The persons Rittenhouse shot were all criminal felons with records...

It was great that Rittenhouse was able to get the people he murdered in cold blood's records. That was very quick of him.
 
Too bad for them the law calls that murder. What self-defense is there when you travel to the protestors packing war arms? Unless they pulled a gun on you, the answer is absolutely none. Even if they did, he's walking around like a Rambo wannabe. I'd call self-defense on those being purposefully threatened with brandished arms. When will the guns on high worshippers realize brandishing weapons like that makes you a threat to people's lives? Police do the same when someone brandishes a weapon. Of course, they cheer for the police this time. Seems these guys have truly lost all sense thanks to the propaganda fueling them.

According to both witnesses and video, Rittenhouse and company were brandishing their weapons at people and taunting them. In most places that is still illegal.
 
According to both witnesses and video, Rittenhouse and company were brandishing their weapons at people and taunting them. In most places that is still illegal.

That too, if true, will also come out in court. There should be no doubt there are hours of video from that night, not just the short clips posted by the political extremists.
 
That too, if true, will also come out in court. There should be no doubt there are hours of video from that night, not just the short clips posted by the political extremists.

Hopefully #TRE45ON will be gone before the trial. I can easily see him issuing a pardon, can't you?
 
They also tend to be all hat and no cattle... much like the Reichwingers here.

Agreed. Keyboard warriors. Great for drinking beer and talking about "the good ol' days" but not worth much outside the club shack.

Even so, I advise all good Americans to arm themselves and to be ready to shoot fascists when they attack. It's self-defense as this thread notes Kyle did.
 
Agreed. Keyboard warriors. Great for drinking beer and talking about "the good ol' days" but not worth much outside the club shack.

Even so, I advise all good Americans to arm themselves and to be ready to shoot fascists when they attack. It's self-defense as this thread notes Kyle did.

What's funny is the cunt that made the claim is the one that hides on this forum. In other words, she's all hat and no cattle.

What's worse is you agree with her which means you're exactly the same. You talk big about what you'd do but you'd shit your pants if face to face.

I'm a good American and rest assured I'm armed.
 
... I'm a good American and rest assured I'm armed.
Disagreed that you are good anything...well, maybe good for nothing. You being armed is why it will be justifiable self-defense.

I can't disclaim something I didn't say. Go fuck you goddamn n-lover.
Hundreds of posts like this are proof you are emotionally unstable and probably violent. Anyone who sees you brandishing a gun will be fully justified to shoot you dead.
 
Agreed. Keyboard warriors. Great for drinking beer and talking about "the good ol' days" but not worth much outside the club shack.

Even so, I advise all good Americans to arm themselves and to be ready to shoot fascists when they attack. It's self-defense as this thread notes Kyle did.

Every now and then the 1A snowflakes here in the frozen north get extra fearful and scared, so they hold themselves a FIRST AMENDMENT RALLY (always in all caps) in town. They've shown them on the news a few times. Never more than a few dozen, if that, even show up. They march around waving their bang-bangs to let us all know they're not scared. lol

So according to the OP, if I go down there with *my* bang-bangs and take a few of them out, and it turns out (which is likely) that they had prior troubles with the law, I'm doing a great service for the people, right?

Somehow, I just don't think that the cops will see it that way. Bet a jury of my peers wouldn't, either.
 
If a person is not otherwise prohibited from possessing a firearm, it is legal to carry any legal firearm openly in Wisconsin.

Under Wisconsin statutes that say anyone under 18 who "goes armed" with any deadly weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor. Under that statute Rittenhouse, 17, was not old enough to legally carry the assault-style rifle he had.

But John Monroe, a lawyer who specializes in gun rights cases, believes an exception for rifles and shotguns, intended to allow people age 16 and 17 to hunt, could apply.

Lake County, Illinois, records suggest that at least one death will be charged as first-degree intentional homicide, which carries a mandatory life sentence. The case could resolve in a lesser charge through plea bargaining. Rittenhouse could face a reckless homicide charge in the second death,

https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/crime/2020/08/26/wisconsin-open-carry-law-kyle-rittenhouse-legally-have-gun-kenosha-protest-shooting-17-year-old/3444231001/

There is no requirement of a 17 year old to be hunting with a firearm he possesses. Wisconsin law allows any 17 year old to openly carry a rifle. No hunting requirement. No parent permission required.
The homicides were justified. Self defense is not murder.
 
The defense may try to get the deceased's and Grosskreutz's criminal records in, but I doubt it will happen. The Kenosha County DA has a history that does not bode well for fairness.

Randall P. Volar was a resident of Kenosha County when he used a website, later confiscated by the FBI, to target and traffic numerous young black women before 2018. In early 2018, he was arrested, charged, and released on bail for the trafficking of these young black girls (as young as 12).

In June 2018, after meeting one of his victims at his house, he allegedly attempted to rape her at which point Chrystul Kizer shot Volar, lit his house on fire, and fled the scene.

Kizer was arrested and charged with Volar’s murder and her bail was set at one million dollars. After nearly two years in jail, Kizer was released on a reduced bail of $400,000 which was raised from various trafficking victims and criminal justice reform organizations from around the country. While it is noted that Kizer’s trial has not publicly presented the details of the strength of the prosecution’s case, several legal groups from around the country sent letters of condemnation to DA Graveley, calling out his unprofessional and unnecessary actions with the Kizer case.

The National Lawyers Guild Chapter at Harvard sent Graveley a blistering rebuke of his handling of the Kizer case.

“Your actions to date in the Chrystul Kizer case stand in grave breach of these professional responsibilities. Chrystul was a 17-year-old girl when she killed the 34-year-old man who had been raping and physically abusing her. She deserves empathy and support for the horrible abuse she suffered at the hands of a grown man, not criminalization. “Sound discretion” and “justice” in this case would clearly look like dropping the charges so she can move on with her life and recovery. You have a duty to improve and seek reform for the prosecutor’s office, not to go to extreme lengths to prosecute cases that do not belong in the courthouse to begin with. Your insistence on prosecuting the case against the plan language meaning of the safe harbor law is bizarre and negligent. It seems to come from a place of racist fear of Chrystul, a young Black woman, and should have no place in the administration of the prosecutorial power.”




https://www.redstate.com/scotthounsell/2020/08/28/kenosha-da-has-history-prosecuting-self-defense-cases/

The DA is not the court.
 
Back
Top