Trump doesn’t plan to concede if Biden is declared president-elect ...

AssHatZombie said:
you said that already. we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Click to expand...

Nope. We won't. Because this isn't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact. Trump observers were never denied access to observe the process. Trump lawyers admitted that in court. So that was a lie. The other accusation is unproven and illogical. There was no benefit to back dating a postmark, since the ballots had to be received by election day.
 
Concart said:
since the ballots had to be received by election day.
Click to expand...

how can you be so ignorant of what is going on.......Pennsylvania is accepting ballots received for three days after the election pursuant to a judge's order changing the statute the legislature passed.....a clear violation of Bush v Gore's precedent.......
 
PostmodernProphet said:
actually, can we agree he's ignoring the truth?......
Click to expand...

Who, you and the turd in your pocket? I keep hearing this false claim that Trump observers were prevented from observing the process. That's false. You make the claim but you haven't shown any evidence that it's true. Because it isn't.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
how can you be so ignorant of what is going on.......Pennsylvania is accepting ballots received for three days after the election pursuant to a judge's order changing the statute the legislature passed.....a clear violation of Bush v Gore's precedent.......
Click to expand...

ROTFLFMAO!!! Keep your day job. Bush v. Gore has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. You are so dumb. God, it's just remarkable.
 
Concart said:
Nope. We won't. Because this isn't a matter of opinion, it is a matter of fact. Trump observers were never denied access to observe the process. Trump lawyers admitted that in court. So that was a lie. The other accusation is unproven and illogical. There was no benefit to back dating a postmark, since the ballots had to be received by election day.
Click to expand...

:okjen:
 
PostmodernProphet said:
how can you be so ignorant of what is going on.......Pennsylvania is accepting ballots received for three days after the election pursuant to a judge's order changing the statute the legislature passed.....a clear violation of Bush v Gore's precedent.......
Click to expand...

As long as they're postmarked by election day they are countable, dumbass.
 
Concart said:
Who, you and the turd in your pocket? I keep hearing this false claim that Trump observers were prevented from observing the process. That's false. You make the claim but you haven't shown any evidence that it's true. Because it isn't.
Click to expand...

no.....me and asshat......you are the turd in our pocket......
 
Concart said:
ROTFLFMAO!!! Keep your day job. Bush v. Gore has absolutely nothing to do with any of this. You are so dumb. God, it's just remarkable.
Click to expand...

???.....Bush v Gore held that the courts may not alter the election laws set by the state legislature unless they are unconstitutional.......Pennsylvania courts changed the election laws set by the state legislature........hear the echo?.......if it gets to the SC they will reject all ballots received after election day........by the way, that day job I'm keeping?.......lawyer........
 
Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
As long as they're postmarked by election day they are countable, dumbass.
Click to expand...

well, not if they are received later than the date set by the state legislature, obviously......
 
Hello ZappasGuitar,

ZappasGuitar said:
You know when it comes down to it, he will.

Trump can't STAND not being the center of attention and when he's giving his "concession speech" he will have all eyes on him, perhaps for the final time.
Click to expand...

So would we look for a sort of a 'they cheated - illegal votes - but they got away with it - don't worry, I'll be back - see you on twitter' kind of concession speech, ya think?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top