Into the Night
Contributor
Hunter Biden is not charged with anything nor is on trial. Nor is a witness to any abuse of power that Trump committed.
Moron.
Uh...yes he is.
Hunter Biden is not charged with anything nor is on trial. Nor is a witness to any abuse of power that Trump committed.
Moron.
He can do so for any reason whatsoever. He doesn't need to 'justify' it.Under no conditions was trump justified in withholding aid.
Nope. It was never withheld.Could it be just a coincidence that this aid was released immediately after the whistleblower came forward.
He didn't, but he can if he wants to, and for any reason.Please show us, my dear, where trump was justified in withholding aid payments approved by congress.
Obviously you don't care about the corruption of Biden or Obama.You did hear Mr. Parnas say that everything was about investigating Biden, no one cared about corruption.
One...the announcement is NOT necessary. Trump was impeached the moment the House passed the first article of impeachment.
Two...the House Managers (not the House Leaders)...DELIVERED (not announced)...the articles of impeachment to the Senate yesterday.
Your comments were made today.
See what happens when you shoot your mouth off and don't know what the hell you are talking about?
the announcement is NOT necessary. Trump was impeached the moment the House passed the first article of impeachment.

There is no justification for blackmail.
trump could NOT hold up aid to Ukraine- period.
Oh, stop acting the silly. Trump was Impeached the second the vote of Impeachment was concluded. Learn your civics, dude.
Bullshit. He was still blackmailing Zelensky.
I'm fine with Bolton and Mulvaney.Mulvaney had a "drug deal" with your Star witness, Sondland.
Trump's testimony has already been provided; we've all read the transcript.
OTOH, Joe Biden's response to any questions about Hunter's job at Burisma, ... has been .. HOW DARE YOU ... ask me that question.![]()
The terms are "abuse of power" and "obstruction of Congress", which has nothing to do with the Bidens.
I misused the term. It was extortion and abuse of power. Toss in obstruction of Congress. The Bidens and their testimony are irrelevant. You're desperately grasping at straws.
IF Trump was extorting Zelensky and if Hunter Biden is dirty, it’s a pox on both houses, and that adds up to acquittal.
AND it opens up a whole ‘nother can of worms on what was going on in Ukraine under Obama.
Senate Democrats are taking a risk if they vote for witnesses.

Not how it works. The prosecutor calls his witnesses as well as the defendant. However, the defendant usually has witnesses that pertain to his case. The rightys want to call the Bidens. They have zero to do with the case. If the Reds want Biden, who is running against Trump, it would be fair to call Trump too. Trump did this to get a political advantage over Joe. Calling just him might do that. In the interest of fair play, Trump would have to testify too.
you are not interested in fair play at all.
How is Hunter Biden relevant to anything regardless of how dirty he might be?
Let me interrupt your confidence with my expertise. Witnesses are always a gamble, and the Bidens are not worth the bet for the GOP. But some of them will try it anyway.
if Jesus was going to testify would you let him swear to the oath "so help me God"?.....
Biden is not a witness to any of Trump’s transgressions.
Things are swinging the Dems' way. Let's see if that continues.


Repetitious Question Already Answered. RQAA
Things are swinging the Dems' way. Let's see if that continues.
