Nancy has been waiting because she wants more than just impeachment-JAIL!!

Pelosi is not for impeachment because she is a political wonk. She is counting votes and asking questions. When she impeaches the thief in chief, she cannot risk losing. With a dead end chicken shit Senate, she cannot win unless Trump crooked activities turn off enough Repub voters.
On the other hand, the impeachment of a dishonest president is seen as some as a sacred duty. That is where Warren is.
Pelosi is in a tough spot.

I am running out of bread with all this baloney snowflake! :laugh:
 
She will drag this out right up to the next election. It truly is the only thing Democrats have to offer. No legislation, no platform, no plans for the future. Just get Trump.

Of course, how long was BenghaziGate "dragged," let alone the endless redundant GOP investigations into anything and everything before and after BenghaziGate

And once again, fourth time actually, proof that the Democrats have been the only body in Congress working

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/subjects/house_of_representatives/5947
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la...e-senate-passing-few-laws-20190415-story.html
 
Why is the conventional wisdom that Conservatives and Trump will act totally chill and calm during impeachment, and not like a bunch of hysterical, rabid goonbats who can't help from tripping over their own limp, mushroom-looking dicks?

giphy.gif
 
Yet he did not conclude there was enough evidence to indict for obstruction.

Again, the only reason he didn't was because of OLC guidelines that he explains himself.

Also, there are 13 or 14 other investigations currently happening that were spun off of Mueller's.
 
Of course, how long was BenghaziGate "dragged," let alone the endless redundant GOP investigations into anything and everything before and after BenghaziGate

Comparing the deaths of Benghazi to the massive Russia Hoax is moronic and the effort of a whiny low IQ tard lacking any sense of reality and proportion.

Cry harder asshat.
 
Did she say she was not going to impeach him?? Seems to me she is biding her time, waiting to see what comes up...:corn:

Bill, she’s a politician lol.

You almost always have to read between the lines with them. This isn’t debate board stuff for Pelosi. If she moves to impeach Trump while the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed—is itself, under investigation—she’s gambling with the future of her party. If House Democrats are in the midst of impeachment and it comes out that the Russian investigation was corrupt, 2020 will be a veritable Democrat blood bath.

She can’t afford to assume there’s nothing to it. Ignore what she says to the contrary.
 
Of course, how long was BenghaziGate "dragged," let alone the endless redundant GOP investigations into anything and everything before and after BenghaziGate

And once again, fourth time actually, proof that the Democrats have been the only body in Congress working

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/subjects/house_of_representatives/5947
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la...e-senate-passing-few-laws-20190415-story.html

Obviously you did not read my other post or just went blind over it. Your link shows clearly Democrat Congress is not doing shit for being the majority.
 
Bill, she’s a politician lol.

You almost always have to read between the lines with them. This isn’t debate board stuff for Pelosi. If she moves to impeach Trump while the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed—is itself, under investigation—she’s gambling with the future of her party. If House Democrats are in the midst of impeachment and it comes out that the Russian investigation was corrupt, 2020 will be a veritable Democrat blood bath.

She can’t afford to assume there’s nothing to it. Ignore what she says to the contrary.

You assume that Conservatives will calmly and cooly withstand impeachment, and not act like the barnyard animals they are.
 
Again, the only reason he didn't was because of OLC guidelines that he explains himself.

WRONG; he didn't because there was insufficient evidence to support such an idiotic claim.

NO ONE got fired. NO ONE destroyed evidence. NO ONE refused to cooperate. NO ONE shut down the investigation NO ONE chose not to release the entire report. NO ONE exercised executive privilege.

Page 173 V I: Ultimately, the investigation did not establish that the Campaign coordinated or conspired with the Russian government in its election-interference activities.

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.



Also, there are 13 or 14 other investigations currently happening that were spun off of Mueller's.

LIE and LAME; they are fishing expeditions having nothing to do with the Mueller report. They are the result of angry, childish Democrats who refuse to accept the FACT that they have a massive NOTHING burger and want to insist there is something there. Dunce.
 
If she moves to impeach Trump while the investigation Trump allegedly obstructed—is itself, under investigation—she’s gambling with the future of her party.

This post reeks of desperation; like you know your goose is cooked, you're just trying to create a fog of controversy around the Mueller Report because you recognize just how bad it is for you, your judgment, your instincts, and Trump.
 
What part of DIVIDED Congress are you struggling with. The House Democrats will get NOTHING done trying to ram their agenda down the Senate or the White House's throats.

It's not about THEM. It's not about YOU. It's about US. And WE don't like it when ONE side thinks it can dictate the agenda without the majority to do it.

Elections do have consequences. Meanwhile, I believe Nancy will go down as the most unproductive Speaker in the history of the House.

THREE pieces of legislation have reached the Presidents desk. It's June. That has to be a record.[/QUOTE

The House is doing its job, legislating, what Mitch does isn't on them. The Senate's role is to take up the House's proposals, discuss them, amend them, pass or reject them, or send them back to the House. Mitch hasn't let them travel beyond his desk

Amazing how much some Trumpkins don't know or just can't accept yet it doesn't stop them from offering opinions
 
If House Democrats are in the midst of impeachment and it comes out that the Russian investigation was corrupt, 2020 will be a veritable Democrat blood bath..

The Mueller Investigation was not corrupt at all.

Pretending it is just shows how fucking desperate you are.

This is when you start floating lifeboats for yourself, and this is where I set fire to each of them.
 
You assume that Conservatives will calmly and cooly withstand impeachment, and not act like the barnyard animals they are.

We assume you are an idiot prone to making moronic claims and idiotic predictions which never prove out. You never seem to tire of looking like an idiot. Further evidence of your lack of intelligence and complete lack of self awareness.

;)
 
Obviously you did not read my other post or just went blind over it. Your link shows clearly Democrat Congress is not doing shit for being the majority.

So the hundred plus proposals in five months sent to the Senate "is doing shit?" It is legislating, which is their function
 
Back
Top