We already have tons of socialism in the country.
You don't seem to know what you believe in. Because you're just making this shit up as you go.
Federal deficit grows by 32% to $900B
- Thread starter LV426
- Start date
We already have tons of socialism in the country.
You don't seem to know what you believe in. Because you're just making this shit up as you go.
Fucking moron, this whole discussion has been about how you're misrepresenting that figure.
So of course I acknowledged it. We're debating the merits of that very argument right now.
What a fucking fraud.
Sigh...
Now you're trying to jury-rig your argument post-hoc to save face on an anonymous message board.
Fact is benefits have been cut for SNAP recipients. You're trying to pretend they haven't because the volume of SNAP recipients has increased since 2000. So you're only telling half the story. Which is why your argument is bad faith.
Conservatives refused to raise it.
reagansghost
eternal
btw I'm doing much better than you are
I also don't do all-nighters here posting horseshit, get some rest knucklehead
Last raised under Bush when? Oh right, in 2007. And who controlled Congress and the Senate in 2007? Oh right, Democrats.
The Democrats were the ones who raised it in 2007. Then they tried to raise it again in 2011, but Conservatives obstructed.
So you're lying. Why?
You oppose deficits that declined throughout Obama, but don't care about deficits that grow during Trump.
So that's what makes you a hypocrite.
I didn't refuse to acknowledge it. I answered it directly by pointing out that benefits have been cut.
That's what this whole fucking discussion is about; how you acted in bad faith by presenting only half the story in order to push a false narrative.
What a fraud.
Time to delete that account and create a new one.
1. You didn't know those benefits had been cut.
2. It was in response to your bad faith argument about SNAP spending increasing.
So I totally acknowledged that the SNAP budget is higher than before, and my response to that was to point out that while the program is larger, individual benefits are less. You didn't realize that was the case. You dumbly thought that because SNAP grew, that meant that the amount beneficiaries got from SNAP also grew. That was the argument you were starting to make. But then when it was pointed out to you that individual benefits have declined, you started this bizarre defense that I didn't acknowledge the SNAP budget was larger, even though that's what prompted me to link to the proof showing benefits had been cut.
So you fucking lied by telling a half-truth, then you lied again about my response to your half-truth.
Anyone can look at this thread and see for themselves what a fucking fraud you are.
Stop being such a whiner. You obviously created this account in the last couple days because you had squandered all your credibility with whatever account you had before. Eventually, you're going to slip up and reveal who you are pretending not to be, you'll fall back into the same habits, and everyone will have a big laugh about it.
The Russia Tax Cut grew the deficit by 32%.
Cutting taxes creates deficits.
They figured that out in Kansas, so why are you having such a hard time figuring it out?
So more of your bullshit "I hate government, just look at me, I hate them, look! LOOK HOW HARD I'M POSTURING!"
Yeah, we get it...you read Ayn Rand at age 13 and have been in a state of arrested development ever since.
You have a very juvenile understanding of the world. That's likely because you're in a state of arrested development, and have been ever since you read Atlas Shrugged when you were 13.
So when government buys raw materials or supplies, or when it contracts out, they're not buying it from companies that produce it, or contracting work out to private sector companies? So from where are they buying that stuff and to whom are they giving contracts? Narnia and magic elves? All government spending happens in the same economy as consumer spending. It's all part of the same economy. The cashier at Best Buy doesn't give a shit from where your dollar comes. All they care about is that you have a dollar.
Most of that stuff was developed by the US government and then was commercialized later on.
You didn't list a single one. You just spoke very vaguely and ambiguously.
LOL!
The point of America is TAXATION WITH REPRESENTATION.
That's why they dumped tea in Boston Harbor. They literally said "No taxation without representation".
I don't think you're an American. I think you just created this profile because someone has sussed your previous profile out. So you had to do a new profile because you had squandered all your credibility. This is you trying to hit the "reset" button, isn't it?
Yes it does you fucking moron.
Global demand is the entire reason they wanted to build the KXL pipeline. Even TransCanada said in their permit application that they want it so they can sell the oil for a higher price on the global markets than to the US PADD II region, which is where it currently goes and is oversupplied, leading to price discounting.
Why do you think you can fake your way through this discussion?
No they're not. You're making this shit up.
Oil: A big investment with big tax breaks
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/oil-tax-break.asp
Wrong and lies, of course.
When it comes to tax-advantaged investments for wealthy or sophisticated investors, one commodity continues to stand alone above all others: oil. With the U.S. government's backing, domestic energy production has created a litany of tax incentives for both investors and small producers, and oil is no exception
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/07/oil-tax-break.asp#ixzz5Qzek9jrL
So you have a habit of coming on the boards and running your fat mouth. You lie, make shit up, don't support your argument with links or cited sources, and you create new profiles because you squandered all your credibility on the last profile by doing exactly what you're doing here; lying and making shit up.