Another impeachment show trial "witness" caught lying

[artichoke]

My question is HOW long are they going to let this sh*t show go on? The Dim Dems obviously have NOTHING impeachable to charge our president with. It's a total waste of everyone and everything involved in this charade. The Dems should be concentrating on coming up with solid issues and policies that would actually challenge conservative ideas and President Trump. But NO, the ONLY platform the Dim Dems seem to be riding on is, "We HATE Trump, orange man BAD."

They can't run on policy. Democrat-run places are disasters and everything they stand for has a long track record of complete failure. So they run on hate, persecution, and abuses of power.

That isn't going to change.

 

[artichoke]

I read where some republican senators WANT this to go to trial because so far the poll numbers are helping Trump and republicans.

Plus, they’ll have access to the WB and Hunter Biden.

The only problem with this is Democrats get to cherry-pick and coach the only witnesses who get to speak. It has to be THAT rigged in order to prop this debunked BS up.

 

[artichoke]

I don't mind if the WB and Hunter testify. The Hunter Biden thing is just a smoke screen anyway. Are RWs going to be happy if Mulvaney, Bolton and Pompeo testify?

Yes, there could be no possible reason to investigate the most notoriously corrupt company in the country coming under investigation and then deciding to start paying Biden's completely unqualified son $50k per month to to literally nothing for them while Biden oversaw U.S.-Ukraine policy.

Nothing to see here. Move along.

View attachment 12782

Who spoon-feeds you these idiot talking points? Ever consider thinking for yourself?

 

[artichoke]

Democrats have backed off on Bolton.

Maybe they’re afraid he’ll ‘spill the wrong beans’ lol.

But here’s Fiona Hill ‘spilling some beans’:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1197628373410947078

Did Ms. Hill just imply that Hillary/DNC/Democrat Media were unwitting Russian stooges?

Wait, Democrats keep telling us that this woman saying something must mean it's true, even if we have Buzzfeed, CBS News, Politico, and every other source proving that she lied. By their logic, it must now be infallible truth that Russians tried to hurt both sides (which everyone but factually-challenged Democrats already knew)...and it was DEMOCRATS doing their bidding this entire time.

Congratulations, Democrats.

You've advanced Russia's "divide and conquer" strategy like a pro. YOU are the treason. YOU are the assault on "our democracy." YOU are the ones betraying America, the people, and the Constitution (par for the course). Who knew, the gullible idiot conspiracy theorists detecting Russia behind every shadow were the REAL Russian agents?



View attachment 12783

 

[artichoke]

The problem is that trump singled out the son of a campaign rival and not just any random American working there. trump himself had a corrupt American with Ukraine ties head his campaign team in 2016. Now the GOP is raising the question that despite all the evidence against Manafort, the ledgers may have been doctored.

Wrong. The problem is that Democrats presume they can commit blatant felonies and are somehow shielded by the fact that facing any consequences whatsoever requires being investigated by their rivals. You don't get to hide behind that. Just don't be a corrupt, cheating scumbag in the first place.

View attachment 12784

And the "evidence" against Manafort, manufactured by Ukraine, was ALWAYS incredibly shady and unverified. But that didn't stop him from being utterly crucified for not giving the FBI dirt on Trump...the exact opposite of how Clinton's associates were treated during the "investigation" into her PROVABLE, HUNDRED-PLUS felonies (they were given immunity, taken at their word despite incontrovertible proof of their crimes, and the FBI even helped them destroy the evidence).

View attachment 12785

 

[artichoke]

Well, well, well.......look who was against aiding the Ukrainian military.............................

OPINIONS

How aiding the Ukrainian military could push Putin into a regional war


By Fiona Hill and
Clifford Gaddy
February 5, 2015

Fiona Hill is the director of the Center on the United States and Europe at the Brookings Institution. Clifford Gaddy is a senior fellow in the center. They are co-authors of the book “Mr. Putin: Operative in the Kremlin.”

