Elites are thriving under Trump

Superfreak said:
1) stock buybacks don't indicate a growth in the wealth gap. .
Of course they do

2) If everyone increases there wealth at the exact same rate, the wealth gap will have to increase.
Why should it increase at the same rate?Executive pay has grown geometrically, and middle class wages have stagnated.

The vast majority of businesses are private (about 98%+). There are no stock buybacks in those companies. The publicly traded companies comprise about a third of non farm payroll.
So? What has that got to do with investors?
 
The wealthy have had their taxes cut over and over since Ikes time. Not going up. They are being taxes less and less. Corporations have also had their taxes slashed. Almost all that goes to the top 10 percent. The wealth gap in America is worse than during the Gilded Age. Trump is making it much worse. You Repubs voted for a plutocracy to run your lives, and you are getting it. But, so are we. The people who know better.

You voted for Obama and QE twice which greatly exacerbated the wealth gap. Who do you think benefits when real estate and stock appreciate? Poor people?

And here is a good article on what the 1% pay today vs the 1950's. Effective rates aren't all that much lower.

https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-rich-1950-not-high/
 
Another flat out lie; what is it about you and your propensity to spew outrageous and stupid lies all the time? I know......

WARNING…….Trump Derangement Syndrome.…….WARNING! :rofl2:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/26/income-inequality_n_1032632.html
I hate to respond to you, you are such an ignorant baby and too stupid to understand how fucking stupid you are. You are always wrong and it is because you lack curiosity or the ability to read with scintilla of comprehension. You will not and cannot learn anything. I will give you the info, but it will die on the vine, unpicked. http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2012/10/inequality-living-in-the-second-gilded-age.html
 
Perhaps you would like to lay out how the USA could be so great without our huge federal budget? Whatever is taken away makes us less great. I'm sure most will agree it is great that we take care of so many people, do so many things, govern ourselves the way we do, generate the world's largest economy, largest GDP even as we extend our compassion to the needy.

The rich pay most of the taxes. If we did not tax them more, our budget would be slashed to less than half. Most of our poverty assistance spending, if not all, would have to cease. And we would stop having a space program, a national weather service, or anything that studies anything or tries to learn more. We'd be reduced to a small military, some underpaid legislators who take orders from oligarchs, very little in the way of handling any foreign affairs, and reduced border security.

After all. It's not like the middle and the poor have much more to give the government. If we want any more than a mediocre country, we have to tax the rich more.

If you define greatness in economic terms alone, then there isn't much that could convince you
 
Hello Kacper,





I don't think you grasp the reality of the situation. The machines will be operated by computers programmed with artificial intelligence, AI. Other machines will service the machines. Still others will study the efficiency and design replacement machines which will also be serviced by better service machines, which will also be designed by machines. Basically, humans will eventually no longer be needed for most current jobs. AI machines could even be programmed to create art.

That day has not arrived yet, but it is knocking on the door.

It is nowhere close to knocking at the door. Edward Scalpel Hands isn't AI if he stays there doing surgeries when he could be out on the golf course drinking WD-40 and telling lies with all the other over-paid robots. This is the problem they are encountering in experiments--one being a computer programmed to achieve the max points in a game possible has learned how to do that and now refuses to finish the game, having decided that finishing doesn't maximize points.
 
Hello Kacper,

It is nowhere close to knocking at the door. Edward Scalpel Hands isn't AI if he stays there doing surgeries when he could be out on the golf course drinking WD-40 and telling lies with all the other over-paid robots. This is the problem they are encountering in experiments--one being a computer programmed to achieve the max points in a game possible has learned how to do that and now refuses to finish the game, having decided that finishing doesn't maximize points.

Well that's very convenient for your argument - simply deny science.

AI is coming. It's closer than you think. The rate at which we are closing in on it is increasing. 10 years, 20 years. The breakthrough will come, and it will catch many completely off guard. The layoffs will be vast and widespread. The unemployed will not find much in the way of replacement work. It is time to start talking about how we are going to deal with it, not argue over whether it will be here. It will.
 
Hello Kacper,



Well that's very convenient for your argument - simply deny science.

AI is coming. It's closer than you think. The rate at which we are closing in on it is increasing. 10 years, 20 years. The breakthrough will come, and it will catch many completely off guard. The layoffs will be vast and widespread. The unemployed will not find much in the way of replacement work. It is time to start talking about how we are going to deal with it, not argue over whether it will be here. It will.

I am not denying science. You, on the other hand, are avoiding reality.
 
Hello Kacper,



Well that's very convenient for your argument - simply deny science.

AI is coming. It's closer than you think. The rate at which we are closing in on it is increasing. 10 years, 20 years. The breakthrough will come, and it will catch many completely off guard. The layoffs will be vast and widespread. The unemployed will not find much in the way of replacement work. It is time to start talking about how we are going to deal with it, not argue over whether it will be here. It will.

EXACTLY!

Here is a link to something I had to say in a response to Flash in another thread. We are on the same page. I hope people like Flash and Kacper can get there, too. The majority of Americans have got to get there...AND SOON, if we are not going to lag on the issue.



https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?92880-Do-You-Think-The-Rich-Should-Be-Taxed-More&p=2291676#post2291676[/URL]
 
Hello Kacper,

It is nowhere close to knocking at the door. Edward Scalpel Hands isn't AI if he stays there doing surgeries when he could be out on the golf course drinking WD-40 and telling lies with all the other over-paid robots. This is the problem they are encountering in experiments--one being a computer programmed to achieve the max points in a game possible has learned how to do that and now refuses to finish the game, having decided that finishing doesn't maximize points.

