ALL NYC Public Schools go to "meatless mondays". Forced vegetarianism

We know what's best for you and your children. Now shut the fuck up and get on board or there will be fines, penalties and/or increased taxes.

-- The Left
 
To an extent, yes. And that's a very good thing, since it would be immoral to have kids suffer even more than necessary from the bad luck of un-engaged parents. But, it's not just the parents who don't care. It's those who aren't in a position to help much, given their own lack of academic background and lack of resources. It helps to level the playing field for kids.

It's immoral to expect those that already do for their kids to do because a kid's own parents won't do.

Let a kid's own parents level their kid's playing field.

Why do you support enabling freeloaders?
 
We know what's best for you and your children. Now shut the fuck up and get on board or there will be fines, penalties and/or increased taxes.

-- The Left

And

We know you did for your kids like you were supposed to so we'll demand more from you and ignore that the unwilling parents refuse to do their job

--The Left.
 
It's immoral to expect those that already do for their kids to do because a kid's own parents won't do.

What would make the immoral?

Let a kid's own parents level their kid's playing field.

I'm happy to let them do so. However, when they don't do so, I'm not enough of a monster to just leave the innocent child to suffer.

Why do you support enabling freeloaders?

I'm not. I just don't support using children as hostages to force behaviors on their parents. Why do you?
 
There's an easy remedy. If you want someone else's kid to have a hot meal, reach into YOUR pocket and buy it for them. See how easy that is?

What's even easier, and vastly more efficient, is for us to pool our efforts by way of a government program. That's the benefit of living in a civilization: we can be greater than the sum of our parts.
 
What would make the immoral?



I'm happy to let them do so. However, when they don't do so, I'm not enough of a monster to just leave the innocent child to suffer.



I'm not. I just don't support using children as hostages to force behaviors on their parents. Why do you?

Demanding those that aren't the parents do what have no problem with those that are the parents refusing to do.

I'm not a monster. I provided for the kids to which I had a responsibility. Someone else's kids aren't on that list.

No, you use those children to force others that aren't their parents to do what you're willing to let the kid's own parents not do. Why is that?
 
Demanding those that aren't the parents do what have no problem with those that are the parents refusing to do.

I couldn't figure out what you were trying to say.

I'm not a monster.

If you're willing to let innocent children suffer, when there are such simple and cost-effective alternatives, I'd say you are.

I provided for the kids to which I had a responsibility.

Humankind is your responsibility.

No, you use those children to force others that aren't their parents to do what you're willing to let the kid's own parents not do. Why is that?

I'm not sure what you were trying to say.
 
What's even easier, and vastly more efficient, is for us to pool our efforts by way of a government program. That's the benefit of living in a civilization: we can be greater than the sum of our parts.

There's also a cost to living in a civilization. It's called supporting your own kids. Why do you oppose parents paying the costs for their own kids?
 
I couldn't figure out what you were trying to say.



If you're willing to let innocent children suffer, when there are such simple and cost-effective alternatives, I'd say you are.



Humankind is your responsibility.



I'm not sure what you were trying to say.

That's because you're a goddamn idiot troll that should have been allowed to starve when you were a kid.

The monsters are the parents that refuse to do for their own kids and those that claim people should yet refuse to do it personally themselves. I have no responsibility to any kids except mine. Therefore, there is no accountability on me.

See the first statement above.
 
Oh fuck off. I had school lunches most of Jr high and high school.

no....he's right......"used to be" parents packed their kids a lunch that they carried in an old Karo Syrup pail and they ate it in their one room school house next to a wood burning pot belly stove.........then they went to the stable, saddled their horses and rode home.......
 
Yep. We had actual cooks in the kitchen back then. We loved the "lunch ladies". Meat, fish, poultry, greens, rice, potatoes, desserts...all cooked THERE. Now it's all the frozen junk food I guess. They'd be better off bringing lunch from home. A simple sandwich, a fruit and drink.

I remember the days that lunch was a bowl of chili and a cinnamon roll.......still one of my favorite comfort food meals.......
 
I don't. But I'm not so much of a monster that if the parents don't pay those costs, I'm willing to let the kids suffer for it.

You are willing to let those kids suffer. You're the one that says things should be provided yet personally refuse to provide it.

You do oppose a kid's parents paying the costs.
 
IDIOT! So what! We had meatless FRIDAYS for all of my12 years in the 7 schools I went to, all but one was PUBLIC, and only a small segment of the students were CATHOLICS. I guess that was some sort of RELIGIOUS tyranny too? The Papist kind! OHHHH NO!

There are some really dumbass people on this board. Hell, the best complete protein there is is to serve the kids up a combination of rice and legumes (beans)! And it's cheap, low fat but you just gotta spice it well.


lib'ruls demanded that cease because it was support of religion........guess that doesn't apply to Vegens........
 
You do. You're a human and so are they. If you reject the responsibilities of being a human, that's what makes you a monster.

No I don't. Their parents do. If their own parents don't give a shit enough about them to do for them, their parents are saying they aren't worth the price.

Their parents are human and a parent refusing to do for their own is a monster.
 
Hell, the best complete protein there is is to serve the kids up a combination of rice and legumes (beans)!


sorry, but rice and beans will give you 21g of protein but at a cost of 112 carbs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_federal_political_scandals_in_the_United_States#Executive_Branch_2

better and cheaper would be a cheese omelette 21g protein with only 1g of carbs......https://www.myfitnesspal.com/food/calories/2-egg-cheese-omelette-20g-cheddar-239377121

low income kids get obese on rice and beans......
 
Back
Top