Let's watch 'em SQUIRM: PELOSI wants vote on moving IMPEACHMENT phase public

I kind of figured. You are a progressive. If no one does it for you, it will not get done.

You made a claim and you cannot back it up so you expect me to do it for you and you make the comment above?

roflmao.gif
 
A vote to make the impeachment inquisition public lol?

Lemme guess, this is kind of a test-vote to see if an *actual* vote might clear the House. I knew they met this morning.

Why the vote, Nancy? Just make it public. Why do you need other members votes *now*?
Duh. To force the hands of the Republicans
 
Still fishing, eh?......haven't found squat to charge him with on anything yet.

I actually called it this morning lol.

House Democrats needed to ‘do something’ because voters are getting bored with it. Well, the ‘something’ turned out to be Pelosi’s call for a totally unnecessary vote. If Pelosi can call for an ‘impeachment inquiry’ by simple decree—she hardly needs anyone’s permission to make the inquiry public.

This is not even good Kabuki theater.
 
A vote to make the impeachment inquisition public lol?

Lemme guess, this is kind of a test-vote to see if an *actual* vote might clear the House. I knew they met this morning.

Why the vote, Nancy? Just make it public. Why do you need other members votes *now*?

Several RWers' talking points include some idea that the committees' subpoenas are unenforceable unless the House has voted to begin impeachment proceedings. So now they will be, if that rumor is true.

Be careful what you wish for, 'cause you're gonna get it.
 
Several RWers' talking points include some idea that the committees' subpoenas are unenforceable unless the House has voted to begin impeachment proceedings. So now they will be, if that rumor is true.

Be careful what you wish for, 'cause you're gonna get it.

Trump will do the same thing Bill Clinton did if he's impeached. He'll laugh at them and finish his second term.
 
Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
Several RWers' talking points include some idea that the committees' subpoenas are unenforceable unless the House has voted to begin impeachment proceedings. So now they will be, if that rumor is true.

Be careful what you wish for, 'cause you're gonna get it.
its exactly what we wished for......and we got it.......if Nancy has the votes, that is........now, all the rules of an impeachment procedure will be in place.......including the right of Republican committee members to issue subpoenas too.......
 
VERY smart move by Nancy, there goes the 'process' argument Trump and his bots have pinned all their hopes on...……….POOF!


now what, committing various felonies isn't actually against the law?

or have they already done that?

You just said she didn’t have to. Now you say it is brilliant

Laughabke
 
Let's get a count for every single REPUBLICAN who screamed about behind closed doors. Let's see how they vote! Anyone wanna take bets on the results?


Pelosi announces vote on moving impeachment proceedings to the public phase

sqdavidbadash.gif

Published
1 min ago on
October 28, 2019
By David Badash, The New Civil Rights Movement


House-Speaker-Nancy-Pelosi.jpg

[FONT=&]Democrats have announced the US House of Representatives will vote on formal impeachment procedures Thursday.

[FONT=&]House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) said it would “ensure transparency and provide a clear path forward” as the investigation continues. “This is the right thing to do for the institution,” he said, as The Washington Post reports...


https://www.rawstory.com/2019/10/pe...-impeachment-proceedings-to-the-public-phase/[/FONT]












[/FONT]

I wonder why? They have been "baited" again.....either way, TRUMP gets his way. The left was publicly "shamed" into holding an up/down vote. If the vote fails.....game over. If it passes and the house passes it to the senate...game over, as a real hearing with real discovery and the rule of law will be enforced...revealing the fact, THERE WAS NO LAW BROKEN by Mr. Trump. Anyone? Name the US CODE LAW that MR. TRUMP supposedly breeched? Again...anyone, just present the US CODE that finds it against the law for a POTUS to conduct foreign policy....any way he wishes....to fire anyone he wishes, to command the military...and take out the 2 top ISIS agents? Again....anyone? Where is there a law that declares that a POTUS must seek advisory from the House of Representatives before ordering a strike in an area that was engaged and started by the last administration?


What I find really amusing? Both AA NANCY and SHITLESS going to the "sandbox" during a time period they ASSUMED a cease fire was in effect and the US was in a state of withdrawing from Syria. FUNNY AS HELL....its just another quinky dink that FANCY and SHITLESS both were in the area when they thought it was safe to communicate hands on with their hired mercs…...ISIS:cool:

THEY WERE TRUMPED....its nothing but poetic justice that FANCY and SHITLESS drew both high targets out into the open......and was never told (so they could not leak to the times again alerting the target of what was happening). They had this same target in their sights before.....and "somehow"...the TIMES leaked out the mission to the world. This time...neither the CIA or the house was allowed privy to the upcoming action....and guess what? The 2 top leaders of ISIS were killed and a SHITLOAD of intel plus 2 live captives were realized.

Facts TRUMP bullshit. You don't find it strange that FANCY and SHITLESS decided to go to the area where both al-Baghdadi and al-Jumaili were killed because they thought it was now safe to come out into the open? Really?

Both corrupt left wing politicians were in the sand box (JORDON)....if nothing else violating the LOGAN ACT in an attempt to undermine the Foreign Policy of the POTUS at best....at worse....relaying a message that it was safe for both terrorist leaders to make a move and get the hell out of dodge. Both arrived in Jordon at the same time that the terrorists were MOVING out in the open? Both Shitless and Fancy were there specifically to discuss SYRIA and the dangers of ISIS.....

I guess....ISIS will have its hands full for a while attempting to figure what the hell just happened....when they were assured it was SAFE there was a ceasefire.

TRUMPED AGAIN. Better impeach him quick before the quinky dinks line up with the FACTS.:bigthink:
 
Last edited:
I actually called it this morning lol.

House Democrats needed to ‘do something’ because voters are getting bored with it. Well, the ‘something’ turned out to be Pelosi’s call for a totally unnecessary vote. If Pelosi can call for an ‘impeachment inquiry’ by simple decree—she hardly needs anyone’s permission to make the inquiry public.

This is not even good Kabuki theater.

True enough. She's running out of routines...more like a stale vaudeville act.
 
Back
Top