable even if the event is unlikely. For the same reason, in Strzok’s view, horror at the prospect of a Trump presidency is reasonable even though the prospect is remote.”

There was no reason to get worked up because he implemented his fascist insurance policy you disgusting pig:

I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office [Andrew McCabe is the FBI deputy director and married to a Democratic Virginia State Senate candidate] for that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 …

Your fascist entrenched bureacratic deepstate ongoing coup attempt is exposed for all to see, we will have this scum hung in the public square before this is over.
 
Gasp! As a senior counterintelligence officer with particular expertise in Russia, you mean he was actually DOING HIS JOB?

His job was to create politically motivated "insurance polices" in case the plebian voters didn't vote the way he wanted them to? Fascist pig.
 
fox is trash


they have no reputation left to ruin idiot

You're thinking of the majority of the MSM which acts as the DNC ministry of propaganda.

Here's one from Dana Millbank of WaPo in which he requests oppo research from the DNC:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/22603

And proceeds to publish it verbatim in this article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...a5aed7958dc_story.html?utm_term=.202c7c9ee801

Here's one from Donna Brazille of CNN and the NYTs showing that CNN gave Clinton the debate questions in advance:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38478

Here's one showing that a Politico reporter sent his article to the Clinton campaign for approval:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808
 
There was no reason to get worked up because he implemented his fascist insurance policy you disgusting pig:

I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office [Andrew McCabe is the FBI deputy director and married to a Democratic Virginia State Senate candidate] for that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 …

Your fascist entrenched bureacratic deepstate ongoing coup attempt is exposed for all to see, we will have this scum hung in the public square before this is over.

kbTzYqx7Px-10.png
 
You're thinking of the majority of the MSM which acts as the DNC ministry of propaganda.

Here's one from Dana Millbank of WaPo in which he requests oppo research from the DNC:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/22603

And proceeds to publish it verbatim in this article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...a5aed7958dc_story.html?utm_term=.202c7c9ee801

Here's one from Donna Brazille of CNN and the NYTs showing that CNN gave Clinton the debate questions in advance:

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38478

Here's one showing that a Politico reporter sent his article to the Clinton campaign for approval:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808

These Liberals can't comprehend anything unless Rachel Maddow spoon feeds it to them.

Because of their liberal blinders ... they are literally incapable of reading anything outside of their own racist, bigoted liberal bubbles .
 
Back
Top