Happy Pride Month
- Thread starter countryboy
- Start date
MAGAts have been dressing up their dogs way back then.
Hey stupid, do you know what the word "OR" means?
I said on tv shows OR cartoons, and above i showed you examples of heterosexual kissing on TV shows AND cartoons.
In your stupidity you laugh at that, demonstrating how hopelessly stupid you are.
No we cannot as i am not stupid so i would not agree with you on something so inaccurate.
Kim Possible
Zoey 101
Boy Meets World
Jimmy Neutron
Aladdin
Sleeping Beauty
Hunch Back of Notre Dame
Tangled
Princess and the Frog
Hercules
Is this enough now for you to acknowledge your stupidity @Uncensored2008 or do you need dozens more examples?
Well, Kim Possible is from 2002 - so this century. I guess you found one.
None of the rest are.
Have you ever been exposed to the words "mitosis" and "meiosis"?
The ability of any organism to reproduce is the very definition of life. From single cell amoeba to the great apes, the existence of life depends on the organism having the ability to replicate.
That is biological reality.
In complex organisms such as mammals, reproduction involves a sperm cell and and egg cell. Sperm cells come exclusively from males, those with a "Y" chromosome. Egg cells come exclusively from females, those with "XX" chromosomes.
This is biological reality.
Your political agenda doesn't alter reality.
Overpopulation kills. The control mechanism is biological reality.
QP!
Verified User
Hey stupid i provided the prior example mostly from my child hood and the time when i raised my kids and was NOT exposed to newer media.
So it seems you concede during those decades kids WERE IN FACT exposed to a ton of heterosexual kissing, etc. So i win on that point.
My last search is for more current media and cartoons and i made sure my google search, which i do not see much of with grown children, focused on 'popular' and the list was IMMENSE. I could post dozens more examples of kids movies and cartoons ALL OF WHICH have heterosexual couples, parents, etc kissing and more.
You are simply wrong and stupid in saying this does not exist and never happens when it is VERY COMMON.
Last edited:
It does?
Cite?
Starvation from lack of food supply? I agree.
But what does that have to do with the promotion of homosexuality to children and democrats are engaged in?
QP!
Verified User
WRONG.
You are defining how 'life beginnings' not what results from that life once it begins or what you call "existing in nature".
You are saying
- 'only those who have the ability to create life and make the choice to do so "exist in nature"
if you cannot see how the latter DOES NOT follow from the former that is because you are hopelessly stupid.
A sterile person being born of those able to replicate DOES EXIST, even though they cannot participate in the process, in the same way, to then replicate themselves.
"Existing in nature", is NOT, limited to those who can procreate, and as you say those who cannot, or do not, DO NOT EXIST, in nature. It is clear they do. Some people CANNOT replicate (due to health issues) and others CHOSE not to and they DO EXIST, no matter as a NORMAL niche segment in nature. Nature is FULL of niche populations and deviations from the norm as part of the NORMAL and NATURAL divergence in nature which never seeks a 100% homogenous population, in any area.
Environmental & Societal Effects
- Biodiversity Loss: Human expansion and land conversion destroy natural habitats, leading to the rapid extinction of numerous wild species. [1]
- Resource Depletion: High demand taxes essential resources like fresh water, arable land, and fossil fuels beyond their regenerative capacity. [1, 2]
- Climate Change: More individuals, combined with carbon-heavy industrial and agricultural processes, accelerate global warming. [1, 2, 3, 4]
- Economic Strain: Rapid population growth in developing regions can strain infrastructure, overwhelm job markets, and exacerbate poverty. [1, 2]
It has to do with biological reality.
Attachments
And yet the parameters were "this century" as the discussion is the grooming efforts of the democrat party. Hard core grooming became national around January 6, 2009.
How do you "win?" The move against common culture began this century - as I have said all along.
The left wants to recast society to eradicate the nuclear family. Family has always been an impediment to unquestioning loyalty to the state. Grooming young children to reject the concept of family is critical to the dismantling of society.
Yet you still could find content only from the 20th century with one exception of a show made 24 years ago, that specifically was aimed at teens and adults.
I'm saying that the Hollywood left is engaged in a massive grooming of children. Parents have taken note and for the first time in history, Hollywood faces serious competition
QP!
Verified User
and yet that is just a lie. You are a shameless liar who cannot cite our post exchange that started this discussion where you said 'recent' (this century') media, so i just posted to you from my childhood and that of my kids, as i personally watched those shows and KNOW you are wrong in saying 'kids were not exposed to heterosexual kissing'.
Kids from childhood to preteen have ALWAYS been exposed to that from shows like Family Ties and The Cosby's etc and Raymond with the parents regular kissing, and that also happened on cartoons.
Beyond that i then posted all sorts of CURRENT cartoons and kids based shows for young children to pre teens where they STILL are kissing and more on shows. If Hollywood is doing it they are doing it MOSTLY by showing heterosexual kissing, etc as that is shown way more than anything else.
So i win by exposing you are clueless and lying in this claim that there is no heterosexual grooming (kissing, etc) being directed at young kids thru pre teen.
ROFL
You said overpopulation kills.
I accept that you can't point to even a single human death due to "overpopulation. "
Anthropogenic global warming, which your cult has attempted to rebrand "climate change" is an exposed myth. It's not 1990 anymore. New York isn't underwater and there is still snow in England.
The "overpopulation" idiocy of the 1960's is also long debunked. Every person earth could comfortably live in Texas with 12,000 square feet of ground each.
Yakuda
Verified User
Hey idiot didnt you notice the dog in that video isnt dressed up the fucked up owner is dressed like a dog. So you just post shit no matter how stupid just so you can see your name in the thread. That about sums it up doesnt it?
Take a look at this, fucking idiot.
Besides the video you were talking about says "transing dogs".
QP!
Verified User
No that is a lie. i found dozens upon dozens. All those movies posted above are 'this century' or current and i deliberately have spanned the period from my childhood to current to show it has ALWAYS occurred and is not time period dependent.
You are simply lying. If you wish i can post an endless string of cartoons or shows, most of which i have never watched, not having young kids currently, but google says they are current and popular and have featured heterosexual couples kissing and they provide screenshots.
You are a proven liar, who cannot stop lying. See above moves and shows as proof
He looks and acts gay. LOL.