Do you?
Political partisans lie. They lied about Zimmerman and they lie about political opponents. It should be no surprise that the political extremists on this forum, both Left and Right, will lie about Rittenhouse. The good news is that the court won't allow 90% of the bullshit posted on this forum.
Like with Zimmerman, I think justice will be done. The problem for Rittenhouse is that there are multiple charges here and I doubt he's innocent of all of them from the limited evidence available. The good news for him is he was 17 at the time. This could save him a few years in prison.
I'm just pointing out that the three rioters he shot were:
A sex offender engaged in acts of arson
A repeat offender with felony convictions for violence
A convicted burglar in possession of an illegal firearm
It is going to be a long, ugly road with a lot of lies, and probably more violence. trump will be cheering on the violence all the way.
A good reason for more Americans to buy guns and become proficient with their use. Freedom isn't free. If you want to stop fascists, be ready to do it with a bullet. When the Civil War comes, be ready to kill those who hate America.
Don't you?
Rittenhouse's lawyer is claiming treason as a defense for murder.
When the Civil War comes, be ready to kill those who hate America.
Posted that weeks ago in current events, and the Super mod put it in conspiracy theories!
Do you think having a criminal record justifies murder, Senior Chief?
A good reason for more Americans to buy guns and become proficient with their use. Freedom isn't free. If you want to stop fascists, be ready to do it with a bullet. When the Civil War comes, be ready to kill those who hate America.
![]()
That's because they ARE no different than the Taliban, Al Queda, ISIS, the KKK, or any other groups who think that it's okay to murder ppl as long as you can "prove" that they had some sort of prior brush with the law. What's next? Stoning ppl for adultery? Beheading thieves?
Doubtful this will go away. Zimmerman was a classic self-defense case. Rittenhouse fired into a crowd. Three people shot, two dead. I strongly doubt all three can be filed under "self-defense". Even if the video evidence clears him of each shooting, the mere act of firing into a crowd falls under reckless endangerment, illegal discharge of a weapon and who knows what else.
Are you going to rise up or continue to hide under your bed like a sniveling coward?
This is patently untrue. Rittenhouse fired on three people. He killed two of them, and wounded the third. In each case, the person fired on was attacking him physically or threatened him with a deadly weapon. You can see in video after Rittenhouse shot Grosskreutz that he aimed at another person who put his hands up. Rittenhouse didn't shoot or even fire at that guy.
![]()
You can see the guy he didn't shoot to the right of Grosskreutz standing in this picture. Grosskreutz has a pistol out and is pointing it at Rittenhouse who shoots him. Rittenhouse then stands up and points his rifle at the other guy in the photo. That guy puts his hands up and Rittenhouse turns and runs towards police.
Most definitely. I lived for killing bad guys and ridding the planet of scumbags. It's good for our nation, good for the gene pool and it's very satisfying.
Legally, I have to wait for the Civil War before it becomes open season on Nazis, KKK and other anti-American assholes, but if they commit suicide, by their own hand or by cop, so much the better.
![]()