Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5

floridafan said:
Gangsters, political criminals, corrupt individuals would never cooperate with any investigation. A innocent person would.
Click to expand...

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Guilt by assumption fallacy.

An innocent person does NOT have to provide any evidence against himself. He does not have to cooperate with any investigation.
 
Jarod said:
Sure they do, this is the indictment process... only the prosecutor has a roll in an indictment.
Click to expand...

The House is not a prosecutor. No prosecutor can indict without specifying a specific crime, including the time and place of the crime and the specific law violated. The House does not have authority to conduct a trial.
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
I never said Nancy was the one doing the investigations-
Click to expand...
Yes you did, liar.
Adolf_Twitler said:
If that is what you think I meant, you are too stupid for me to deal with.
Click to expand...
No, you are just trying to lie your way out.
Adolf_Twitler said:
Get real dude!
Click to expand...
Define 'real'. Bet you can't!
Adolf_Twitler said:
Show us the law in the Constitution, that says the House has to take a vote on impeachment before they do an investigation!
To save you the effort- You won't find one!
Click to expand...
Contextomy fallacy. He never said any such thing. Pay attention, moron.
Adolf_Twitler said:
ANd why does this personally matter to you that has your panties all up in your ass? Huh?
Click to expand...
RQAA.
Adolf_Twitler said:
WTF DOES IT MATTER TO YOU! WHAT DOES IT BUY YOU?
Click to expand...
RQAA.
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
They are running out of ideas on how to be assholes and shit-asses!

Teflon Don has been calling for civil war, and threatening liberals with his guns, because his president has got himself impeached!
Click to expand...

He has not called for civil war.
He is not threatening anyone in the United States with guns.
He has not been impeached.
 
PoliTalker said:
Hello rg,



Must know he's going down. Has probably known his entire life, all leading up to near future events, the course of which cannot be altered as his ascent nears it's final peak.

Has probably been wondering what took so long, seeing how much he could get away with while he still has the chance.

Honestly, the rallies should begin to be called 'Final Desperation Rallies.' We are witness to history in the making.
Click to expand...

That already took place in 2016. What rock were you hiding under?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I have that turd on ignore so haven't seen it, but I have seen plenty of other wannabe-Rambos here threatening the same nonsense. Imagine their surprise when even the most powerful of civilian weapons are stone-tipped spears against the might of the U.S. armed services.
Click to expand...

Thank you for removing yourself from the forum.
 
Darn. Fragged again.

Today, 06:24 PM
Into the Night
Verified User

This message is hidden because Into the Night is on your ignore list.
 
Into the Night said:
No, he hasn't. Biden didn't get investigated until recently.
Investigation of Biden's antics are now widening to include Obama AND Hillary.
Click to expand...

Of course Biden didn’t get investigated until recently. No one cared until he became a candidate and threat to Trump. This is simply a replay of the Hillary affair, only this time it won’t work
 
Adolf_Twitler said:
I never said Nancy was the one doing the investigations- If that is what you think I meant, you are too stupid for me to deal with.

Get real dude!

Show us the law in the Constitution, that says the House has to take a vote on impeachment before they do an investigation!
Click to expand...

well, the constitution does say the power of impeachment is in the House of Representatives........Nancy is not mentioned.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top