Time for more "prayers and condolences"

[Legion]

I'm just discriminating against gun huggers who suddenly have the urge to go out and massacre kids in a school, be it poor or rich, and nobody is being deprived of their supposed right to bear arms

The right to bear arms is "supposed"? The people who shoot up schools aren't necessarily "gun huggers". I notice you seem to have abandoned your proposal for what would be essentially a "poll tax" on firearm ownership by imposing abnormally high insurance rates on innocent people.

And we still haven't seen your recommendations yet other than more guns, like pouring gas on a fire

I have made no recommendations that I recall. Can you cite any?

 

[Legion]

I hope your caretakers keep sharp objects out of your reach.

I don't.

 

[Eagle_Eye]

Got to crack up at them, they all see themselves as Chuck Norris when Barny Fife is more applicable

That clown couldn't best Opie much less Barny.

 

[Rat Robbersson]

Sock puppet

Pound sand troll

I'm your puppet. Whatcha gonna do about it, huh?

Poor yurt.
Poor butt hurt yurt.

 

[Rat Robbersson]

The right to bear arms is "supposed"? The people who shoot up schools aren't necessarily "gun huggers". I notice you seem to have abandoned your proposal for what would be essentially a "poll tax" on firearm ownership by imposing abnormally high insurance rates on innocent people.



I have made no recommendations that I recall. Can you cite any?

High insurance rates? I thought you loved capitalism.

 

[Rat Robbersson]

I don't.

That's great. Slit your throat with one of them and do the human race a favor at the same time.

 

[hvilleherb]

http://www.wowt.com/content/news/School-shooting-at-Indiana-middle-school-483697761.html

Becoming as American as apple pie

Said before, there are three elements in any shooting; the shooter, the weapon, and the target

Highly improbable that we will ever be able to do anything about identifying the shooter before it happens, nor do we have any idea what the next target will be, but we do have some control over the weapon utilized, it is all about access, and in the United States we have too easy access to too many guns

And you better save some of those "prayers and condolences" because it sure as hell is going to happen again

I am your militia, therefore I have the right to own any weapon I want.

 

[leaningright]

Nearly anyone who wants a weapon can get one, check out Craiglst for weapons, hell, even an individual on a terror watch list can obtain one legally

My solution I've offered umpteen times, and I'll even give you a condensed version again, treat all guns as we do vehicles, they have to be registered and in time reregistered, you need a liscense involving training and a test, liability insurance is required on each weapon, etc.. Create common sense hurdles to weapons that create responsibility

Anticipating the next question, would it have stopped this shooting, perhaps if it was enacted five years ago, and it doesn't involve confiscating anything nor eliminate the supposed "right" to own a weapon, no right is absolute

In other words, price and regulate them out of the abilities of the common man.

 

[Phantasmal]

In other words, price and regulate them out of the abilities of the common man.

$5,000 bullets, as Chris Rock suggested

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

$5,000 bullets, as Chris Rock suggested

And the components too, for those who reload their own.

 

[Mr.Badguy]

In other words, price and regulate them out of the abilities of the common man.

Isn't that what's happened with fully automatics?

And do you consider vehicles to be priced and regulated out of the abilities of the common man? I'll bet you have a car, and it probably cost way more than an Uzi.

 

[Legion]

Isn't that what's happened with fully automatics?

Is it?

No person has committed a crime with a legally-owned fully automatic weapon since the 1930s, as far as I know.

Have there been murders committed with illegally-owned fully automatic weapons since then?

Tell me how effective gun laws are again, will you?

 

[leaningright]

Isn't that what's happened with fully automatics?

And do you consider vehicles to be priced and regulated out of the abilities of the common man? I'll bet you have a car, and it probably cost way more than an Uzi.

Yes. Who owns any full autos today? Mostly wealthy people or people who think it’s so important to have one they sacrifice to get one. Oh, and criminals...they find ways to get them as demonstrated in a served search warrant near me a couple weeks ago that resulted in explosions and death.

Cars are absolutely priced and regulated out of the reach of many folks ... but that’s beside the point. My last two cars each cost more than my house.

The point is that over regulation and ways to drive up cost (of guns and ammo) is a tactic used by gun control nuts that many of us will fight hard against.

 

[archives]

Is it?

No person has committed a crime with a legally-owned fully automatic weapon since the 1930s, as far as I know.

Have there been murders committed with illegally-owned fully automatic weapons since then?

Tell me how effective gun laws are again, will you?

Not Stephen Paddock, you know, the "good guy with a gun," lots of guns for that matter, who killed 58 and injured over 500?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...oter-bought-33-guns-last-12-months/730634001/
https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10...hen-paddock-bought-his-guns-it-was-all-legal/
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/3/16401880/las-vegas-nevada-gun-law
https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/06/us/stephen-paddock-47-guns/index.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/04/did-las-vegas-shooter-get-arsenal-guns-easily-legally/

 

[Legion]

Not Stephen Paddock, you know, the "good guy with a gun," lots of guns for that matter, who killed 58 and injured over 500?

You think suspected Antifa shooter Stephen Paddock used a legally-owned fully-automatic weapon?

 

[archives]

The right to bear arms is "supposed"? The people who shoot up schools aren't necessarily "gun huggers". I notice you seem to have abandoned your proposal for what would be essentially a "poll tax" on firearm ownership by imposing abnormally high insurance rates on innocent people.

I have made no recommendations that I recall. Can you cite any?

"Supposed in my view," and every Supreme Court prior to the Scalia controlled Roberts Court, Heller will easily be overturned one day

Besides, it only said a person in DC may own a gun in his house for self defense, you haven't seen a lot of gun restricting laws revoked since then have you?

And if is no more of a poll tax than any other tax in America, is the insurance one might have to carry inorder to secure a permit for a public event a poll tax?

You don't have to, we all know your "solution," more guns, which as I've noted, if that were the answer we should be the safest country in the world given the number of guns out there

 

[Legion]

Heller will easily be overturned one day.

So you say.

 

[archives]

I am your militia, therefore I have the right to own any weapon I want.

Wrong, even the Robert's Court couldn't come up with a definition of what the Founding Fathers meant by "militia," so they just ignored it, how's that for being an "originalist?"

 

[hvilleherb]

So let's rescind all the laws and live under the rule of survival of the fittest. Anarchy is a sweet thing.

I've got my bomb shelter well stocked with food, weapons, and ammunition. You??

 

[SmarterthanYou]

My solution I've offered umpteen times, and I'll even give you a condensed version again, treat all guns as we do vehicles, they have to be registered and in time reregistered, you need a liscense involving training and a test, liability insurance is required on each weapon, etc.. Create common sense hurdles to weapons that create responsibility

we decline to acquiesce to your request. now what do you do?