What a great question

You didn’t like the last question, did you lol.

So, what would exculpatory evidence look like—in your ‘scholarly’ opinion?

Irrelevant to the fact that you claimed there was such evidence, and then proceeded to offer things that are not exculpatory evidence. You have no idea what the term means and aske question to try and distract from that means.

Idiot.
 
Irrelevant to the fact that you claimed there was such evidence, and then proceeded to offer things that are not exculpatory evidence. You have no idea what the term means and aske question to try and distract from that means.

Idiot.

You’re picky about what questions you’ll answer, aren’t you lol.
 
Irrelevant to the fact that you claimed there was such evidence, and then proceeded to offer things that are not exculpatory evidence. You have no idea what the term means and aske question to try and distract from that means.

Idiot.

Here’s what you and democrats are up to—you think you’re sneaky but you’re not. Your illicit motives are plain to anyone paying attention.

All you need is the word ‘indictment’ to come out of Barr’s mouth since Mullet punted on it. The indictment could be worthless in a courtroom but it would be invaluable to democrats in terms of their unholy crusade to impeach Trump for something/anything.

I nailed it, didn’t I.
 
I expected him to be honest.

I expect Barr to be an AG.

We finally have one that follows the rule of law, isn’t limp wristed and won’t be browbeat into submission by partisan Congress critters.

Barr is at least that much. Whether he follows through with Swamp draining remains to be seen. Though democrats are certainly acting as if he should be taken seriously lol.
 
I expect Barr to be an AG.

We finally have one that follows the rule of law, isn’t limp wristed and won’t be browbeat into submission by partisan Congress critters.

Barr is at least that much. Whether he follows through with Swamp draining remains to be seen. Though democrats are certainly acting as if he should be taken seriously lol.

How is he not limp wristed if he just did what Trump wanted instead of giving an honest summary?
 
How is he not limp wristed if he just did what Trump wanted instead of giving an honest summary?

The summary, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder lol?

I know I keep repeating myself, but Barr’s job doesn’t entail saying Trump is a great guy or an evil one. Did you agree with the way Comey smeared Hillary—but didn’t indict her? If you or anyone else had a problem with that you shouldn’t be critical of Barr for NOT doing the identical thing to Trump.
 
I know I keep repeating myself, but Barr’s job doesn’t entail saying Trump is a great guy or an evil one.

Yes, I agree that Barr shouldn't have summarized the report in a way that made Trump look either good or bad. He should have summarized it in a way that was most accurate.
However, he did not do that. Instead, he purposely left out all of the corrupt things Trump did.

If you don't care that Trump is extremely corrupt because he has the Magic R, I can understand liking what Barr did. But keep in mind that he's setting a very dangerous lowering of standards. What if the next president is as corrupt as Trump but doesn't have the Magic R?
 
Yes, I agree that Barr shouldn't have summarized the report in a way that made Trump look either good or bad. He should have summarized it in a way that was most accurate.
However, he did not do that. Instead, he purposely left out all of the corrupt things Trump did.

If you don't care that Trump is extremely corrupt because he has the Magic R, I can understand liking what Barr did. But keep in mind that he's setting a very dangerous lowering of standards. What if the next president is as corrupt as Trump but doesn't have the Magic R?

What’s ‘dangerous’ is for two years people were assuring the whole country that a sitting, duly elected president—was a Russian agent. And they turned out to be dead wrong. Instead of trying to wring something criminal [because he has the Magic R or simply because he’s Trump] Trump *might* have done during the course of the investigation, the investigation itself—needs investigated to ensure it never happens again.
 
Last edited:
What’s ‘dangerous’ is for two years people were assuring the whole country that a sitting, duly elected president—was a Russian agent. And they turned out to be dead wrong. Instead of trying to wring something criminal [because he has the Magic R or simply because he’s Trump] Trump *might* have done during the course of the investigation the investigation itself—needs investigated to ensure it never happens again.

An apology is due to our president and his family. He was called a traitor, a Putin puppet and worse. He and his family have been persecuted by a lie from the entire Democrat party that has been proven to be a lie.

Americans are a fair minded people, at least most of them are and they will remember this political persecution that continues to this day, on election day.
 
What’s ‘dangerous’ is for two years people were assuring the whole country that a sitting, duly elected president—was a Russian agent. And they turned out to be dead wrong. Instead of trying to wring something criminal [because he has the Magic R or simply because he’s Trump] Trump *might* have done during the course of the investigation, the investigation itself—needs investigated to ensure it never happens again.
Applause.
 
What’s ‘dangerous’ is for two years people were assuring the whole country that a sitting, duly elected president—was a Russian agent. And they turned out to be dead wrong. Instead of trying to wring something criminal [because he has the Magic R or simply because he’s Trump] Trump *might* have done during the course of the investigation, the investigation itself—needs investigated to ensure it never happens again.

Trump may not have been a Russian agent (duh) but the report did find that he tried to collude with the Russian government. He failed, because he's a retard, but he tried, which is what matters.
 
the report is out.....everyone knows it was an honest summary......time to stop being a dickhead.....

Barr was admonished by Mueller for giving an inaccurate summary of the report. Barr left out things like the secret meeting, the attempt at obstructing justice, and the attempt at e-mailing Russian agents.
 
Trump may not have been a Russian agent (duh) but the report did find that he tried to collude with the Russian government. He failed, because he's a retard, but he tried, which is what matters.

Duh lol?

Where have you been hiding the past two years? It’s not hyperbole to say Trump was being accused of being a Russian agent or being accused of treason or etc. Google Putin’s Puppet and see how many hits come from media sources. Never, in the history of this country, has a president had to put up with such a degree of malicious lies and misinformation coming from a media fed by anonymous sources within the government.

And it’s past time to get to the bottle of it.
 
Back
Top