Heads up Teabillies - the gubmint's a comin for your small dick compensators

I'm quite sympathetic towards arguments relating to it being an exception, given the horrible nature of rape, but my view is that rape ultimately shouldn't be an exception since I think that every child (barring the aforementioned exception, as that exception preserves viable life) should have the same opportunity at life that you and I have been granted.

Exactly what I said before; the only reason you oppose abortion is because no woman would ever agree to proliferate your genes, so the only way you can do that is to rape her and then force her to carry your deficient offspring to term.
 
Well, I'm doing it right here on this board, and there's not a fucking thing you can do about it.

I'm defining you as a domestic terrorist, zealot, and someone who rejects the democratic process when things don't go your way.

and you can do it online all day long because that will have no effect on me..............just don't try it in the really real world
 
Their inherent position is to deny freedoms to people and commit genocide.

That's not protected speech.

Wrong again. It is protected speech. You can advocate anything you choose. If they deny anyone freedom or commit genocide they can be prosecuted but that is for their actions. Actions and speech are two different things.

Their speech is completely protected (although I guess I have to add I do not sympathize with their beliefs or you will claim I do).

My inherent position is to defend the constitutional rights for everyone.
 
Our limited perspectives do not allow us to see how bad things at the present moment could result in very good things later on during our lifetimes, or even after our lifetimes (we can't see how every action ties together in the grand scheme of things).

Speak for yourself!

My perspective isn't limited because I actually listen to women instead of thinking that they should listen to me.

What a fucking load of horseshit.

What if the kid ends up being a serial killer? What about then? What if the kid ends up being Hitler? What about then? Your bad for not letting the woman get the abortion? Of course, you would then blame the mother if the kid ended up being a psychopath like you.

"Aw shucks, looks like we rolled the dice on this fetus and it came up genocide...oh well..::shrugs::"
 
the people have a right to keep and bear arms, not a right to a well regulated militia. where did you learn english?

He no longer speaks English, nor understands it. He speaks Liberal. This language is often confused with English, but many words in it carry different meanings or even no meaning at all.
 
That's why I feel uncomfortable with rape being an exception, even though I am quite sympathetic towards arguments for it being one.

OK, so what if the fetus grows up to be the next Ted Bundy?

Will you just throw up your hands and say "my bad"?

You talk about how every fetus is going to be some wonderful great person...what if they're not? What if they grow up to be a loser and psychopath like you?

Thing is, I don't buy this bullshit you're saying. I maintain the reason you oppose abortion is because no woman would ever conceive a child with you, and raping her and forcing her to carry the fetus to term is the only way your shit genes can proliferate.

Prove me wrong.


You can't provide my reasoning for me. See above for my reasoning.

I just did. What are you gonna do about it? Cry? Fuck off, crybaby.
 
You tell me, you're the absolutist who said abortion was murder...
It IS murder (in the vast majority of cases). Terminating a baby is not ALWAYS murder, however... I provided a couple of often argued exceptions to the general position.

only to then walk that back within the same statement.
I didn't walk back anything. I simply noted a couple of exceptions to the general position. One which I believe to be an exception, and another which can be argued to be one.

You seem confused of your own position.
I understand my position quite well.
 
This has gotta be a joke, right?

You regulate yourself according to what standards? Ones you defined for yourself? Wow..."hey look! I passed my own inspection of myself!"

A perfectly sensible statement by him. I regulate myself the same way as SmarterthanYou does. Yes. He inspects himself. Why not? He is probably the harshest judge of his own shooting skill of anyone.
 
Regulated by no one, just yourself.
Yup. That's possible!
So that's not regulation, that's just you setting your own personal standards in a vacuum.
Not in a vacuum. By his own judgement and his placement on a target.
And aren't you the one who didn't even have combat experience? Aren't you the one who worked as a glorified air traffic controller? Can't remember if that was you or another terrorist. You all do look alike...
Air traffic controllers are not terrorists, dope.
 
I brought up abortion?

Honestly, I don't remember doing that.

Yes, in post# 99 you reply quoted me from post# 13.

Ralph Northam? You mean the guy who thinks it's ok to kill a baby after it's been born? That guy??? Does he realize how much harder it is to kill an armed adult than a helpless newborn?

Only the biggest fucking idiots in the world think abortion means killing a baby after it is born.

Maybe your intent was to say that Ralph Northam ranks among "the biggest fucking idiots in the world"?

"Infanticide"...but...you don't really know the circumstances surrounding this. It's probably much more complex than you're giving it credit. That's typical of your kind; you barely scratch the surface and then get all hysterical about it.

No one's getting hysterical about anything. I simply pointed out the irony of Ralph blackface fucking Northam trying to act like some kind of moral leader.
 
yes, they opposed a standing army because they KNEW it to be the bane of freedom.................but what do state controlled militias represent??????? a standing army?????

No, they literally don't. That is literally not what a state militia is. It has to be called upon by the State...therefore it isn't "standing".

Wow.
 
Second Amendment For Dummies

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


~ the State shall not infringe upon the right of the people to keep and bear arms in a well regulated militia


and yo rambo jr's, the new republic was wary of foreign invasions like that of King George, made sure there were local militias around to thwart such an attack. the goal wasn't to keep everyone armed with military grade weapons so they can enjoy the right to shoot up society
 
your educational institution failed you in a monstrous way. that is NOT how government works. READ THE CONSTITUTION!!!!!!!!!!!!! then come back

If you're retreating to the "read the Constitution" tactic, then it's obvious you're in over your head in this debate.

Where does "well regulated" mean "regulated to your personal standards, which are extremely fucking low"?
 
and you can do it online all day long because that will have no effect on me..............just don't try it in the really real world

Clearly it does have an effect on you...it's prompted you to make hollow, empty threats.

Threats you lack the fucking balls to even act on.

You'd fold like a cheap suit the moment someone confronted you.

You avoided confrontation in the Marines by hiding behind a desk and monitor.

You don't scare me.
 
Back
Top