How is that laughable? What is laughable is your contention that Government infers rights. That's mind numbing in its ignorance and stupidity.
Finally, intelligent gun regulations
- Thread starter archives
- Start date
How is that laughable? What is laughable is your contention that Government infers rights. That's mind numbing in its ignorance and stupidity.
I would say yes, but no measures stop all deaths, just like armed citizens can’t stop all crimes.
Do you believe a poll tax restricts people from voting?
If so, then why are you asserting that criminalizing those who don't pay liability insurance should have their rights taken away from them? Do you understand that the wealthy can pay those fees but the poor cannot?
It's bad enough to be caught DWB in California, but now there's the extra charge of, "Well, sir, it appears your gun insurance has lapsed. I'll have to take you in".
Or you morons who voted for Trump not once but TWICE! LOL
No, it’s just being realistic, you can run around thinking your rights come from the Creator, until a group of armed persons show up at your door and take you away.How is that laughable? What is laughable is your contention that Government infers rights. That's mind numbing in its ignorance and stupidity.
Maybe Democrats will realize their mistakes when the red tsunami hits them in November? Nah, Democrats are too fucking stupid to see anything past their upturned noses.
Armed citizens don't need to stop ALL crime. We just need AGs and politicians who want to keep criminals behind bars. Dunce.
That's why we have a second amendment. Do you actually believe that police stop a crime from happening?
Just another reason why only the rich have swimming pools and the poor ride buses. LOL
Your choice, dipshit.
I think you’re the naive one if you don’t think governments control your rights.You're not being realistic. You're being idealistic and naive.
I’m not rich, we just saved and budgeted to have our lifestyle.Just another reason why only the rich have swimming pools and the poor ride buses. LOL
At times they do, do you actually believe people who own guns stop all crime?That's why we have a second amendment. Do you actually believe that police stop a crime from happening?
So, you do need the government, lolArmed citizens don't need to stop ALL crime. We just need AGs and politicians who want to keep criminals behind bars. Dunce.
The irony is deep with uneducated fools like you. Again, this statement is a testimony to how badly our educational establishment has failed you.
I imagine that "negligent" would be something like that idiot mother who bought gun(s) for the Sandy Hook shooter. And was killed by her own son with one of them. "Negligent" would also be not keeping it locked up, a kid gets hold of it and shoots another child. Or they aren't locked up and are stolen, and are used in a crime -- like a mass shooting.