Anatta was right - NYT confirms Deep State White House coup attempt is real

floridafan said:
For a little piece of shit that you are, how can you be defending Bush when you have told us day after day how much you hated him.
Click to expand...

When did I ever say I hated Bush you pathological lying dunce? I don't "defend" Bush anymore than I "defend" Trump. I defend the FACTS and the Truth; something pathological lying leftists dumbfucks like you have zero connection with.
 
Truth Detector said:
That's a fascinating claim; how was it a disaster? We destroyed the largest military force in the region in a matter of weeks. Iraq is currently a democracy and after Obama stumbled, Isis is on the run.

What part was a disaster? You don't like it when nations rid themselves of dictators and vote?





You can only be right if you define success as a disaster snowflake.



Ironic coming from a revisionist history dunce who can't remember what happened yesterday.
Click to expand...

Of course you just happen to neglect that the majority of ISIS came from Saddams Army, and the rest of what they did is history.
 
Truth Detector said:
When did I ever say I hated Bush you pathological lying dunce? I don't "defend" Bush anymore than I "defend" Trump. I defend the FACTS and the Truth; something pathological lying leftists dumbfucks like you have zero connection with.
Click to expand...

As usual you are a fucking cunt liar.
 
floridafan said:
You are more than welcome to question the NY Times article, but it wont change anything. It seems like the "Deep State" that you constantly whine about is made up of Republicans who work in the White House. Who woulda thought!
Click to expand...
are you willfully ignorant or just stupid? This is why I use a "deep statish" term, not the IC based Deep state.
The intent is the same,the means and opportunities are different

I question the timing,and the intent of the Times, and I question the story itself since major players all explicity deny it. It's a political hit piece dressed up as some kina patriotic garbage for you nitwits to chew on.

Remember I told you long ago the NYTime is about "advocacy journalism?" ( NYTimes own words)
well this is what you get when journalists are willing to print anything that justifies their advocacy.
fake, unverified hit pieces dressed up as something more
 
Truth Detector said:
it was an answer you ignorant dumbfuck; you asked what state like a dumbass thinking I made a mistake. I am pretty sure you don't even know what you are trying to argue given the moronic flailing exhibited here.
Click to expand...
What State (country) was Saddam about to invade?

It is a simple question, even for a simpleton.

Please answer or be known as a liar.

Thanks
 
Thing1 said:
That war is a last resort.
Click to expand...

I want to touch for a moment on this asinine claim; we waited ten fucking years for Saddam's compliance. Suggesting that we RUSHED into war with him is not merely a moronic lie, but it is an effort to fabricate an alternate reality and dishonest.
 
anatta said:
are you willfully ignorant or just stupid? This is why I use a "deep statish" term, not the IC based Deep state.
The intent is the same,the means and opportunities are different

I question the timing,and the intent of the Times, and I question the story itself since major players all explicity deny it. It's a political hit piece dressed up as some kina patriotic garbage for you nitwits to chew on.

Remember I told you long ago the NYTime is about "advocacy journalism?" ( NYTimes own words)
well this is what you get when journalists are willing to print anything that justifies their advocacy.
fake, unverified hit pieces dressed up as something more
Click to expand...

Bingo.

It will be forgotten by next week and they’ll just move on to the next thing. And around we go.

I have to think lots and lots of people are jaded by the non-stop hysteria.
 
anatta said:
are you willfully ignorant or just stupid? This is why I use a "deep statish" term, not the IC based Deep state.
The intent is the same,the means and opportunities are different

I question the timing,and the intent of the Times, and I question the story itself since major players all explicity deny it. It's a political hit piece dressed up as some kina patriotic garbage for you nitwits to chew on.

Remember I told you long ago the NYTime is about "advocacy journalism?" ( NYTimes own words)
well this is what you get when journalists are willing to print anything that justifies their advocacy.
fake, unverified hit pieces dressed up as something more
Click to expand...

Who the fuck really cares what you believe or not.
 
Darth Omar said:
If they really thought that they’d come out with it, publicly. Do you mean to imply they are cowards?

If you want to psychoanalyze Trump look at his actions. His economic policies are apparently pretty sound. He’s already appointed one top notch SCOTUS judge and will soon have another. That makes two of them. Does that sound like the product of a debilitated mind?

Ironically, Trump’s Twitter account is exculpatory. If Trump was dangerously unstable he’d be apt to Tweet his plans to bomb NK before noon, and Tweet it before his advisors could stop him from doing it. Trump Tweets crap he shouldn’t but more often than not what he Tweets is cogent and on point. Though Trump is absolutely a loose canon and is prone to say what’s on his mind. Myself and millions of other Trump supporters find his candor refreshing.

But being a loose cannon isn’t a psych diagnosis.
Click to expand...
it's a ridiculous endeavor to psychoanalyze anyone from afar. I don't find his candor "refreshing" i find it needed to hit back on the constant garbage newz cycle of stormy /25th amendment blah blah

It pisses off the press he's called them out for what they are : craven partisans dressed up as journalists
 
Rune said:
What State (country) was Saddam about to invade?

It is a simple question, even for a simpleton.

Please answer or be known as a liar.

Thanks
Click to expand...

You didn't ask that question you brain dead dumbfuck; Saddam had invaded Kuwait. They had also invaded Iraq. They were threatening Saudi Arabia. How fucking dense are you to ask such a stupid question? Moron.
 
floridafan said:
Of course you just happen to neglect that the majority of ISIS came from Saddams Army, and the rest of what they did is history.
Click to expand...

Of course you just happen to be a pathological lying dumbfuck who doesn't admit that Obama was the one who allowed ISIS to come back into the nation because he pulled everyone out. Then Obama the dunce extraordinaire called them JV.
 
Darth Omar said:
Bingo.

It will be forgotten by next week and they’ll just move on to the next thing. And around we go.

I have to think lots and lots of people are jaded by the non-stop hysteria.
Click to expand...
non stop hysteria is exactly what it is.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is another term for it. They can't stop screaming at the sky
 
anatta said:
it's a ridiculous endeavor to psychoanalyze anyone from afar. I don't find his candor "refreshing" i find it needed to hit back on the constant garbage newz cycle of stormy /25th amendment blah blah

It pisses off the press he's called them out for what they are : craven partisans dressed up as journalists
Click to expand...

It’s refreshing in the sense we have someone that will, finally, stand up to the MSM—and even hit back.

Small wonder they want rid of him.

That said, Trump Tweets stuff that he shouldn’t. But you have to take the good with the bad.
 
Truth Detector said:
Of course you just happen to be a pathological lying dumbfuck who doesn't admit that Obama was the one who allowed ISIS to come back into the nation because he pulled everyone out. Then Obama the dunce extraordinaire called them JV.
Click to expand...

It was Mr. Bush himself who set the timetable for American withdrawal. Either way, the majority of todays ISIS came from Saddams Army which Bush disbanded.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top