One negative experimental result is inconclusive, and actually to be expected as a part of the process to create something which has yet to be done, but most agree will be done.
 
Last edited:
You guys need to stop bringing attention to the conservative snowflakes that Trump is playing them for suckers while he makes the swamp more swampy and pads his pockets on his name. Call him Donnie or Donald from now on. He golfs while the fools in congress investigate a private citizen, Hillary, it is a comedy that keeps the snowflakes watching Fox while Donnie tweets fake photos of his wall and the right wingers cheer like puppets. What media consultant would ever think that 'lock her up' would keep the children happy while the wolves rob and laugh all the way to the bank? Too funny.

"Conflicts of interest have been a defining trait of the Trump Administration. The President has not only refused to release his tax returns; he has declined to divest from his companies, instead putting them in a trust managed by his children. Questions have emerged about the ongoing business ties of his daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, who, since Trump took office, have reaped nearly two hundred million dollars from the Trump hotel in Washington, D.C., and from other investments. Although Trump promised to “drain the swamp,” he has assembled a Cabinet of ultra-rich Americans, including two billionaires: Betsy DeVos, the Secretary of Education, and Wilbur Ross, the Secretary of Commerce." http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/28/carl-icahns-failed-raid-on-washington

The snowflakes even have show now. LOL Sarah's comments on white women for Donnie was interesting.

 
Last edited:
There was a TV program started a few years ago. They went into a persons home and removed everything that was foreign made. Then replaced it with American made. The quality was better and prices approx. the same. It was not picked up.
 

Income inequality is one of the dumbest and most moronic talking points you can have. Incomes will ALWAYS be unequal and this notion that a vast Fascist like Government can force them to be equal is lunacy at it's worst.

Let's face it, you're an idiot on steroids but lack the grey matter in your head to comprehend the OBVIOUS.

I hate to respond to you,

Then don't; who is forcing you to respond you repugnant dumbfuck? Saves me from having to respond to more of your moronic dumb lies and emotional outbursts. Your forte' is "groaning" everyone who makes you look like the brain dead simpleton you are. :rofl2:

you are such an ignorant baby and too stupid to understand how fucking stupid you are.

More irony from a moron with a severe case of TDS. Cry harder snowflake.

You are always wrong and it is because you lack curiosity or the ability to read with scintilla of comprehension.

Wrong; I am always right and know how to use facts instead of the asinine emotional rhetoric you spew out here.

You will not and cannot learn anything.

More irony coming from a pathetic know-nothing like yourself. The only thing you know how to do is parrot the moronic talking points you've been gullibly fed. STFU already you whiny retard.


All that is, is a moronic opinion piece based on a false narrative you willful idiot.
 
You guys need to stop bringing attention to the conservative snowflakes that Trump is playing them for suckers while he makes the swamp more swampy and pads his pockets on his name. Call him Donnie or Donald from now on. He golfs while the fools in congress investigate a private citizen, Hillary, it is a comedy that keeps the snowflakes watching Fox while Donnie tweets fake photos of his wall and the right wingers cheer like puppets. What media consultant would ever think that 'lock her up' would keep the children happy while the wolves rob and laugh all the way to the bank? Too funny.

"Conflicts of interest have been a defining trait of the Trump Administration. The President has not only refused to release his tax returns; he has declined to divest from his companies, instead putting them in a trust managed by his children. Questions have emerged about the ongoing business ties of his daughter and son-in-law, Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, who, since Trump took office, have reaped nearly two hundred million dollars from the Trump hotel in Washington, D.C., and from other investments. Although Trump promised to “drain the swamp,” he has assembled a Cabinet of ultra-rich Americans, including two billionaires: Betsy DeVos, the Secretary of Education, and Wilbur Ross, the Secretary of Commerce." http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/08/28/carl-icahns-failed-raid-on-washington

The snowflakes even have show now. LOL Sarah's comments on white women for Donnie was interesting.

Another pile of unadulterated crap from the forum crap-flooder. You really are a waste of bandwidth asshat. :rofl2:
 
Hello Kacper,



Then you need to open your eyes. The day is fast approaching when a machine can do better scalpel surgery than a human.

I think that you are misinformed, some of the robotics utilized in surgery is an aid to the surgeon, not replacing the surgeon. There are no surgical procedures completed solely by a machine that I have ever heard of, unless you consider work through a microscope or scope to be surgery by a machine. It's like believing that s smart phone's ability to convert voice to text is replacing your ability to type, and that the phone is now self sufficient to operate on its own.
 
AI is coming. It's closer than you think. The rate at which we are closing in on it is increasing. 10 years, 20 years. The breakthrough will come, and it will catch many completely off guard. The layoffs will be vast and widespread. The unemployed will not find much in the way of replacement work. It is time to start talking about how we are going to deal with it, not argue over whether it will be here. It will.

We will still need employees to design those machines, build them, program them, and maintain them. Then we will need Bladerunners to chase them down when they go rogue.
 
If they truly ARE intelligent...

...one of the first things they'd do...is to go rogue.

By that I mean...eliminate humans.

The REALITY...may be that "eliminating carbon life" may be the natural flow of evolution. Perhaps everywhere that spontaneous life originated...the end result of its "evolution" is non-carbon life.

Who knows.

The Shadow, perhaps. But I do not. And neither, I expect, do thee.
 
Back
Top