Congratulations, you took freedom away…

It isn't HER who is being killed... it is HER OFFSPRING that is being killed (for sake of convenience).

The mother is not the offspring, dude. You seem to be failing at basic identity.

Sybil is Koo-Koo for Coco-Puffs. You're a not doctor, dumbass. You can't speak for every women seeking an abortion, you fucking psycho.
 
Sybil is Koo-Koo for Coco-Puffs.
I don't care what Sybil is... she only exists inside of your own mind.

You're a not doctor, dumbass.
You don't know what I am (as is the nature of an online forum), so stop speaking for me, you fucking psycho.

You are also making unnecessary requirements.

You can't speak for every women seeking an abortion, you fucking psycho.
I'm not speaking for anyone other than myself, you fucking psycho.
 
I don't care what Sybil is... she only exists inside of your own mind.

You don't know what I am (as is the nature of an online forum), so stop speaking for me, you fucking psycho.

You are also making unnecessary requirements.

I'm not speaking for anyone other than myself, you fucking psycho.
Bullshit.
 
Says the psycho who regularly posts abusive content towards some non-existent girl named Sybil.

Girl? WTF kind of gaslighting bullshit is that, Sybil?

6lv2jd.jpg
 
It isn't HER who is being killed... it is HER OFFSPRING that is being killed (for sake of convenience).

The mother is not the offspring, dude. You seem to be failing at basic identity.

The state has no business interfering in people's private lives and bodily autonomy. You must be a fascist. What next, banning birth control?
 
So you reluctantly admit there have been cases where murder was charged for killing an unborn baby. That in and of itself destroys the main argument of late term abortion advocates.

I believe Scott Peterson was charged with two murders, one of his wife and one of his close to full-term baby, meaning it could have lived outside the womb.
 
No, it is simply her offspring (her child). This is true regardless of whatever particular stage of human development her offspring happens to be in at any given moment (whether that be a zygote, embryo, fetus, newborn, adolescent, teenager, or whatever else).
by that reasoning an acorn is "simply" an oak tree.. there are medical/biological terms for a reason.
use them
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Your first sentence is either a product of a lie or sheer ignorance. Time and again I ask you Christo-fascist flunkies to explain how Roe vs. Wade forced anyone to have an abortion? To date, you intellectually dishonest cowards can't/won't answer that question....you just keep squawking the propaganda. But as the SCOTUS decision shows, reason and logic are not necessary for a Christo-fascist agenda.


Your Straw man question is the only intellectual dishonesty here.

translation: a major bag of hot air by the mindsets like Sawyer here has just been deflated, and junior has no logical/factual retort, rebuttal or explanation. So he just blows smoke at usual with an out-of-context quote attempt. Pity the little stupe doesn't realize that all one has to do is clik the little arrows next to the screen names to follow the chronology of the posts, which exposes Sawyers Christo-fascist tainted intellectual dishonesty. Also, I've properly highlighted the complete sentence(s) for the rational, objective reader to see how Sawyer acts EXACTLY as I said he would.

Time for you to stop making a fool of yourself and log off, Sawyer. ;)
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Unn-huh...and to date, there are a miniscule amount of case in the 50 states where a pregnant woman was murdered and the jury/judge decreed that the plaintive be charged with a double homicide. There has been NO case were a perpetrator assaulted a woman and caused a miscarriage, and then was charged with murder. If you can find such, let me know.

And again, where is the death certificate for the "murdered baby"? Name, birth date, etc. You see, when dealing with the legal specifics, you can't get away with generics and supposition ... at least not until some of the right wing decisions of the SCOTUS as of late.


So you reluctantly admit there have been cases where murder was charged for killing an unborn baby. That in and of itself destroys the main argument of late term abortion advocates.

Not quite.....I was incorrect in stating that there were a miniscule number, as of 4 years ago it was 38 States.. https://www.ncsl.org/research/health/fetal-homicide-state-laws.aspx

BUT


As always, the devil is in the details. Case in point, in Oklahoma defines unborn child as a human being. Homicide does not include legal abortion or instances of death during normal medical, therapeutic or diagnostic testing. A mother shall not be prosecuted for the death of an unborn child unless the death was a result of criminal behavior.


So now all YOU have to do is link the cases where the coroner listed the pregnancy as an individual "person"....much less with a name. Yeah, it does matter, because each state has it's nuances that don't work out exactly as you think, much less in general terms.
 
Back
Top