IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Gaetz is not a pedophile, and would make absolutely the best AG. You're still living on the playground, name-calling.
The would be AG was a child sex predator
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Cypress still has yet to make an honest post. Contributing in a value-added way to a conversation just isn't what he sign up for.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
That's Wikipedia you are citing, a non-authoritative source. Dismissed.
Genetic fallacy - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Well, he's a sex pest. What would you expect?
Committing another logical fallacy doesn't make you right.
It compounds your error.
Genetic Fallacy (28 Examples + Definition)
Ever found yourself confused during a debate or discussion because someone made an argument that seemed off, but you couldn't put your finger on why?
practicalpie.com
Daylight63
Verified User
Shouldn't you be over on the Penny thread clamoring for negative attention and barf emojis, TwinkleTwat?
TwinkleTwat? I'm keeping that one. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Daylight63
Verified User
Commuting a death sentence still means they stay in prison. They just don't get killed by a lethal injection. They still die in prison if that helps.
Unlike Matt Gaetz who was about to become Attorney General.
I don't know if you can think very hard about this but the two are NOT the same. Just not.
If you are OK with and WANT a sex predator like Matt Gaetz as attorney general you will have to wait until Trump pardons Ghislane M. and gives her a cabinet post.
They wanted him, until trump moved on.
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
You are mistaken. Any appeal to authority must be to an authoritative source, otherwise the appeal is summarily dismissed.
I disagree.
Appeal to Authority - Examples and Definition
Appeal to Autority is the simplest logical fallacy - just referencing expert's opinion. False Authority, Questionable Authority, Celebrity examples.
www.logical-fallacy.com
We can keep this up all day.
I'll cite a source, and you'll dismiss it?
You sure believe a lot of things that aren't true. Maybe you should start researching facts and stop just believing.
I did? I'd like to see some quotes of that. Start them back 4 years ago then work forward so I can review each one. Provide context as well. Thanks in advance......
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
Gaetz should have become the AG. There was no reason for his nomination to be questioned.
He's not a sex predator. Why do you claim that he is, besides your eternal dishonesty?
IBDaMann
Probably the worse human in the threads
I see that, but you are mistaken.
I'll explain. One can appeal to an agreed-upon authoritative source. That's not a problem. If the appeal is to a non-authoritative source, then it becomes an "appeal to authority" fallacy.
You appealed to Wikipedia. I summarily dismiss Wikipedia; it is a non-authoritative source.
Nope. It should end here with the above explanation.
Correct. You can cite any authority that I recognize and I'll recognize it. Otherwise, your "appeal to authority" fallacy is discarded.
ExpressLane
Verified User
The FBI and the DOJ wasn't interested . Gaetz holds no public office. Explain to me why this is news.
So I shouldn't bother reading the 37 page report that you linked for me, because you'll believe that my conclusions are just regurgitated LW media stuff? How disappointing. I thought better of you, kiddo. I won't bother giving them then, since I'd hate to fuck up your predictions -- and your classic projection -- here.
PS -- I looked at Fox on line for their take. Interesting how light on details and heavy on excuses they are. Maybe you all should try better shources -- like the document you linked for me.
It's what Reichwingers do. There apparently is no depraved or sexual or violent or financial or stolen classified documents crime so heinous that they can't find a way to minimize and/or excuse it -- as long as the accused is one of theirs, of course.