Tucker's coverage is not "transparency"

Carlson is an admitted liar & a complete fraud.

Why are we having this conversation? Anyone who believes a word that guy says hasn't paid attention, or is extremely gullible. He relies on both to maintain viewership, but he's not a serious person, or commentator.
 
What Tucker Carlson said about Trump in private texts vs. on Fox News

Tucker Carlson is the most-watched cable news host in the country. He is a primary source of pro-Trump political punditry and has advanced the false notion that the Jan. 6, 2021, attempt to violently overtake the Capitol was a peaceful protest.

But Carlson’s on-air rhetoric was in dramatic opposition to private sentiments he shared with colleagues, in which he professed to “passionately” hate Trump and yearn for the end of his presidency. Those private communications, which were released as part of Dominion Voting Systems’ $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against Fox News, show how Carlson struggled to publicly support the president’s false voter-fraud theories that he privately scoffed at.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2023/03/09/tucker-carlson-trump-texts-fox-news/


Amazing anyone takes Tucker Carlson seriously.
 
BartenderElite said:
COMPLETELY inappropriate repetitive references to the Reichstag fire, btw. That was Trump's thing. I started a thread on that during his admin.
Click to expand...


The thread is about the Reichstag Fire. About the fraud perpetrated on America by the democrat Reich, who have taken a riot that was far less violent than 99% of those that the Brown Shirts of the democrats engaged in during the Kristallnacht of 2019-20 and have lied that it was some sort of "insurrection" in order to demonize those who protest against the Reich. And now we have proof that the Nazi democrats have been lying the entire time.
 
BartenderElite said:
"Transparency" is opening up all 44,000 hours of footage to the public. The mere idea that Tucker showing his cherrypicked version of events - which amounts to less than 2 hours out of that 44,000 total - qualifies as any kind of "transparency" is actually the height of comedy.

From the start, he focused on footage that showed the more calm elements from that day, and has portrayed the rioters as "sightseers." He has a clear agenda on this, and that is to downplay the idea that this was an insurrection and a threat to the peaceful transfer of power.

It's kind of like having footage of someone committing armed robbery, but showing footage of them grabbing a coffee prior to the robbery, and saying 'See? This wasn't nearly as bad as everyone said..."
Click to expand...

That is more than democrats cobbled together to start hearings, arresting people etc, etc. Stop being a hypocrite. I can understand the 3 that "thanked" your for this drivel. They are just dumber than fuck. You? Not so much.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
The thread is about the Reichstag Fire. About the fraud perpetrated on America by the democrat Reich, who have taken a riot that was far less violent than 99% of those that the Brown Shirts of the democrats engaged in during the Kristallnacht of 2019-20 and have lied that it was some sort of "insurrection" in order to demonize those who protest against the Reich. And now we have proof that the Nazi democrats have been lying the entire time.
Click to expand...

Wow, you sound like you never read a single thing about history.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
That simply isn't true.

Speaker McCarthy has opened the video files for viewing to all members of congress - which I cited with the putrid scum Thompson admitting that he never saw them - that the Nazi show trial was based on rumor and innuendo.

7dw7px.jpg


What democrats fear is the truth getting out. For two years the thugs of the J6 farce have LIED to the nation and used fabricated video to push a narrative for the purpose of crushing the 1st amendment right of protest - seeking to end any and all dissent against the tyranny of the fascist democrat party.
Click to expand...

What's your excuse for all the 1/6 traitors who pleaded guilty to their charges?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top