Probably because it's irrelevant. If I were Chauvin, I would WANT it admitted though, because it proves that Chauvin knew he had the ability to fight and hurt people.
Derek Chauvin - Hero
- Thread starter artichoke
- Start date
Probably because it's irrelevant. If I were Chauvin, I would WANT it admitted though, because it proves that Chauvin knew he had the ability to fight and hurt people.
The sky is purple.
See, I can say random "make up whatever I feel like" bullshit too.
1) Ad nauseum fallacy (repeating my already debunked fallacy will make it true).
2) Ad vericundium fallacy (this important person saying something must make it true).
3) Non-sequiter fallacy (Chauvin violating policy in a way that the medical examiner's report proves isn't what killed Floyd somehow makes him guilty of murder).
Have you ever considered trying to use valid logic?
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
Chauvin was instrumental in popularizing "take the knee".
Ichabod Stain
Was it me?
1) Ad nauseum fallacy (repeating my already debunked fallacy will make it true).
2) Ad vericundium fallacy (this important person saying something must make it true).
3) Non-sequiter fallacy (Chauvin violating policy in a way that the medical examiner's report proves isn't what killed Floyd somehow makes him guilty of murder).
Have you ever considered trying to use valid logic?
valid logic is white supremacy.
Pinning down someone who tried to escape only makes someone an "asshole" in the eyes of those who have already decided they are going to see something that isn't there. The facts are undisputed. Pinning Floyd down isn't what killed him. You are trying to distract with inflammatory nonsense about knees on necks when you KNOW that's not what killed the thieving junkie.
That's YOU being an asshole, not the guy who provably did nothing wrong.
So now I'm an asshole?
I wasn't the one who killed someone who was already restrained and handcuffed lying on their stomach. I know better, and that asshole cop should have as well.
I mean, they do, sometimes, when society deems the persecution unjustifiable, as with Nelson Mandela. But our society has to relearn the lesson of the Salem witch trials and the book-burning Nazi lynch mobs by rabidly calling for the head of people who did nothing wrong, based on blind sheep herd nonsense, before any of the people Democrats are fraudulently destroying will ever be recognized as innocent.
Again, here is the video showing Floyd fleeing the cop car and resisting arrest.
https://tinyurl.com/4nvvsfvu
https://tinyurl.com/jkypttjb
By all means, show me how I'm "watching the video wrong."
Am I watching it without checking in with CNN to tell me what to think it means? Is that how I'm "watching it wrong?"
Actions have consequences. Tough shit, crybabies.
View attachment 19541
They sure do. Especially when you overstep your authority and act like an overly aggressive gestapo agent.
When your opponent has to resort to cheap grade school ad hominem nonsense like that, it is merely confirmation that you trounced them. I'll take that insult all day every day. It is the tool and the signature of the bitter, defeated loser.
You're being one, sure.
Erroneously smearing people who provably did nothing wrong is a serious asshole move.
Neither is Chauvin, according to the Medical Examiner.
And we're back to baseless smears.
And as soon as someone does that, this statement will be relevant.
And as soon as someone does that, this statement will be relevant.
That asshole cop did. That is an irrefutable fact.
Did...the thing that didn't kill Floyd, yes. Hence the problem with your spin here.
Did...the thing that didn't kill Floyd, yes. Hence the problem with your spin here.
What spin?
BidenPresident
Verified User
1) Ad nauseum fallacy (repeating my already debunked fallacy will make it true).
2) Ad vericundium fallacy (this important person saying something must make it true).
3) Non-sequiter fallacy (Chauvin violating policy in a way that the medical examiner's report proves isn't what killed Floyd somehow makes him guilty of murder).
Have you ever considered trying to use valid logic?
You are an idiot.
It doesn't matter whether or not you don't like riots. Most civilized human beings hate them. The point is that's , the way I see it there's a good change Chavin's verdict will trigger some super-sized race riots. The only possible eventuality that would prevent this rioting is Chauvin being convicted of 2nd - degree murder, any looking at how the Minnesota State Legal Code defines what 2nd-Degree murder amounts to, I don't think the prosecution could come anywhere close to prooving that Chauvin was guilty of this charge (beyond any reasonable doubt).
Chauvin is also charged with 3rd-degree murder and 2nd-degree manslaughter. If you've got the time, google up the current definitions of these two crimes in the official Minnesota Legal Code. If you can work what they mean, and how they could possibly relate to the Floyd case, I take my hat off to you, because I can't make head nor tail of them. There "all Greek to me"..."pure "Gobbledy - Gook" !
If there are riots after the verdict of Chauvin's case is pronounced, and YOU shot and killed a Black rioter trying to smash into a business you own, dude, IMO you would find yourself promptly arrested and charged with some category of homicide: Murder in the 1st -degree; 2nd - degree murder, 3rd - degree murder; 2nd -degree manslaughter, WHATEVER .And I wouldn't like your chances in Court, brother. I reckon you'd end up behind bars for sure.
Dachshund
Last edited:
So you approve of rioters?