The United States is on a dangerous trajectory in its relations with Russia, a nuclear superpower that believes itself to be under direct threat. Several former U.S. officials and top think-tank experts released a report calling on the West to provide military support to Ukraine. (Two of them, our colleagues at the Brookings Institution, expanded on the report a week ago on this page [“Ukraine needs the West’s help now”].) The logic of sending weapons to Ukraine seems straightforward and is the same as the logic for economic sanctions: to change Vladi*mir Putin’s “calculus.” Increasing the Ukrainian army’s fighting capacity, the thinking goes, would allow it to kill more rebels and Russian soldiers, generating a backlash in Russia and ultimately forcing the Russian president to the negotiating table.

We strongly disagree. The evidence points in a different direction. If we follow the recommendations of this report, the Ukrainians won’t be the only ones caught in an escalating military conflict with Russia.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...7d6_story.html

A partisan left-wing Brookings operative who has already been caught blatantly lying under oath...now turns out to also have been lying about what she was fighting for over there to begin with...just to vilify and smear Trump.



Excellent find. Democrat hypocrisy and malfeasance truly knows no bounds.

 

[Darth Omar]

Wait, Democrats keep telling us that this woman saying something must mean it's true, even if we have Buzzfeed, CBS News, Politico, and every other source proving that she lied. By their logic, it must now be infallible truth that Russians tried to hurt both sides (which everyone but factually-challenged Democrats already knew)...and it was DEMOCRATS doing their bidding this entire time.

Congratulations, Democrats.

You've advanced Russia's "divide and conquer" strategy like a pro. YOU are the treason. YOU are the assault on "our democracy." YOU are the ones betraying America, the people, and the Constitution (par for the course). Who knew, the gullible idiot conspiracy theorists detecting Russia behind every shadow were the REAL Russian agents?

Indeed, comrade lol.

Whatever the Steele Dossier contained—it originated in RUSSIA, and it’s like it never once occurred to any of them [them, being the Resistance, Democrats, their media arm, Never Trumpers and etc] that just maybe, just maybe, the Dossier was Russian propaganda intended to disrupt our politics.

And did it ever. Myself and others suggested that distinct possibility till we were blue in the face only to have it fall on deaf ears. And what do you know, one of the Democrats star witnesses makes the same claim, in what is arguably the BIG MOMENT in this whole affair.

And why wasn’t she interviewed by Mullet? Why wasn’t Fiona Hill’s name to be found anywhere in Mullet’s report?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1197550523735363585

 

[artichoke]

Lying is what he does. He's got this whole kind of spin routine going like he's practicing to attempt a job at political talk show punditry. The first key to him is he always has to hide his links.

Hence the Buzzfeed, CBS News, Politico, and every other article I've posted PROVING that this DEMOCRAT ACTIVIST lied through her teeth under oath. But go ahead, by all means, keep closing your eyes, covering your ears, and shouting, "Lies! Lies I tell you! All lies!" over the proof. I'm sure that, among Democrats, that will pass for a serious counterpoint.

View attachment 12787



Again, conservatives operate on proof, facts, and logic...and Democrats operate on emotional hysteria, conspiracy theories, and personal attacks. Thanks for demonstrating once again.

 

[artichoke]

Buckle up buttercup, the ride is going to get pretty rough for you liberal democrats!
Im going to be laughing pretty hard (at you) when Trump wipes that smug grin of your face in 2020.

I don't think it's a smug grin. It's a fake grin of desperation.

View attachment 12786

 

[Earl]

So the Democrat sources in the OP are all lying? And the court ruling confirming it...was in on the conspiracy as well?



Says the guy who just contradicted DEMOCRAT SOURCES and court rulings to lie...while misspelling basic words...speaking of discrediting yourself.

Indeed.

“Loose.”

Lol

 

[artichoke]

Maybe Obama took Hill’s advice so that’s why he sent blankets instead of arms to Ukraine lol.

But if Trump sent blankets he Putin’s puppet blah-blah-blah. In my mind, it’s insanity to risk a shooting war with Russia over Ukraine...or Syria.

