Please list those actions that obstructed justice

Jack said:
Most people want to see the full Report before coming to any conclusion.
Click to expand...

Not according to the majority of the comments, here on JPP; because it does appear that they've already come to a conclusion and they're going to stick with it.

:truestory:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Not according to the majority of the comments, here on JPP; because it does appear that they've already come to a conclusion and they're going to stick with it.

:truestory:
Click to expand...

Most of the people I've seen post want to know what the Report has to say. The only person that has made up his mind ... is AG Barr.
 
Jack said:
Most of the people I've seen post want to know what the Report has to say. The only person that has made up his mind ... is AG Barr.
Click to expand...

So you're just ignoring the DISCLAIMER, where they've already said what their conclusion is. :good4u:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you're just ignoring the FACT that they've already said what their conclusion is. :good4u:
Click to expand...

Who's 'they'? The imaginary group you've made up in your head?
(I've made myself a Tamale that I bought from this Honduran store, going to watch SNL. Have to talk at you later)
 
QUOTE=Jack;2974470]Most people want to see the full Report before coming to any conclusion.[/QUOTE]
USFREEDOM911 said:
Not according to the majority of the comments, here on JPP; because it does appear that they've already come to a conclusion and they're going to stick with it.

:truestory:
Click to expand...
Jack said:
Most of the people I've seen post want to know what the Report has to say. The only person that has made up his mind ... is AG Barr.
Click to expand...
USFREEDOM911 said:
So you're just ignoring the DISCLAIMER, where they've already said what their conclusion is. :good4u:
Click to expand...
Jack said:
Who's 'they'? The imaginary group you've made up in your head?
(I've made myself a Tamale that I bought from this Honduran store, going to watch SNL. Have to talk at you later)
Click to expand...

If you haven't been paying attention, it's not my fault or responsibility. :D
 
Jack said:
"Trump telling the news anchor in May 2017 that he fired the FBI chief at least partly because of the Russia investigation"
Trump is admitting he fired Comey because of the Russia Investigation.
You know, like, 'The FBI is investigating me, so I fired the guy to stop the Investigation'.
Click to expand...

Did the investigation stop?

Even if a Special Counsel wasn't appointed, would the investigation have stopped?

Did it obstruct the investigation?
 
Jack said:
Most people want to see the full Report before coming to any conclusion.
Click to expand...

but you aren't going to see the FULL report. You knew going in that it would be redacted for national security and grand jury testimony reasons.

Of course it isn't that you really want to see it. This is nothing more than a left wing ruse to say "they are hiding something"

It would be great if you douchebags weren't so transparent
 
Jack said:
"Former FBI Director James Comey told NBC News on Wednesday that his 2017 firing by President Donald Trump was “potentially obstruction of justice.”
In an exclusive interview on “Nightly News,” Lester Holt asked Comey about his reaction to Trump telling the news anchor in May 2017 that he fired the FBI chief at least partly because of the Russia investigation."
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/27/jam...ng-as-potentially-obstruction-of-justice.html
Click to expand...

If they wanted to investigate Trump for obstruction at that point, fine. They should have forced Rosenstein to recuse and got on with it. Oh, and limited the investigation just to obstruction of justice.

But there is good evidence [hint: better evidence than they had on Trump for obstruction] that it was *known at the time* that there was scant evidence for collusion. But the investigation proceeded for a full two years without Mullet so much as giving a preliminary report of ‘no collusion has so far been found’.

It’s easy, very easy, to get the idea the whole point was damage Trump if not take him out completely.

So, let’s not stop investigating now. There are a whole host of questions surrounding the origin of the Russian investigation, itself.

It’s so patently obvious I have no idea what they are waiting on.
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
If they wanted to investigate Trump for obstruction at that point, fine. They should have forced Rosenstein to recuse and got on with it. Oh, and limited the investigation just to obstruction of justice.

But there is good evidence [hint: better evidence than they had on Trump for obstruction] that it was *known at the time* that there was scant evidence for collusion. But the investigation proceeded for a full two years without Mullet so much as giving a preliminary report of ‘no collusion has so far been found’.

It’s easy, very easy, to get the idea the whole point was damage Trump if not take him out completely.

So, let’s not stop investigating now. There are a whole host of questions surrounding the origin of the Russian investigation, itself.

It’s so patently obvious I have no idea what they are waiting on.
Click to expand...
Spot on, as usual, DBO.

Pristine conclusion.


Time to roll on the investigation of the corrupt investigators.
 
Jack said:
USF: "Well, opinions are like assholes and apparently you've stretched both of yours."
Jack: This is a 'lame reply'.
Click to expand...

Jack, you have two parts to your brain, 'left' and 'right'. In the left side, there's nothing right. In the right side, there's nothing left.
 
iolo said:
I trust that all the right-wing weirdoes will now put pressure on Trumpf to publish the Report!
Click to expand...

A PhD should know how to properly spell the president of the US, "Trump" and "weirdos."

The report, minus redactions for classified material and grand jury information (per the law) will be released.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top