This book exists, believe it or not

No that is a stupid take.

The argument i am making here is why a gay person or a black person should be allowed to live and let live like a white person, free of government coersion or their ability to pursue 'life, liberty and their pursuit of happiness'.
Since you don't want them to, that's YOUR problem, Kewpie.
Society USED TO STAND FOR blocking black people, via force of law, from interacting in society in the way white people could.
Democrats.
Society USED TO STAND FOR blocking gay people, via force of law, from interacting in society in the way heterosexuals could.
Not possible. I guess mommy and daddy never told you how sex works.
You are correct when you say 'society stood for ...things'.

But you are wrong to not see that the Constitution tells society and gov't to STAY THE FUCK OUT and not just say, as you want to 'I stand for something as society and thus blacks and gay can and should be limited'.
No such phrase in the Constitution. You hate the Constitution. DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!
That is bigotry Terry.
Inversion fallacy.
That is anti US Constitution.
You.
That makes you wrong Terry. And simply saying 'but i, and society get to stand for something' does not and should not give you that power.

You can't blame your problem on T.A. Gardner or anybody else. Inversion fallacy.
 
No that is a stupid take.

The argument i am making here is why a gay person or a black person should be allowed to live and let live like a white person, free of government coersion or their ability to pursue 'life, liberty and their pursuit of happiness'.

Society USED TO STAND FOR blocking black people, via force of law, from interacting in society in the way white people could.

Society USED TO STAND FOR blocking gay people, via force of law, from interacting in society in the way heterosexuals could.

You are correct when you say 'society stood for ...things'.

But you are wrong to not see that the Constitution tells society and gov't to STAY THE FUCK OUT and not just say, as you want to 'I stand for something as society and thus blacks and gay can and should be limited'.

That is bigotry Terry. That is anti US Constitution. That makes you wrong Terry. And simply saying 'but i, and society get to stand for something' does not and should not give you that power.
Oh, so now comes the special pleadings. Gays and Blacks are allowed to live and let live like Whites. What you really are saying here is that they should get special consideration like special conditions for marriage, or for criminal hearings in a court because they are somehow differentially excepted from the majority.
 
I guess those deaths are fake.

You just make it up as you go, don't you?

The percent of American Teens who commit suicide each year is .0276 per 100,000 - or .276%


YOU in attempting to lowball the number, set the rate at 16-20% for trans - literally a thousand time greater than the general public.

I don't know if you were trying for a self-own - but you sure got one.
 
Last edited:
What does the book teaches?

I would be no more qualified than you to espouse on that. But unlike you, am not an ignoramus so will not pretend to know.

Be held liable if children are harmed.

By "bad thought?"

The problem you have is that Biden failed when he attempted to establish "Thought Police."

You book burners can whine, but you don't have the power to silence those who you disagree with, though you desperately want to.

Such is the left.
 
You just make it up as you go, don't you?
I didn't, dumbass. I took it from AI.
The percent of American Teens who commit suicide each year is .0276 per 100,000 - or .276%

Oh wow. You really got me on the figures. I guess that debunks my point.
YOU in attempting to lowball the number at 16-20% for trans - literally a thousand time greater than the general public.
No I am not. I also got the information from AI.
I don't know if you were trying for a self-own - but you sure got one.
I'll let you have the win.

On the correct figures, not the point.
 
Oh, so now comes the special pleadings. Gays and Blacks are allowed to live and let live like Whites. What you really are saying here is that they should get special consideration like special conditions for marriage, or for criminal hearings in a court because they are somehow differentially excepted from the majority.
No.

You are using the arguments of every bigot from every age that assumes people need "Special pleadings" just to be able to pursue their own 'life, liberty and happiness' without Big Government telling them how to do it.

You are the one creating special considerations that 'certain people' must justify why they get to live the life they choose to when you find it wrong or an aboration.

That was NEVER the intent of the Constitution. No one has to convince Terry why they deserve the rights of everyone else via some special pleading. Those rights are SUPPOSED to be the default and if you want to take them away then you need to make the special pleading to demonstrate why.
 
