Jerry Mathers
Was it me?
Maybe some people shouldn't be baited into violence so easy. Let's all put on our big boy pants.
Florida Stand Your Ground Law Causing Needless Deaths
- Thread starter PoliTalker
- Start date
Yea...except none of that happened
Life is Golden
The Sage
Sure it did.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Trump Diva,
If your position depends on creating wild exaggerations and outright fabrications of an opposing position then your argument is weak.
The only reason for a law which allows people to kill needlessly is to promote gun profits.
It comes at a tragic cost of lives, parents, racial tensions, and social harmony.
It is a bad law.
If your position depends on creating wild exaggerations and outright fabrications of an opposing position then your argument is weak.
The only reason for a law which allows people to kill needlessly is to promote gun profits.
It comes at a tragic cost of lives, parents, racial tensions, and social harmony.
It is a bad law.
Life is Golden
The Sage
No exaggeration. You'd prefer the victim of a crime be forced to flee their own property to save the life of a criminal. The law allows citizens to defend their lives and property against criminals.
That's messed up.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Trump Diva,
You are guilty of a straw man argument. I never said the things which swirl around in the fantasy in which you are lost.
Here are some facts:
A black guy pushed a white guy because the white guy was harassing his significant other.
The black guy made no more moves or threatening actions.
The black guy was actually moving away from the white guy.
The white guy pulls out a gun (exactly what the NRA wants) and needlessly shot the black guy to death.
There was no need to shoot.
All he did was stop the unarmed black guy from standing there.
You are supporting a law which allows white guys to provoke black guys and then needlessly shoot them dead if they make a move.
You support a law which creates orphans.
This is an anti-family law.
You are guilty of a straw man argument. I never said the things which swirl around in the fantasy in which you are lost.
Here are some facts:
A black guy pushed a white guy because the white guy was harassing his significant other.
The black guy made no more moves or threatening actions.
The black guy was actually moving away from the white guy.
The white guy pulls out a gun (exactly what the NRA wants) and needlessly shot the black guy to death.
There was no need to shoot.
All he did was stop the unarmed black guy from standing there.
You are supporting a law which allows white guys to provoke black guys and then needlessly shoot them dead if they make a move.
You support a law which creates orphans.
This is an anti-family law.
The shooter was to blame.
That's not what happened.. Why did you make that up?
Exactly.. So why is she lying about it..
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello kudzu,
Apparently Trump Diva does not know the difference between Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground. Trump Diva seems to believe the shooter was protecting his home. That is not true.
The needless parking space killing episode began when the shooter approached somebody in the parking area of a convenience store. The shooter was upset because a black person parked in a handicap space without having the credentials to park there. It was pointless because there were actually empty parking spaces closer to the store entrance than the handicap space.
The victim came out of the store and found the shooter standing there harassing his mate, the mother of his child, who was in the driver seat of the car.
The victim pushed the shooter, who fell down, away from the car.
The shooter pulls out a concealed gun and points it at the victim, who took steps backward.
The shooter then fires a shot, killing the victim.
There appeared to be no threat to the shooter.
Under SYG, the shooter was not charged with any crime after killing someone in an altercation which he provoked.
Apparently Trump Diva does not know the difference between Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground. Trump Diva seems to believe the shooter was protecting his home. That is not true.
The needless parking space killing episode began when the shooter approached somebody in the parking area of a convenience store. The shooter was upset because a black person parked in a handicap space without having the credentials to park there. It was pointless because there were actually empty parking spaces closer to the store entrance than the handicap space.
The victim came out of the store and found the shooter standing there harassing his mate, the mother of his child, who was in the driver seat of the car.
The victim pushed the shooter, who fell down, away from the car.
The shooter pulls out a concealed gun and points it at the victim, who took steps backward.
The shooter then fires a shot, killing the victim.
There appeared to be no threat to the shooter.
Under SYG, the shooter was not charged with any crime after killing someone in an altercation which he provoked.
Last edited:
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
There it is, an utterly fucked up law that is in the real world used against black folk so whites can shoot them like police can; for no real reason other than, "black folk scare me".
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Fentoine Lum,
It's too bad people are so afraid of others not like them.
That causes people to act ugly.
It's too bad people are so afraid of others not like them.
That causes people to act ugly.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Lesh,
Agreed.
The reason for the law is clear. GREED.
Greed of the gun profiteers.
Shameless greed that gets people killed needlessly.
Agreed.
The reason for the law is clear. GREED.
Greed of the gun profiteers.
Shameless greed that gets people killed needlessly.
hvilleherb
Verified User
How about having more respect for the law. Don't park in handicapped spots if your not handicapped.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello hvilleherb,
I agree with that.
It was completely greedy/lazy/uncaring of that driver to park in a handicap space. What if somebody with a bona fide need had to use that space and she was taking it up?
And it was also wrong for the victim to push the shooter. All they had to do was get in their car and leave. The shooter was only talking at that point. Not threatening anybody. But not everybody is always in their right mind. People have issues. The victim lost his cool. You don't attack somebody for talking.
The shooter has a right of free speech. He was out of line for taking the law into his own hands. That's not his job. He apparently is a disturbed individual with issues.
We have a method of enforcement for our laws. We should not be taking the law into our own hands. If that shooter wished to see the law upheld in that case he should have called the police. If the police did not respond in time, he could have taken a photo of the woman sitting in the driver seat of the car without handicap credentials parked in the handicap space, contacted police and offered to give testimony under oath to convict the woman of parking illegally. Nobody had to die.
The sentencing for illegal parking does not include the death penalty.
I agree with that.
It was completely greedy/lazy/uncaring of that driver to park in a handicap space. What if somebody with a bona fide need had to use that space and she was taking it up?
And it was also wrong for the victim to push the shooter. All they had to do was get in their car and leave. The shooter was only talking at that point. Not threatening anybody. But not everybody is always in their right mind. People have issues. The victim lost his cool. You don't attack somebody for talking.
The shooter has a right of free speech. He was out of line for taking the law into his own hands. That's not his job. He apparently is a disturbed individual with issues.
We have a method of enforcement for our laws. We should not be taking the law into our own hands. If that shooter wished to see the law upheld in that case he should have called the police. If the police did not respond in time, he could have taken a photo of the woman sitting in the driver seat of the car without handicap credentials parked in the handicap space, contacted police and offered to give testimony under oath to convict the woman of parking illegally. Nobody had to die.
The sentencing for illegal parking does not include the death penalty.