The other thing we learned from Hill’s testimony is that [she thinks, at least] the Russians were out to hobble either a Hillary or Trump presidency—no matter who won and their means to hobble Trump was with the Steele Dossier!

Instead of just increasing cyber security and the like—how about we be a nation of less-gullible fools so we don’t get played by the Russians?

Honestly, this was already clear from the fact that they promoted Bernie AND Trump simultaneously. It was about dividing America and Democrats proved to be exactly the kind of easily-led useful idiots they needed.

Mission: Accomplished for Putin, thanks to his Democrat allies.

 

[artichoke]

Indeed, comrade lol.

Whatever the Steele Dossier contained—it originated in RUSSIA, and it’s like it never once occurred to any of them [them, being the Resistance, Democrats, their media arm, Never Trumpers and etc] that just maybe, just maybe, the Dossier was Russian propaganda intended to disrupt our politics.

And did it ever. Myself and others suggested that distinct possibility till we were blue in the face only to have it fall on deaf ears. And what do you know, one of the Democrats star witnesses makes the same claim, in what is arguably the BIG MOMENT in this whole affair.

And why wasn’t she interviewed by Mullet? Why wasn’t Fiona Hill’s name to be found anywhere in Mullet’s report?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1197550523735363585

Another important find. Nothing discredits her like the Levin Tweet. The thinking adults are on fire today.

 

[Althea]

Why are lefties so defensive when it comes to Solomon’s *sourced* reporting on Ukraine?

I think the real question is 'why are Righties so willing to accept the word of propagandists?'

 

[Southern Chicken]

I think the real question is 'why are Righties so willing to accept the word of propagandists?'

You mean like this?
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/adam-schiff-pranked-by-russians-who-offered-nude-photos-of-trump

 

[Earl]

I think the real question is 'why are Righties so willing to accept the word of propagandists?'

Did Southern Chicken show you the light?

 

[Althea]

How do you know that every repub believed the Russians meddled, just because that was the official position of the govt.? It's not cut and dried.

An example of false belief: the official position of the govt. is that 9/11 was an al-Qaeda operation yet some U.S. pols still thought it was an inside job.

trump sided with Putin over U.S intelligence agencies.

Lost in all of this impeachment talk is the fact that every trump move seems to benefit Putin. Why is nobody asking about that?

 

[Althea]

The *mainstream* republican position is that Russia meddled but the ‘Russian effect’ was either insignificant or unquantifiable.

You may note that’s consistent with Mullet’s conclusion.

And there’s more than ample evidence that the Ukrainians meddled FOR Hillary and AGAINST Trump that’s hardly a ‘conspiracy theory’. Maybe not to the same extent as the Russians [whatever the hell that ‘extent’ was] but foreign meddling is foreign meddling.

No it isn't.


No, there isn't.

 

[Althea]

I'll take the word of Fiona Hill and others who've actually been to Ukraine, and who stated unequivocally that trump's Ukraine narrative is fictional.

trump's Ukraine narrative, was that Putin was within his rights to annex Crimea. (hmmm...why would Ukraine support Hillary?) It was also that NATO should be disbanded.

Not much more needs to be said.

 

[Althea]

My question is HOW long are they going to let this sh*t show go on? The Dim Dems obviously have NOTHING impeachable to charge our president with. It's a total waste of everyone and everything involved in this charade. The Dems should be concentrating on coming up with solid issues and policies that would actually challenge conservative ideas and President Trump. But NO, the ONLY platform the Dim Dems seem to be riding on is, "We HATE Trump, orange man BAD."

This has nothing to do with getting rid of trump. We NEED him in office next year if we want to finally get rid of his criminal enterprise.

This is about using the power of Congress to uncover evidence of his crimes.

It's working. Stay tuned...Stone was just the first domino.

 

[Althea]

I’ll tell what’s confusing—the Schiff hearings lol.

Pretend you know nothing about the issue and watch it.

Pretend it's Hillary being scrutinized for the same exact actions.

How does it look to you now?