I would be no more qualified than you to espouse on that. But unlike you, am not an ignoramus so will not pretend to know.
Um it's pretty easy to find the summary, the reviews and highlights.
By "bad thought?"

The problem you have is that Biden failed when he attempted to establish "Thought Police."
Huh?
You book burners can whine, but you don't have the power to silence those who you disagree with, though you desperately want to.
Did I say I wanted that book burned?
Such is the left.
Lying is a part of the right.
 
So they just read it for pleasure?

Were they supposed to check in with you? Will you and the party be the hall monitor to approve of what adults are allowed to read?

How democrat of you.

Says the guy who has no clue what the purpose of this book is.

I'm not the one melting down because a book exists that doesn't serve the agenda.

If you don't like the book Comrade, don't buy it.
 
Were they supposed to check in with you? Will you and the party be the hall monitor to approve of what adults are allowed to read?
What is the reason for parents to read such a book?
How democrat of you.
How Republican of you to state what I want.
I'm not the one melting down because a book exists that doesn't serve the agenda.
What meltdown? If you want to talk about meltdowns, look no further than reactions to LGBT books.
If you don't like the book Comrade, don't buy it.
Not planning to. The summary and the title alone are enough.
 
Um it's pretty easy to find the summary, the reviews and highlights.

Huh?

Did I say I wanted that book burned?

You have no other reason for this meltdown thread. You have found Heresy and want ACTION.

But I can save parents who would otherwise buy the book the cost of it. To cut down the likelihood your child will be gay or trans by 99%, just don't send them to public school.

Lying is a part of the right.

That is a lie - but you do little else, Comrade.
 
You have no other reason for this meltdown thread. You have found Heresy and want ACTION.
What meltdown? What heresy? Links or post numbers.
But I can save parents who would otherwise buy the book the cost of it. To cut down the likelihood your child will be gay or trans by 99%, just don't send them to public school.
But private and Catholic schools are okay to you.
That is a lie - but you do little else, Comrade.
I was mirroring it back to you.
 
What is the reason for parents to read such a book?

No one has to justify why they read what they choose, Comrade.

Book Burners like you always think you have the moral authority to dictate what others may read or know.

You lack the power to enforce your dictates. The Biden Junta did their best to regulate what Americans could read, say, or know - but wasn't able to overcome the 1st Amendment. You of the left keep trying though.

How Republican of you to state what I want.

ROFL

Nice attempt to copy, but you lack the wits for it.

What meltdown? If you want to talk about meltdowns, look no further than reactions to LGBT books.

If I see a thread on an LGBT book aimed at adults that someone wants banned, I'll take note.

However, your whataboutism doesn't change the fact that YOU started this thread to vent your OUTRAGE that such a heretical book would be allowed to exist.

Not planning to. The summary and the title alone are enough.

No, you just want to ban others from buying the book.

No chance I would ever read this, but I think I'll buy a copy just to piss you book burners off.
 
What meltdown? What heresy? Links or post numbers.

But private and Catholic schools are okay to you.

I was mirroring it back to you.

$9.99 on Amazon, Comrade.

You're a great book salesman. I would never ordinarily buy a book like this and undoubtedly disagree with most of it. But $10 to tweak a Nazi book burner is well worth it.
 
No one has to justify why they read what they choose, Comrade.
Um child abuse has zero justification.
Book Burners like you always think you have the moral authority to dictate what others may read or know.
Is there a justification for child abuse?
You lack the power to enforce your dictates. The Biden Junta did their best to regulate what Americans could read, say, or know - but wasn't able to overcome the 1st Amendment. You of the left keep trying though.
You're babbling again.
ROFL

Nice attempt to copy, but you lack the wits for it.



If I see a thread on an LGBT book aimed at adults that someone wants banned, I'll take note.
Again, did I say I wanted this book banned or burned?
However, your whataboutism doesn't change the fact that YOU started this thread to vent your OUTRAGE that such a heretical book would be allowed to exist.
Nope.

Aren't you concerned about the potential child abuse?
No, you just want to ban others from buying the book.
False.
No chance I would ever read this, but I think I'll buy a copy just to piss you book burners off.
Up to you. After reading it, come here and tell us what you think.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top