Sarah Huckabee Sanders Kicked Out of Virginia Eatery

Legion said:
The county went for Trump by a yuge margin in 2016, so...

vg42mi8pys511.png
Click to expand...

It has to be tiring for her, to insure that she's only serving the 37.6% that voted in the manner she approved of. :palm:

Maybe she has a voter registration book to help her in deciding who's acceptable and who isn't.
 
According to some of you on here a cop can shoot a black man or child on sight because that person was a thug and somehow deserved death yet Sanders can spew her lies, defend her lying ass boss and his hateful bullshit, and in all ways exhibit thuggish behavior...but should not only be allowed to continue her "job" but be allowed to walk around like a normal citizen and enjoy normal things like sitting in a restaurant where she isn't wanted and should never be held accountable for her thug like behavior. Not by business owners, not by the media and not by a bullet from a cop's gun.

Fucking hypocrites.
 
christiefan915 said:
What does Obama have to do with anything, Prager apologist?
Click to expand...

The fact is that your "authority" served in the Obama Administration, fallacious one.

If Pastor PiMP had claimed the Shaubster was "appointed" by Obama, you'd have a point.

Since he stated - correctly - that the Shaubmeister served the Obama as an ethics attorney, you don't.
 
Legion said:
You posted an appeal to authority yesterday, and today you posted an ad hom. :D
Click to expand...

Keep calling it an appeal to authority, your reliance on that mischaracterization is amusing. Also amusing is the fact that you are staying away from this: :cool:

"Opening sentences of 5 CFR 2635.702 cover both; 702(a) gives example of coercion; 702(c) gives example of endorsement. Also 2635.101(b)(8) bars preferential treatment, with obvious corollary for singling out. She can lob attacks on her own time but not using her official position."
 
Gotcha68 said:
According to some of you on here a cop can shoot a black man or child on sight because that person was a thug and somehow deserved death yet Sanders can spew her lies, defend her lying ass boss and his hateful bullshit, and in all ways exhibit thuggish behavior...but should not only be allowed to continue her "job" but be allowed to walk around like a normal citizen and enjoy normal things like sitting in a restaurant where she isn't wanted and should never be held accountable for her thug like behavior. Not by business owners, not by the media and not by a bullet from a cop's gun.

Fucking hypocrites.
Click to expand...

OH, please show where anyone on here has suggested that "a cop can shoot a black man or child on sight because that person was a thug and somehow deserved death yet"; because without you providing that, the rest of your rant is just you whining.
 
christiefan915 said:
I posted this yesterday. You are the one who went to ad hom. Why haven't you commented on what he cited? 5 CFR 2635.702 covers both; 702(a) gives example of coercion; 702(c) gives example of endorsement. Also 2635.101(b)(8)


​
Click to expand...

I said she violated none of those things. You can't even explain how she did. Even staub had to make things up, like well, the corollary.....

I have repeatedly said she merely commented on what happened. If she was asked about this at a press conference, she would say the same. And you would whine she can't talk about it at a press conference.

All she did was respond to an event that has made news. She broke no ethics and you still have zero rebuttal to the fact she was asked to leave not for personal reasons, but for her profession and her politics.

You do that all the time, you just ignore anything that shows you could be or are wrong.
 
Legion said:
The fact is that your "authority" served in the Obama Administration, fallacious one.

If Pastor PiMP had claimed the Shaubster was "appointed" by Obama, you'd have a point.

Since he stated - correctly - that the Shaubmeister served the Obama as an ethics attorney, you don't.
Click to expand...

What does that have to do with Prager?

The pastor wrote "he was an ethics attorney to the Obama administration.......therefore, he wasn't very good at ethics......"

He disregarded that Shaub served under the bush admin starting in 2006 and wasn't appointed as Ethics Director until 2013. He left in 2017 because he was alarmed by trump's ethics breaches. I say that the man served in the office for 11 years and had no problems until he clashed with the grifter-in-chief.

Pmp is being dishonest, but you knew that.
 
Yaya said:
I said she violated none of those things. You can't even explain how she did. Even staub had to make things up, like well, the corollary.....

I have repeatedly said she merely commented on what happened. If she was asked about this at a press conference, she would say the same. And you would whine she can't talk about it at a press conference.

All she did was respond to an event that has made news. She broke no ethics and you still have zero rebuttal to the fact she was asked to leave not for personal reasons, but for her profession and her politics.

You do that all the time, you just ignore anything that shows you could be or are wrong.
Click to expand...

:rofl2: Y O U say she violated none of those things? What makes you an ethics expert? Why don't you explain in detail why Shaub is wrong... keeping in mind he was an ethics attorney for 11 years while you've been an ethics attorney for ?
 
christiefan915 said:
What does that have to do with Prager?
Click to expand...

You're the one who brought up Prager, aren't you, illogical one?

I happen to agree with the Pastor in this instance. I don't recall His Shaubness Tweeting about the ethics of Lois Lerner's IRS scandal or Cankles' tarmac meeting with Blowjob Bill. Do you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top