And has a conservative bias which leads it directly to all the wackiest conspricy theories.In part, it's sweeping up information from Wikipedia, Facebook, Instagram, Redditt to compose answers.
And has a conservative bias which leads it directly to all the wackiest conspricy theories.In part, it's sweeping up information from Wikipedia, Facebook, Instagram, Redditt to compose answers.
It certainly is.Whether he is or not, anecdotal claims are not evidence.
They will be poor amd starving.
And has a conservative bias which leads it directly to all the wackiest conspricy theories.
What 'bailout'??Dotcom was a pump and dump scam. Old timers invested in delivery companies. My point is market makers learned how to keep the AI scam going without having to ask for a bailout.
It certainly is.
Perhaps you think 'evidence' means 'proof'?
The Democrat party is a conspiracy. It is no theory.And has a conservative bias which leads it directly to all the wackiest conspricy theories.
What happened to that Iranian guy?OIC. That was your point, was it?
There are things far worse than death...
You don't know?What 'bailout'??
English is an open functional system, so no proof is possible; however:Prove it.
You seemed to have used 'evidence' in that way. This is actually a rather common a mistake. It's an easy trap to fall into. Democrats use 'evidence' to mean 'proof' all the time. So do fundamentalists. This is why this misuse of the term is so pervasive.Perhaps I don't.
No. What 'bailout'?You don't know?
English is an open functional system, so no proof is possible; however:
The word 'evidence' first entered the English lexicon around 1300, stemming from French. It means an appearance from which inferences may be drawn. It is not a proof. It is simply a supporting statement, objects or characters that support a statement (such as a measurement), including any book, magazine, website,etc.
Evidence is not a proof.
A proof is only possible in a closed functional system, such as mathematics or logic.
You seemed to have used 'evidence' in that way. This is actually a rather common a mistake. It's an easy trap to fall into. Democrats use 'evidence' to mean 'proof' all the time. So do fundamentalists. This is why this misuse of the term is so pervasive.
Democrats also like to deny evidence, but they cannot make it go away or simply disappear. It's still there. Remember that 'evidence' does not mean 'proof', but Democrats typically misuse the term this way.
The related proof in logic:
?A->A (proof of identity)
I saw the whole thing play out. Google will help you figure it out.No. What 'bailout'?
I saw the whole thing play out.
Google will help you figure it out.
That would be one of them. Being a peon who has to live under Leftist rule would be even worse.Being a leftist?
That would be one of them. Being a peon who has to live under Leftist rule would be even worse.
But the chip they put in you prevents that...I would rather die, so . . .
But the chip they put in you prevents that...![]()