Gotta love those ballot dumps if you are a marxist

Crepitus said:
NOpe. None of them have republican parties trying to fuck shit up. It's a fact.
Click to expand...

California certainly does have a Republican Party, and four of the countries listed (Brazil, France, India, and Germany) currently possess legally registered political parties that explicitly use "Republican" or "The Republicans" in their native names.

1. Brazil
  • Official Party Name: Republicanos (Republicans). [
  • Primary Source Verification: Registered under the TSE (Superior Electoral Court) as Party Code 10. Founded originally in 2005 as the Partido Republicano Brasileiro (PRB) before rebranding simply to Republicanos in 2019.
  • Raw Empirical Data: It is a highly active, influential national conservative party. It currently commands 42 seats in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies going into the 2026 general election cycle.
2. France
  • Official Party Name: Les Républicains (The Republicans - LR).
  • Primary Source Verification: Registered under French constitutional law governing political associations. Established on May 30, 2015, as the direct legal renaming and structural overhaul of the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP) under Jacques Chirac and Nicolas Sarkozy.
  • Raw Empirical Data: Operating as a major center-right, Gaullist political force, the party is currently led by Bruno Retailleau.

3. India
  • Official Party Name: Republican Party of India (RPI).
  • Primary Source Verification: Registered with the Election Commission of India (ECI) under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. It traces its primary foundational roots back to an October 1, 1957 charter dictated by the anti-caste leader and architect of the Indian Constitution, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar.
  • Raw Empirical Data: Today, the party is registered with the ECI (e.g., Republican Party of India (Athawale), Republican Party of India (Sivaraj).
4. Germany
  • Official Party Name: Die Republikaner (The Republicans - REP).
  • Primary Source Verification: Registered under the German Political Parties Act (Parteiengesetz). Founded in 1983 by former members of the Christian Social Union (CSU).
  • Raw Empirical Data: They achieved regional parliament representation in the late 1980s and 1990s (such as in Baden-Württemberg)
 
Crepitus said:
Nope. Pointing out the realities.
Click to expand...

Argument from repetition: Occurs when repetition is treated as if it adds evidence.

Aliases: Argumentum ad nauseam.​

A claim does not become better supported because it is repeated.
 
List of countries that typically have same day election results while California takes a month to count * (via Grok):

• Australia
• Austria
• Belgium
• Bhutan
• Botswana
• Bulgaria
• Canada
• Chad
• Croatia
• Cyprus
• Czech Republic
• Denmark
• Egypt
• Estonia
• Ethiopia
• Finland
• France
• Germany
• Ghana
• Greece
• Hungary
• Iceland
• India
• Indonesia
• Ireland
• Israel
• Italy
• Ivory Coast / Côte d’Ivoire
• Japan
• Jordan
• Kenya
• Kuwait
• Latvia
• Lebanon
• Lithuania
• Luxembourg
• Malaysia
• Malta
• Mauritius
• Namibia
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Nigeria
• Norway
• Philippines
• Poland
• Portugal
• Romania
• Senegal
• Seychelles
• Singapore
• Slovakia
• Slovenia
• South Africa
• South Korea
• Spain
• Sweden
• Switzerland
• Taiwan
• Thailand
• Tunisia
• United Arab Emirates (UAE)
• United Kingdom

* Countries like India (with nearly a billion voters) and Indonesia release highly accurate, definitive sample counts or electronic tallies within hours, but the complete physical verification of all polling stations can stretch over a few days. In Switzerland, while local results are known immediately on election Sunday, final tight races can sometimes wait a brief period for external postal ballots to clear.

Many countries on the list—most notably France, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom—rely entirely on paper ballots counted by hand immediately after polls close. Because they lack mail-in voting extensions and thus do not need complex signature matching, they can successfully deliver nationwide results within a few hours on election night.
 
Teflon Don said:

Amazing how these ballot dumps after election day ALWAYS favors the marxists running as a democrat

Anyone shocked? I am not

I think it is a foregone conclusion that when Commiefornistan FINALLY finishes counting, it will be Becerra and Steyer.

I mean it is easy to cheat once you know how many you need right? No time constraints?

I mean it would be racist to expect people to vote in a specified time frame

Commiefornistan has become a national joke on many fronts. Third world countries have better voting processes than Commiefornistan
Click to expand...
Hey, thank goodness! You're the guy I wanna speak with! I still have several thousand trump ballots I stole from Georgia in 2020. Ok if I stash them in your mom's basement next to where y'all store the dead hookers?
 
Cypress said:
Give me a highly reputable, nonpartisan link proving this litany of claims

Mail in voting always favors Democrats, and
late vote counts are almost always from core urban areas, for the reason I describe.

If you are frustrated that more Republicans aren't voting by mail, look no further than your bloated Messiah.
Click to expand...
Beautiful response. @T. A. Gardner and other MAGA-sniffers know that if more people have the opportunity to vote, Republicans lose because their ideas suck. TA's hoping Republicans attempts to gerrymander and suppress the vote will work well enough for his broken party to eek out a win.
 
HKPmie6agAARsPT
 
LurchAddams said:
Beautiful response. @T. A. Gardner and other MAGA-sniffers know that if more people have the opportunity to vote, Republicans lose because their ideas suck. TA's hoping Republicans attempts to gerrymander and suppress the vote will work well enough for his broken party to eek out a win.
Click to expand...
Beautiful? More like trivial objections fallacy. It is simply a dodge. No proof would be good enough for Cypress.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Beautiful? More like trivial objections fallacy. It is simply a dodge. No proof would be good enough for Cypress.
Click to expand...

Have you presented any proof whatsoever?

Did you see Trump's recent interview? The only reason anyone believe there is "massive fraud" (a decade going now, and still no hard evidence for anything like that), is because a deranged pathological liar who hates losing said so.
 
BartenderElite said:
Have you presented any proof whatsoever?

Did you see Trump's recent interview? The only reason anyone believe there is "massive fraud" (a decade going now, and still no hard evidence for anything like that), is because a deranged pathological liar who hates losing said so.
Click to expand...


When statistically impossible things happen, we should not be expected as a society to accept them. Evidence of fraud isn’t limited to video surveillance. Statistical impossibilities are hard evidence of fraud.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top