Jill Biden has a PHD

Being a soft-core porn model does not make her a slut.

But lying about having an advanced degree, lying about being fluent in five languages, and the utterly transactional nature of her marriage to an elderly fat man leads me to question her virtue and character.


The slightest semantic distinction. A mere trifle. She is the whore of babylon!
 
I'm in tears at the verbal gymnastics here. In enlightened progressive circles I'd thought you'd call it art and free expression.

I get it, you're here to troll and make partisan political points. Now you're stuck because this particular one belies supposed progressive beliefs. Thus you have to resort to lawyering like you're in court. It's funny to watch.

I think it’s art and free expression and porno.
 
Being a soft-core porn model does not make her a slut.

But lying about having an advanced degree, lying about being fluent in five languages, and the utterly transactional nature of her marriage to an elderly fat man leads me to question her virtue and character.

1000% agree

And don’t forget plagiarizing Michelle Obama’s speech.
 
"The New York Times first reported the subpoenas had been sent. There is no suggestion that Ivanka Trump accounted for the payment improperly. Representatives for the Manhattan district attorney, New York attorney general and Trump Organization declined to comment.

Ivanka Trump reacted to the Times' story Thursday evening, tweeting, "This is harassment pure and simple. This 'inquiry' by NYC democrats is 100% motivated by politics, publicity and rage. They know very well that there's nothing here and that there was no tax benefit whatsoever. These politicians are simply ruthless."
Alan Garten, general counsel of the Trump Organization, told the Times, "Everything was done in strict compliance with applicable law and under the advice of counsel and tax experts." He added, "All applicable taxes were paid and no party received any undue benefit."
cnn.com
 
"The New York Times first reported the subpoenas had been sent. There is no suggestion that Ivanka Trump accounted for the payment improperly. Representatives for the Manhattan district attorney, New York attorney general and Trump Organization declined to comment.

Ivanka Trump reacted to the Times' story Thursday evening, tweeting, "This is harassment pure and simple. This 'inquiry' by NYC democrats is 100% motivated by politics, publicity and rage. They know very well that there's nothing here and that there was no tax benefit whatsoever. These politicians are simply ruthless."
Alan Garten, general counsel of the Trump Organization, told the Times, "Everything was done in strict compliance with applicable law and under the advice of counsel and tax experts." He added, "All applicable taxes were paid and no party received any undue benefit."
cnn.com

Oopsie. You're a stupid whore.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/nyregion/trump-fraud-investigations-taxes.html
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/202...ries-include-write-offs-to-ivanka-report.html
 
Has Jill Biden published anything? I'm curious. The reason is, I have read textbooks and such by other female PhD's in education and find they are quite uniformly technical and scientific illiterates.

For example in one, written by 3 PhD's and a master's, all four female (given that teaching is heavily dominated by females right now that's probably inevitable), they were discussing electricity. At one point they described that electricity was produced in a generator and that this was "two magnets connected by a piece of wire." That is a completely idiotic and incorrect description of a generator.

A simple one sentence description that would be correct might be, A series of coils of wire that surround and interact with a rotating magnetic field.

So, I'd really like to see what Jill Biden's wrote on the subject of education, particularly STEM, if anything before passing judgement on her.
 
Has Jill Biden published anything? I'm curious. The reason is, I have read textbooks and such by other female PhD's in education and find they are quite uniformly technical and scientific illiterates.

For example in one, written by 3 PhD's and a master's, all four female (given that teaching is heavily dominated by females right now that's probably inevitable), they were discussing electricity. At one point they described that electricity was produced in a generator and that this was "two magnets connected by a piece of wire." That is a completely idiotic and incorrect description of a generator.

A simple one sentence description that would be correct might be, A series of coils of wire that surround and interact with a rotating magnetic field.

So, I'd really like to see what Jill Biden's wrote on the subject of education, particularly STEM, if anything before passing judgement on her.

What the FUCK are you talking about?
 
What the FUCK are you talking about?

Are you new to the English language? Jill Biden is a PhD in education. PhD's publish papers and books. That's part of being a PhD. I'd like to know what she's published and read some of it. The reason is, just because you have a PhD doesn't make you smart, a genius, nor particularly well educated outside a narrow field. I'd like to see where she's at knowledge-wise.
 
I'm in tears at the verbal gymnastics here. In enlightened progressive circles I'd thought you'd call it art and free expression.

I get it, you're here to troll and make partisan political points. Now you're stuck because this particular one belies supposed progressive beliefs. Thus you have to resort to lawyering like you're in court. It's funny to watch.

OK, for your benefit, every time someone makes a rhetorical point demonstrating an instance of rank hypocrisy of the right, also consider inserted "not that I have a problem with this, but you are supposed to,"
at each instance where this thought occurs to you. It will save you thousands of posts.
 
Back
Top