I think that was Nunes. he only had 5 minutes to cross.
Also he was interested in who leaked the SD to Fiona -so he was prioritizing i guess
Study debunks Democrat conspiracy theory about Russians stealing the election
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
Also he was interested in who leaked the SD to Fiona -so he was prioritizing i guess
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
I don't believe in all of the Democratic party ideas. I think they're wrong for wanting open borders, healthcare for illegals, a minimum wage, no freedom of association, and unnecessary war.
evince
Truthmatters
you are here to trash the candidate the Democratic party picks after pretending to be on the left for your whole gig
I have seen it over and over
mark my words whomever we pick you will hate and spew Russian talking point lies about them
you are transparent
all that crap you just spewed is fucking right wing talking points you Bag O Dicks
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
I'll say right now I dislike most of the Democrat nominees, but they are all better than Trump. Whoever the nominee is, I'm going to vote for.
The reason I agree with the Right on some things is because I think for myself. You're an NPC, so you agree with the Left on everything.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Study: Russian Trolls Don’t Actually Influence Americans In Any Meaningful Way? BULLSHIT!!
Listen up idiot and pay close attention.
All the Russian trolls have to do is put a Conspiracy Theory bug in Donald Trump's ear- and he gets up on his stump- and preached that conspiracy theory to you idiots who believe anything and everything Donald Trump says.
SO basically what we have here is an idiot leading idiots stupider than he is- and you are one stupid idiot for believing his shit!
Idiot! LOL
evince
Truthmatters
dear fucking Idiot,
Steele is ALSO a Russian expert
"being played"
was her take on how lie filled the Putin Russia is asshole
STEELE knows MORE than she does about Russia as he was at a higher level of work and got MORE secret intel than HER over his lifes work
oh and BTY our entire INTEL system gets HIGHER of intel access than her too
YET YOU TRASH ALL THEIR EXPERTICE
you side with Putin
fuck you very much
evince
Truthmatters
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
100%
Saying Russian trolls don't influence Americans is ignoring how prone the Right is to conspiracy theories. All they need to do is read some meme saying that Biden had a Ukrainian investigator fired to protect his son, and that's it, that's all they need to parrot the lie over and over.
You have no clue whether Russia won the election for Trump. You think a person is going to change his mind because of crazy claims in Facebook memes?
How do you know it was a Russian post rather than a post by the Republican party, Trump campaign organization, PAC, conservative group, or just some individual that influenced somebody's vote? Anybody can post on Facebook.
The government brought prosecutions against Russian interference in 2018. Was that interference responsible for the Democratic gains?
They really did not have to change even 80,000 votes since Trump could have lost two more states and still won the electoral college.
View attachment 12990
EXACTLY. Democrats repeated Russian disinformation till they were blue in the face, accomplishing Putin's objective of dividing the country, like good little Russian pawns...all while hyperventilating about everyone else being secret Russian agents.
That Russian disinformation included blaming Ukraine for interfering in the election.
If the right is subject to conspiracy theories they were already voting for Trump (because they are on the right) and their vote was not influenced by Russians.
evince
Truthmatters
8 U.S. Intelligence Groups Blame Russia for Meddling, but ...
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/07/16/us/elections/russian-interference...
Jul 16, 2018 · 8 U.S. Intelligence Groups Blame Russia for Meddling, but Trump Keeps Clouding the Picture. On Thursday, the heads of the national security agencies said that Russia was still trying to influence and disrupt the midterm elections in the United States. Their pointed statements contradicted President Trump, who has continued to cast doubt on the role Russia played in the 2016 presidential election.
What does our meddling have to do with the issue of whether Russia influenced our election?
evince
Truthmatters
Senate Intelligence report finds 'extensive' Russian election interference
The bipartisan report found that the U.S. election infrastructure was unprepared for attacks and offers proposals to shore up the system ahead of 2020.
Breaking News Emails
Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.
SUBSCRIBE
July 25, 2019, 1:13 PM PDT
By Leigh Ann Caldwell, Heidi Przybyla and Kyle Stewart
WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan report Thursday on Russian election interference that found the U.S. election infrastructure was unprepared to combat “extensive activity” by Russia that began in 2014 and carried on at least into 2017.
The report was issued just one day after former special counsel Robert Mueller warned U.S. lawmakers that he believes Russia will seek to interfere again in the 2020 campaign and that “many more countries” are also developing similar capabilities.
“In 2016, the U.S. was unprepared at all levels of government for a concerted attack from a determined foreign adversary on our election infrastructure,” Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.
The 61-page report — based on interviews with state election officials, Obama administration officials and government and intelligence community officials — is just the first volume of the findings of the committee's investigation. It includes eight pages of recommendations to shore up the country’s election infrastructure to prevent future interference.
The report found that the Russians took advantage of the nation's decentralized voting system, “exploiting seams” between federal oversight and state election systems. It also found that election cybersecurity was “sorely lacking” in 2016 and that federal attempts to warn states about potential security breaches "did not provide enough information or go to the appropriate people."
Election databases weren’t as secure as they should be, according to the report, and aging voting machines with no paper trail were vulnerable.
evince
Truthmatters
why does the republican party deny this reality?
evince
Truthmatters
Senate Intelligence report finds 'extensive' Russian election interference
The bipartisan report found that the U.S. election infrastructure was unprepared for attacks and offers proposals to shore up the system ahead of 2020.
Breaking News Emails
Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.
SUBSCRIBE
July 25, 2019, 1:13 PM PDT
By Leigh Ann Caldwell, Heidi Przybyla and Kyle Stewart
WASHINGTON — The Senate Intelligence Committee released a bipartisan report Thursday on Russian election interference that found the U.S. election infrastructure was unprepared to combat “extensive activity” by Russia that began in 2014 and carried on at least into 2017.
The report was issued just one day after former special counsel Robert Mueller warned U.S. lawmakers that he believes Russia will seek to interfere again in the 2020 campaign and that “many more countries” are also developing similar capabilities.
“In 2016, the U.S. was unprepared at all levels of government for a concerted attack from a determined foreign adversary on our election infrastructure,” Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement.
The 61-page report — based on interviews with state election officials, Obama administration officials and government and intelligence community officials — is just the first volume of the findings of the committee's investigation. It includes eight pages of recommendations to shore up the country’s election infrastructure to prevent future interference.
The report found that the Russians took advantage of the nation's decentralized voting system, “exploiting seams” between federal oversight and state election systems. It also found that election cybersecurity was “sorely lacking” in 2016 and that federal attempts to warn states about potential security breaches "did not provide enough information or go to the appropriate people."
Election databases weren’t as secure as they should be, according to the report, and aging voting machines with no paper trail were vulnerable.
why does the republican party deny this?