First victim of political prosecution of 1/6 receives sentence

What was he prepared for, though?

He was prepared for the coup to succeed, wasn't he?

What would have happened if he was successful?
boy scouts are prepared..doesnt mean a damn thing.
If he carried a weapon , then you have evidence he was intent on violence.. a first aid kit doesnt mean anything
 
the DEFENDANT was not violent

Sure he was...he was a part of that violent mob.

What would have happened if he was successful?


and NOT charged with a conspiracy

Not yet.


you have to sentence him ONLY on his crimes

So you admit he committed crimes. OK, that's progress.

What would have happened if his crime had been successful?


"Obstructing a proceeding"

For what purpose?
 
why? isnt that what he did according to the charge?
disrupted a proceding?

Did you see some cops letting them in?

I think that exactly was the charge. The post you answered was a response to Greenwald's quote that opens this thread.
 
dont do conjecture on criminal cases

LMAO!

Sure you do...you do it all the time.

You've done it for the last 9 months.

If his attack had been successful, elected representatives would have been killed.

He's lucky 18 months is what he's getting. If I was the judge, I'd give him and every other defendant the maximum sentence with no chance for parole.

And I'd make them admit under oath that Biden legitimately won the election.
 
Sure he was...he was a part of that violent mob.
he was not charged with a conspiracy, he can only then be charged on his actions - being at a riot isnt criminal-
there has to be criminal acts if not conspiracy
What would have happened if he was successful?
conjecture


it's a PLEA DEAL, they dont come back and charge again



So you admit he committed crimes. OK, that's progress.
disrupting proceedings -yes

What would have happened if his crime had been successful?
if pigs had wings


For what purpose?
to disrupt proceedings
 
boy scouts are prepared..doesnt mean a damn thing.
If he carried a weapon , then you have evidence he was intent on violence.. a first aid kit doesnt mean anything

Part of the evidence is what he brought with him to DC in his backpack. Inform yourself. The court will before they sentence him.
 
He sure did, and you were egging him on the whole time.




Nope. No video of this exists.

All anatta does on JPP is lie.
Sorry, but a cop letting them in doesn’t absolve them of a crime, it just implicates the cop. Dukkie should know this.
 
boy scouts are prepared..doesnt mean a damn thing.

Sure it does because it speaks to his intent and motive.

Otherwise, why did he accept Trump's invitation to DC?


If he carried a weapon

Maybe he did, he just ditched it.


then you have evidence he was intent on violence

Then what was the point of "stopping the steal"?


a first aid kit doesnt mean anything

By itself, probably not...but within the context of his actions, motivations, and intention, it sure as shit does.

It also says that he anticipated violence because that was his intent.
 
he was not charged with a conspiracy, he can only then be charged on his actions - being at a riot isnt criminal-
there has to be criminal acts if not conspiracy

He was charged for his actions which include a felony that has a 20 year maximum sentence.
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/capitol-breach-cases?combine=hodgkins

He was not charged with carrying a weapon, but the prosecutors used his actions before he arrived in DC to show his intent leading up to his actions.
 
Back
Top