Your opinion, nothing based on facts.
End of the line for noted traitor Robert E Lee
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
jimmymccready
Verified User
Your myth of Palestinian homeland does not fly, period.
OK.. makes sense..what does Iran want back in return for "support"? anything political? terrorism?
I'm having trouble seeing what they get for their Palestinian support money (as are Iranian citizens)
Not the first time Democrats have pushed historical revisionism.
moon
Satire for Sanity
You're insane.
Iolo/Penderyn
Verified User
Eh?
moon
Satire for Sanity
jimmymccready
Verified User
from Phantasmal's link
Palestine continued to be a war-torn and much-contested region up through World War II when, afterwards, the United Nations declared the area the State of Israel and established it as a homeland for the Jewish people. This mandate by the United Nations, and the resulting country of Israel, remains controversial and the region continues to be as troubled in the present day as it was in ancient times.
Palestine continued to be a war-torn and much-contested region up through World War II when, afterwards, the United Nations declared the area the State of Israel and established it as a homeland for the Jewish people. This mandate by the United Nations, and the resulting country of Israel, remains controversial and the region continues to be as troubled in the present day as it was in ancient times.
Iolo/Penderyn
Verified User
The number of Jews living in Palestine was very small indeed until Asquith set up a 'National Home' to get Zionist money during the First War, and whatever that meant it was not a Zionist nation state. The UK gave up its mandate over Palestine because of the murderous terrorism of the intellectual ancestors of Netenyahu, and the Zionists bribed enough poor countries to get their colony established, while the USA and the Soviet Union were desperate to avoid taking displaced persons and, in the case of the USSR, to get rid of an informed potential opposition. The Zionists were able to drive out much of the native population because the British had previously defeated a Palestinian Rising to protect Jews, and because the intervention of other states was mostly gesture stuff. It is not a very glorious history. The only British anti-Semite I have ever met to talk to rather than fight was one of our teachers, whose best friend had been murdered by Zionist terrorists, and his body booby-trapped with explosives, to kill more of the soldiers who'd fought Hitler. It is not a glorious story!
Airstrip One
Completely Effed
They should re-name Fort Benning to Fort Sherman.
moon
Satire for Sanity
The United nations didn't declare ' the State of Israel'. The Zionist terrorists declared it UNILATERALLY in 1948. When president Truman was asked to recognize ' the Jewish State ' he crossed it out and replaced it with ' State of Israel '.
If they'd have known that it would become an apartheid state for racist fascists - as was warned- then NOBODY WOULD HAVE RECOGNIZED IT AT ALL.
Henry Benning had no doubt why he fought the Civil War, and it was not about "states rights" or taxes.
Benning, "What was the reason that induced Georgia to take the step of secession? This reason may be summed up in one single proposition. It was a conviction, a deep conviction on the part of Georgia, that a separation from the North-was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery."
http://civilwarcauses.org/benningva.htm
jimmymccready
Verified User
The Arabs and Palestinians foment their own form of "Lost Cause," and like the revisions in America, the Arabs are losing the propaganda campaign, too.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Most Izraelis are racists. Anybody supporting them is also a racist. Palestinian lives matter. White Izraeli suppression and occupation must cease.
jimmymccready
Verified User
Thank you, moon.PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello Dutch Uncle,
No, the correct solution was to move beyond the slavery that held the southern economy BACK, and amend the Constitution. It was amended much later anyway. Would have been far better to just do it right away. Look at all the trouble that mistake caused. We are still plagued by it today.
The southern pre-war slave economy is a tribute to why it is a problem when wealth inequality becomes too extreme. Zero progress. Locked into an economic model that worked for only a few. But those few had all the power and they liked their situation so much they refused to progress. They tried to stay locked into a past which benefited them, and they were afraid of ordinary life without all the perks they enjoyed.
The slave economy prevented a robust economy because there were almost no jobs, no hiring. Most labor was simply purchased. The north had factories, jobs and consumer spending. The north inevitably grew much stronger than the south, the south felt threatened, and tried to fight for it's antiquated and cruel way of life. That's why we had the Civil War, basically.
No, the correct solution was to move beyond the slavery that held the southern economy BACK, and amend the Constitution. It was amended much later anyway. Would have been far better to just do it right away. Look at all the trouble that mistake caused. We are still plagued by it today.
The southern pre-war slave economy is a tribute to why it is a problem when wealth inequality becomes too extreme. Zero progress. Locked into an economic model that worked for only a few. But those few had all the power and they liked their situation so much they refused to progress. They tried to stay locked into a past which benefited them, and they were afraid of ordinary life without all the perks they enjoyed.
The slave economy prevented a robust economy because there were almost no jobs, no hiring. Most labor was simply purchased. The north had factories, jobs and consumer spending. The north inevitably grew much stronger than the south, the south felt threatened, and tried to fight for it's antiquated and cruel way of life. That's why we had the Civil War, basically.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Well said jimmymccready,
and hello Dutch Uncle,
"Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready:
SC fireing of Ft Sumter was the act of Southern Aggression that started the war by assaulting federal property but more importantly on Old Glory.
The attack on the US flag turned enough northern Democrats to Lincoln to give him surety to order out the northern and western milias.
The war killed more than 700000 people, including civilians, and the South is responsible for all of it."
It is entirely true.
and hello Dutch Uncle,
"Quote Originally Posted by jimmymccready:
SC fireing of Ft Sumter was the act of Southern Aggression that started the war by assaulting federal property but more importantly on Old Glory.
The attack on the US flag turned enough northern Democrats to Lincoln to give him surety to order out the northern and western milias.
The war killed more than 700000 people, including civilians, and the South is responsible for all of it."
It is entirely true.