Now that they rigged Pratt out who wins?

@Damocles You write,

"so that they can count the votes from that day, know how many they need, and just "find" more ballots in cars, etc. until they meet that "need". They'll keep doing this until they cross a barrier that the unaffiliated voter cries foul on... When it becomes too obvious there will be objections, they'll be caught.... the problem is they do this everywhere, they get in power, make sure that "mail in ballots" happen, then push that same narrative so that they can just "count until they win"..."

I am asking if you have evidence for that destructive lie?
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
Jarod said:
@Damocles You write,

"so that they can count the votes from that day, know how many they need, and just "find" more ballots in cars, etc. until they meet that "need". They'll keep doing this until they cross a barrier that the unaffiliated voter cries foul on... When it becomes too obvious there will be objections, they'll be caught.... the problem is they do this everywhere, they get in power, make sure that "mail in ballots" happen, then push that same narrative so that they can just "count until they win"..."

I am asking if you have evidence for that destructive lie?
Click to expand...
And I noted that the history will show you where I come up with that pattern, as well as the "lie" nonsense that the Democrats constantly portray. It doesn't take much to predict that some idiot will say that it is a "lie" but it also doesn't take much to simply look at the pattern.
 
ZenMode said:
That is what the evidence, specifically total votes, shows.
Click to expand...
There is evidence of rigging. Both circumstantial and direct. In this so called election and in others.

The evidence not "the totals", it is the fact that batches of were dropped with only one candidates name. It is that signatures on mail in ballot envelopes are smiley faces. It is that people have voted on behalf of their dog. It is that corrupt officials fight tooth and nail to impede all attempts at real audits (recounts of scrambled ballots are not meaningful audits).

It is that people have admitted to taking money to give a ballot to harvesters.

It is that seniors who are clearly not of the cognizance to be politically active citizens are used as puppets, this I observed personally when I served as an election judge to top the mountain of evidence available (just on that subject) to those who are honest enough to look for it.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
There is evidence of rigging. Both circumstantial and direct. In this so called election and in others.

The evidence not "the totals", it is the fact that batches of were dropped with only one candidates name. It is that signatures on mail in ballot envelopes are smiley faces. It is that people have voted on behalf of their dog. It is that corrupt officials fight tooth and nail to impede all attempts at real audits (recounts of scrambled ballots are not meaningful audits).

It is that people have admitted to taking money to give a ballot to harvesters.

It is that seniors who are clearly not of the cognizance to be politically active citizens are used as puppets, this I observed personally when I served as an election judge to top the mountain of evidence available (just on that subject) to those who are honest enough to look for it.
Click to expand...
There's always Trumpian evidence of voter fraud.
 
Libhater said:
I'm almost hoping that Steve Hilton loses the governorship race come November so that the rigged Communist run state of blue kalifornicator remains the same Hammer & Sickle rat hole that sinks into the Pacific ocean at the behest of their commie leadership. Either that or the other option would be for Kalifornicator to secede from the union and perhaps take up partnership with Mexico.
Click to expand...
You poor pathetic delusional lost soul.
 
Teflon Don said:
So which marxist will be cheated into office?

Raman noodle couldn’t even win her council district

She even conceded on election night and we are supposed to believe she won fair and square.

As I said, everything that happened went according to Commiefornistan law. The rigging is baked into the law
Click to expand...
The only thing that is rigged is your mind.
 
Noking said:
There are a lot of people ranting and raving about socialism, and they don't know what the word means.
Click to expand...
Ok? Raman identifies as a Democratic socialist. So does Mamdani. So does Bernie Sanders.

Democratic socialists are rarely confused with Republicans. So if the claim is a Republican isn't going to win the Mayor's race when the two candidates are Bass and Raman, you can take that to the bank. (And although Caruso ran as a Democrat, Bass can't call Raman a Republican like she did Caruso)
 
ZenMode said:
Nobody rigged anything. LA County is only 18% registered Republican. Nobody should be surprised, including the conspiracy theorist, that too dems won.
Click to expand...
Jarod said:
You are such a patsy. You know that Trump and his crew are laughing at your type, Right?

You are a very weak minded, cultist, who is being manipulated and taking advantage of.

@Teflon Don
Click to expand...

He is proving what i have said when dupes like @Damocles think the issue is 'election reform' and question why dems will not just 'go along with the changes magats want to help build confidence in the elections'.

As i have said prior, and say again, the PROCESS of the elections and how they are executed are IRRELEVANT to magat confidence issues. If you did every single thing the magats demand now and Dems were still winning, they would still have no confidence and demand more and more changes and only once Dems could not win anywhere, then and only then, would they have confidence.

Nothing proves my assertion more then the fact no magat will believe Pratt could lose in California, without it being cheating. Imagine what dem's would have to concede to with magats to ensure Pratt and all like him win 100% of the time in California so they can gain 'confidence in elections'.
 
ADreamOfLiberty said:
There is evidence of rigging. Both circumstantial and direct. In this so called election and in others.

The evidence not "the totals", it is the fact that batches of were dropped with only one candidates name.
Click to expand...
That was debunked by Trump's Justice Department.

1000026685.png
ADreamOfLiberty said:
It is that signatures on mail in ballot envelopes are smiley faces.
Click to expand...
Never heard of this. Link?
ADreamOfLiberty said:
It is that people have voted on behalf of their dog.
Click to expand...
One woman did that a few years ago. Also a few years ago, 4 Republicans in Florida voted twice. Are Florida's elections now rigged?
ADreamOfLiberty said:
It is that corrupt officials fight tooth and nail to impede all attempts at real audits (recounts of scrambled ballots are not meaningful audits).
Click to expand...
Not sure what this is referring to either, but Republicans in AZ (which was apart of Trump's 2020 stolen election lie) paid millions for a full forensic audit....which ended up finding 35 "questionable" ballots. Not fraudulent. Not Chinese bamboo or counterfeit....just questionable.

Why do you think that is?
ADreamOfLiberty said:
It is that people have admitted to taking money to give a ballot to harvesters.
Click to expand...
Who was that? Was this the people who made up bullshit stories that were the basis of 2000 Mules?

BTW, it's legal in California to take as many ballots as you want to drop boxes for other people. It's illegal to take money for it, but taking money wouldn't make the ballot illegal. It would still be counted.
ADreamOfLiberty said:
It is that seniors who are clearly not of the cognizance to be politically active citizens are used as puppets, this I observed personally when I served as an election judge to top the mountain of evidence available (just on that subject) to those who are honest enough to look for it.
Click to expand...
You have no evidence of this happening on any scale that matters. Just like double voting, illegal registering, non-citozens voting, felons voting, etc, I'm sure some meaningless number of seniors are taken advantage of. It's not happening on a scale that would ever change the outcome of an election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top