California becomes first state to ban hairstyle discrimination

coming from a racist bigoted cockroach who doesn't know anything about me.

I've been trying to get him to show proof of his claimed service. You'd thing someone as proud of he is, provided he actually did serve, would have provided it by now.
 
I've been trying to get him to show proof of his claimed service. You'd thing someone as proud of he is, provided he actually did serve, would have provided it by now.

Someone with his racist and bigoted attitude would have received a blanket party on a daily basis.
 
I didn't in the least. You made two points by the way.

You kind of did by using all of the racial buzzwords and trying to make it about prejudice.


1. Is a battle between conflicting positive and negative liberties, and I professed my belief your positive liberty argument is a figleaf over ugly prejudice

See this is what I mean. But ok, let's just say it's "ugly prejudice." Should the government force us to associate with people that we're prejudice against?

2. I agreed, and that your win is short termed and helped by hyperbolic bullshit and fear not reality.

You think this is a win for me? I don't want the country to reelect Trump and further head towards Fascism either. And it's hardly going to be short term. Look at what's happening in Europe.
And no, it's not hyperbolic to say that the Democrats are taking away more of our freedoms.


individual liberty dudes care to acknowledge these businesses are open to that nasty concept called "the public."

Sure, but we're talking about private companies, not public companies.

Apparently owning a business includes an absolute right to trammel everyone with whom
ones does business. Razor blade burgers on sale now! The second you concede one cannot do whatever the fuck one wants just because they own something,
that is the second that argument loses, because then we are not debating the fact that you are a prostitute, we are negotiating the price. I say not discriminating
against hair you hate that happens to be worn 99.999999 percent by black people is not too high a price.

Complete hyperbole. This is like saying we shouldn't even have freedom of speech, because we can agree that it should be illegal to threaten someone or yell BOMB at an airport.

Sure, private companies shouldn't be able to do ANYTHING they want. A restaurant shouldn't be able to poison their customers without them knowing. But comparing that to having a dress code is just extreme.
 
You kind of did by using all of the racial buzzwords and trying to make it about prejudice.




See this is what I mean. But ok, let's just say it's "ugly prejudice." Should the government force us to associate with people that we're prejudice against?



You think this is a win for me? I don't want the country to reelect Trump and further head towards Fascism either. And it's hardly going to be short term. Look at what's happening in Europe.
And no, it's not hyperbolic to say that the Democrats are taking away more of our freedoms.




Sure, but we're talking about private companies, not public companies.



Complete hyperbole. This is like saying we shouldn't even have freedom of speech, because we can agree that it should be illegal to threaten someone or yell BOMB at an airport.

Sure, private companies shouldn't be able to do ANYTHING they want. A restaurant shouldn't be able to poison their customers without them knowing. But comparing that to having a dress code is just extreme.

Of course it was extreme. That was solely to get us to the correct frame of reference. Now we can dicker over the details of our example. I eliminated the "my business I can do whatever the fuck I want" crowd.
The statute as amended by the law says


https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB188

you will see an existing body of law exists and this is a small addition. Note that Afros were already protected by fed law.

I say it's good. You think an employer can require a black men to straighten hair, force him to die it blonde, part it on the left
and wear khakis and a blue button down if not hold a lantern to be "professional" if he feels like it.

Not a big deal, don't disciminate in ed or housing because of hair style. Let Kawhi be Kawhi. He doesn't need to look like Leave it to Beaver dude.
 
What if I want this refusal to do business? If it's a private company, why shouldn't I have that right?

Here's the deal you racist fuck.

You can discriminate against anyone you wish, for what ever reason you want...…..but don't expect to receive any tax breaks or special privileges.

You can't discriminate on the tax payers dime.

Racism needs to pay a price and you will pay that price in CA.
 
Here's the deal you racist fuck.

You can discriminate against anyone you wish, for what ever reason you want...…..but don't expect to receive any tax breaks or special privileges.

You can't discriminate on the tax payers dime.

Racism needs to pay a price and you will pay that price in CA.

Sure, that's fair. We should have freedom of association and the government shouldn't be funding private companies.
 
Of course it was extreme. That was solely to get us to the correct frame of reference. Now we can dicker over the details of our example. I eliminated the "my business I can do whatever the fuck I want" crowd.

But you do realize that it's a bad argument if you're going to use hyperbole, right? Like I said, you could also argue against freedom of speech this way.


I say it's good. You think an employer can require a black men to straighten hair, force him to die it blonde, part it on the left
and wear khakis and a blue button down if not hold a lantern to be "professional" if he feels like it.

Then you don't believe in freedom of association.

By the way, may I ask your ethnicity?
 
I have several NA friends in both real life and in the cyber world. The thing about their children -- especially boys -- wearing braids and having issues with school personnel is a problem in a lot of areas, including Canadian schools.

NA are casualties of the racism aimed towards Blacks.

Braids have always been considered ghetto, unkept hair by "professional" white America.

I have never seen hair discrimination towards any other race when it comes to braids.
 
So now a restaurant HAS to hire a dude with a crazy afro, or smelly dreadlocks down to his ass. That will hurt business.

Wow. Another fail by Commifornia.
 
NA are casualties of the racism aimed towards Blacks.

Braids have always been considered ghetto, unkept hair by "professional" white America.

I have never seen hair discrimination towards any other race when it comes to braids.

So 100% of problems in the black community is because of racism? No one one should ever take personal responsibility?
 
So 100% of problems in the black community is because of racism? No one one should ever take personal responsibility?

100% correct.

You racist fucks don't take responsibility...…..if you did our communities would be better.
 
So 100% of problems in the black community is because of racism? No one one should ever take personal responsibility?

Perhaps TT thinks blacks producing bastard babies at a 75% rate and committing crimes at a rate far higher than their lot in society has nothing to do with choice.
 
100% correct.

You racist fucks don't take responsibility...…..if you did our communities would be better.

If you self proclaimed victims would quit having bastard children at a 75% rate and stop committing crimes on such a highly disproportionate level, imagine how much better things would be for you.
 
Back
Top