Mob of Racist neo nazi Liberals attack Jewish diners at L.A. restaurant.

As you know, neither China, Cuba nor North Korea have a free press.

And those changes you describe are capitalist, not socialist, so they are not a rebuttal of the definition of socialisms. "Distribution" includes retail outlets. And "public ownership", in reality, means State ownership.

The State did wither away in Somalia.

They were not meant to be a rebuttal but to show what nations do in practice is not necessarily consistent with the economic philosophy they pretend to follow. It also shows any increased success of their economies is due to following more of a market economy with more private ownership. Distribution may mean retail outlets but many of those retail outlets are not state owned. For example, Alibaba is a private, for profit, company. Competition among different state owned enterprises creates a type of market economy. Locally owned businesses are pushed to make more profit.
 
Many multi nationals will sell out to the highest gov't bidder. :thup:

NBA, Google, and Disney are huge supporters of Socialist China, the worst polluter and one of the worst human rights violators. And the Democrats luv this. :palm:

many governments are completely corporately controlled too.
 
Total nonsense.
Palestinians are one group.
Neo Nazis are another group.
Liberals are another group still.
And brain-dead mutants who find Rush Limbaugh and Martin Luther King to be interchangeable are yet another group altogether.
[Especially if they also equate socialism and monarchy.]

The internet should be nothing but search engines and commercial websites.
JPP proves that every single day.

spoken like a true fascist. you're a sickening anti-human trainwreck.
 
They were not meant to be a rebuttal but to show what nations do in practice is not necessarily consistent with the economic philosophy they pretend to follow. It also shows any increased success of their economies is due to following more of a market economy with more private ownership. Distribution may mean retail outlets but many of those retail outlets are not state owned. For example, Alibaba is a private, for profit, company. Competition among different state owned enterprises creates a type of market economy. Locally owned businesses are pushed to make more profit.
you're truly fascist.

"locally owned businesses are pushed to make more profit." lol.

..... but mostly they die off quickly.
 
you're truly fascist.

"locally owned businesses are pushed to make more profit." lol.

..... but mostly they die off quickly.

I just described reality. These have nothing to do with my views. Calling me a fascist is a silly assumption completely unrelated to anything I posted.

Doing some reading about China's economy would help your knowledge. Many of China's state-owned businesses are owned by local provinces and they push those businesses for more revenue.
 
I just described reality. These have nothing to do with my views. Calling me a fascist is a silly assumption completely unrelated to anything I posted.

Doing some reading about China's economy would help your knowledge. Many of China's state-owned businesses are owned by local provinces and they push those businesses for more revenue.

fascism describes it well.
 
many governments are completely corporately controlled too.

This may be a matter of semantics, ... but do you have a list of examples?

China gives mega corps access to their markets, slave labor, and nearly non-existent environmental legislation. But the corps are not in charge.
 
They were not meant to be a rebuttal but to show what nations do in practice is not necessarily consistent with the economic philosophy they pretend to follow. It also shows any increased success of their economies is due to following more of a market economy with more private ownership. Distribution may mean retail outlets but many of those retail outlets are not state owned. For example, Alibaba is a private, for profit, company. Competition among different state owned enterprises creates a type of market economy. Locally owned businesses are pushed to make more profit.

Socialist capitalism comes in two forms.

1. Selling goods like oil to dirty foreigners for a Profit (pure evil). On a related note Germany has the largest trade surplus in the world.

2. P:rivate in name only (PINO). Jack Ma is more like a gov't bureaucrat, highly paid to be alibaba czar, and serve the State. But as soon as Jack made the mistake of criticizing China's banking system, criticizing the State, ... he got "disappeared" for 3 months.


All "news" from China is State propaganda, that only serves the State, and the State image.

Locally owned businesses are pushed to make more profit.

What is your reason and logic behind this statement?
 
This may be a matter of semantics, ... but do you have a list of examples?

China gives mega corps access to their markets, slave labor, and nearly non-existent environmental legislation. But the corps are not in charge.

it's fascism. this whole corporations good , government bad thing keeps you from seeing the fascist truth.

it's a monlithic power structure. powers are combined.
 
it's fascism. this whole corporations good , government bad thing keeps you from seeing the fascist truth.

it's a monlithic power structure. powers are combined.

Hitler would have killed any CEO that disobeyed him, ... that refused to serve the State. Jack Ma got "disappeared" for 3 months for criticizing the State.

You got that list of examples?
 
Caveat and disclaimer

Dear information consumer, this thread is a work of fiction. If you have mistakenly arrived here, know that nothing stated by the original poster of this thread or anyone agreeing with the author is based in fact or reason.
Any statement herein purporting to be fact that is true is entirely coincidental, and all conclusions and implications from purported statements of fact are false.
If you are seeking information about politics and current events you are strongly advise to leave, delete your cache and run antivirus.
 
Communism/Marxism would not have corporate CEOs because there would be no private corporations. All major industries would be state owned.

If we can't agree on definitions, we can't have an honest discussion, so I'll post these for reference ... from the original source.

" Marxist Stage Theory

Stage 1 – Primitive Communism

Men performed the same economic function – hunter gathering. They worked together in order to survive. There was no private property and there were no classes. Eventually the most successful hunter gatherers gained power and control over the others.

Stage 2 – Imperialism

The strong man ruled. He began by owning all the land but when threatened by outsiders, he would grant land to others in return for military services. A new land-owning aristocracy was therefore created.

Stage 3 – Feudalism

Land was owned by the aristocracy who exploited the peasantry who worked it. There was a surplus of food which the aristocracy sold to others – creating a class of merchants and capitalists who wanted to share political power.

Stage 4 – Capitalism

The wealthy merchants and factory owners (bourgeoisie) obtained political power and exploited the workers (proletariat). As the proletariat became politically aware they would rise up and overthrow the bourgeois government.

Stage 5 – Socialism

There would be a dictatorship of the proletariat as workers’ organisations re-distributed food, goods and services fairly according to need, and profits were shared by all. The middle classes would come to understand that equality was superior to private ownership.

Stage 6 – Communism

Everyone would join together for the common good. Money and government would no longer be needed and society would be class-less. As all countries reached this stage the world would become state-less and competition and wars would cease.
"


http://learneconomicsonline.com/marxist.php
 
Caveat and disclaimer

Dear information consumer, this thread is a work of fiction. If you have mistakenly arrived here, know that nothing stated by the original poster of this thread or anyone agreeing with the author is based in fact or reason.
Any statement herein purporting to be fact that is true is entirely coincidental, and all conclusions and implications from purported statements of fact are false.
If you are seeking information about politics and current events you are strongly advise to leave, delete your cache and run antivirus.

McSlobber is a drooling moron, devoid of sentient thought.
 
Back
Top