Rittenhouse gets standing ovation at conservative conference

Maybe he can get one of those bachelors "plus" degrees

VsyumLHhXjpH5c77QQc22X-320-80.jpg
 
Wow, you really ARE demented, aren't you, Karen? Now toddle off and pump up your vinyl "girlfriend." :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:

I guess when you've already sold your soul, all you can do is laugh when people recognize you for the elderly slag you are.

But my question stands. How well do you think you know your old folks home attendants?
 
You mean the suspect that resisted arrest fought the police a had a knife? I'm not surprised he got shot. But what does that have to do with Rittenhouse trying to defend a car dealership from being set on fire and then shooting white people who attacked him?

I guess you missed the whole part where the car dealership ppl did not invite the vigilantes, nor want them there. Funny how you Reichwingers always disregard what doesn't fit into your narrative.
 
Yep. Like this.

wknRl9Q.jpg


Civil trials have a lower standard of evidence, as well.

Rittenhouse's acquittal was not the slam dunk that the Reichwingers believe. The jury deliberated over a period of days, and sent for further information several times.
And after they reviewed all the evidence they voted not guilty.
 
Yep. Like this.

wknRl9Q.jpg


Civil trials have a lower standard of evidence, as well.

Rittenhouse's acquittal was not the slam dunk that the Reichwingers believe. The jury deliberated over a period of days, and sent for further information several times.

Pictute prooves what? Anyone can go get their picture taken in a bar any time they want.

Again, all you have are prejudiced conspiracy theories and you're the exact slime who decrys conspiracy theories.
 
I guess you missed the whole part where the car dealership ppl did not invite the vigilantes, nor want them there. Funny how you Reichwingers always disregard what doesn't fit into your narrative.
I guess you missed the part where the car dealership accepted his help in defending the business. Funny how you leftwingers are so poorly informed.
 
That would be double jeopardy, which is unconstitutional (of course you libturds don't believe in our constitution).

How ironic that you accuse someone of not knowing the constitution when YOU don't. It is not double jeopardy to file a wrongful death lawsuit in a murder case, even if the defendant was acquitted. OJ's victim's families did so, and won. Double jeopardy only pertains to criminal cases, which are brought by the govt.
 
And after they reviewed all the evidence they voted not guilty.

They did not review those photographs of Rittenhouse paling it up with the proud boys; the judge would not allow it into evidence -- despite the fact that the same judge had to ORDER Rittenhouse to stay out of bars, not drink alcohol, and to not associate with white supremacists.

Here's where you jump up and down again and screech about "bringing race into it." :laugh:
 
I guess he should have just stayed home and did his homework like normal 17-yo kids do.
Actually he says he should have just stayed home and played video games. He was just a naïve 17 year old kid that thought he could help save his community after the authorities refused to do their jobs and protect the community.
 
Yep. Like this.

wknRl9Q.jpg


Civil trials have a lower standard of evidence, as well.

Rittenhouse's acquittal was not the slam dunk that the Reichwingers believe. The jury deliberated over a period of days, and sent for further information several times.

Of course they deliberated over days. They wanted to make sure they knew all the particulars of the case, the outline of the charges and what constituted self defense or murder. They came to the proper conclusion in this case.
 
How ironic that you accuse someone of not knowing the constitution when YOU don't. It is not double jeopardy to file a wrongful death lawsuit in a murder case, even if the defendant was acquitted. OJ's victim's families did so, and won. Double jeopardy only pertains to criminal cases, which are brought by the govt.

You fucking idiot! Read what I responded to :palm:

And that stupid troll APL didn't read it either.
 
They did not review those photographs of Rittenhouse paling it up with the proud boys; the judge would not allow it into evidence -- despite the fact that the same judge had to ORDER Rittenhouse to stay out of bars, not drink alcohol, and to not associate with white supremacists.

Here's where you jump up and down again and screech about "bringing race into it." :laugh:

Do you think that people in a bar that took pictures with Rittenhouse presented their Pour Boys membership card to Rittenhouse? :rofl2:The judge orders... Link?
 
Do you think that people in a bar that took pictures with Rittenhouse presented their Pour Boys membership card to Rittenhouse? :rofl2:The judge orders... Link?

Kyle Rittenhouse prohibited from association with supremacists under modified bail conditions

Judge: Prosecutors can’t show Rittenhouse link to Proud Boys

Judge: Rittenhouse can’t associate with white supremacists while on bail


Here's the part where you thump your chest and screech "liberal bias! libtard media!" :laugh:
 
Poor dumb Incel tard. :laugh:

Today, 11:48 AM
Blackcat13th
Verified Loser

This message is hidden because Blackcat13th is on your ignore list.
 
Back
Top