Into the Night
Contributor
Yeah, when you throw in places like Nigeria and the Sudan in comparisons, we are talking developed nations, in which our numbers are embarrassing
Cherry picking. Argument of the stone fallacy. Go look up the source.
Yeah, when you throw in places like Nigeria and the Sudan in comparisons, we are talking developed nations, in which our numbers are embarrassing
I don't believe owning a car is a right.
Nobody said they changed the Constitution, rather they interpret it, did you ever question why the Government can regulate say such as insurance when there is nothing remotely in the Commerce clause mentioning insurance
Not at all, fits exactly into the distorted view of “freedom” that gun advocates echo, if I have an inherent right to do anything I want, why is anything taken out of the picture
so you're in support of the government being able to tax the exercise of a right for revenue generation?
you don't have a clear understanding how that 'requirement' came in to effect, do you?
the states were blackmailed in to the insurance requirement by the withholding of federal highway funds if they did not......same for the nationwide speed limit at one time, as well as seat belt laws.
The 2nd amendment prohibits the government from infringing on the State's right of self defense (through the use of militias) and it prohibits the government from infringing on the individuals right to keep and bear arms (that means ANY weapon).
'Not infringed' means NO regulation or law may restrict weapons or from the States forming militias.
Ah, no, cause the overwhelming number of people operating a vehicle are licensed so of course the number will be higher, and horse drawn wagons could never hit speeds up to a 120+
so the people have no right to own property?
That form is kept by the dealer forever. Stupid lying fuck.
I don't see driving as a right.
this is a perfect example of how you don't understand freedom
I don't see driving as a right.
More bullshit, no one, no SCOTUS, no Constitutional scholar, or anyone has been able to offer a definitive explanation of the prefatory clause, your self accommodating understanding means zip outside of NRA propaganda
I didn't say that. Read what i wrote.
I don't believe owning a car is a right.
More bullshit, no one, no SCOTUS, no Constitutional scholar, or anyone has been able to offer a definitive explanation of the prefatory clause, your self accommodating understanding means zip outside of NRA propaganda
I didn't say that. Read what i wrote.
Lie. Murder is not an inherent right.
Extreme argument fallacy (hyperbole and fixation on sensationalist bullshit). Cherry picking fallacy. Compositional error fallacy (bigotry). Hoplophobia.
Why? How can any behavior be contained without restricting another’s “freedom? “
It is. Nothing can stop you from driving a car, a tractor, a truck, etc. on your own property.
Nothing can stop you from travel, legally, within the United States.