Into the Night
Contributor
What 'rural unemployed losers', Wally?
You are not productive.
Obviously you have no idea where your power comes from.
Will there be a 2nd American civil war before 28 ?
- Thread starter Stone
- Start date
You are not productive.
Obviously you have no idea where your power comes from.
No. Was at two of those conflicts though. How about you?
Those "rural unemployed losers," as you call us, produce your food, you incompetent fool.
I won't lose anything if you leftists start anything. Cope...
serenity
Verified User
Civil wars are fought when ancestries stop following current events as defined by laws projecting life exceeds time adapting to the moment since personal conception evolving as eternally separated by their own brain navigating space proportionately alive now each heartbeat added since conception.I believe it just may . I give it a 25% chance of happening. If certain economic or political events occur those odds sky rocket upward. How would it go down? The military would overwhelmingly be with US on the right, ex military would most likely skew even higher. LEO would be with US on the right,...same with ex LEO. Yeah,......the left would be totally screwed. And for those of you who think military protocol would all remain the sameYOU ARE DREAMING, its a civil war DUMMIES! That means the fabric of society has totally broken down,.....the military would be no different, they are just people. No, Posse Comitatus wouldn't protect you at all, there would be none.
Date of birth is just a social reference point of which rotation logistically recorded in history one's body left the womb and hasn't arrived in their tomb yet.
No, that would be farmers who produce food. People who live in rural locations because they cannot afford urban locations are not producing food in their mobile homes. In fact, they usually live in different rural locations.
trump does best in rural locations without significant agriculture.
If we stop supporting you, you will die. Do you think there is anyone else in the world lining up to support you?
Here is a little quiz: how many consulates have contacted you about moving to their country? My guess is it is zero.
Wow we certainly hope so, fat boy - so we can watch you shit yourself as you hide underneath your My Pretty Pony sleigh-bed in your mom's basement!I believe it just may . I give it a 25% chance of happening. If certain economic or political events occur those odds sky rocket upward. How would it go down? The military would overwhelmingly be with US on the right, ex military would most likely skew even higher. LEO would be with US on the right,...same with ex LEO. Yeah,......the left would be totally screwed. And for those of you who think military protocol would all remain the same
Last edited:
100%. That fat goon takes "stupid" to an entirely new level. Did you see him suggesting we "nuke" Iran? There should be a rudimentary intelligence test to join this forum - fat-boy would never make the cut.
You're misunderstanding who is going to kill your kind, Walt.
It's likely to be the criminals that Democrats coddle.
Once the left succeeds in defunding the police and abolishing prisons, what do you think the thieves, rapists, and murderer are going to do?
Once again, I doubt anyone is going to kill my kind... But if they do, I have a very good understanding who they are.
Democrats brought crime to record lows, while Republicans keep excusing white criminals.
Go on doubting it. I hope it happens, and soon.
I don't believe that you do. Career criminals freed from prison and unconstrained by effective police are unlikely to spare you because you voted for the policies that allowed them to walk free are they?
Walt claims that "Democrats brought crime to record lows, while Republicans keep excusing white criminals."
The claim is partisan spin that does not hold up to the data. Crime trends are long-term, multi-causal, and not neatly controlled by one party’s presidents or local officials. The second half of the statement is a selective, racialized framing that ignores the actual patterns of offending and victimization.
Redefinition, reclassification, charge reductions, and non-prosecution policies skew recorded data in measurable ways. They change what gets counted as a reportable Part I offense, what gets charged as a felony versus a misdemeanor, and what appears in official tallies, particularly for aggravated assault, robbery, and property crimes. Local examples of deliberate downgrading exist, statutory changes (such as California’s Prop 47) alter categories, and progressive prosecutorial policies reduce the volume of certain cases that enter the formal system. Those practices introduce downward bias in the police-reported numbers relative to underlying incidents.
That bias is real and relevant when evaluating claims about crime trends under Democrat governance or reform prosecutors.
Crime rates and “record lows”
U.S. violent crime and homicide rates peaked in the early 1990s (homicide around 9.8 per 100,000 in 1991; violent crime near 758 per 100,000) and then fell substantially for roughly two decades under both Democrat and Republican presidents and Congresses. By the mid-to-late 2010s they were far lower. There was a sharp spike in 2020 (homicide up roughly 30% nationally in the largest single-year jump on record), coinciding with the pandemic, urban disorder, reduced policing/prosecution in many places, and related disruptions. Rates then began declining again.
- FBI data show the 2024 national violent crime rate at about 359 per 100,000 (lowest in decades, approaching late-1960s levels) and the homicide rate at 5.0. Preliminary 2025 data indicate further large drops (homicide estimates around 4.0 or lower in some analyses, potentially the lowest in a century or more, with violent crime down ~9% and homicide ~18%).
- The post-2020 decline started during the Biden years (notable drops in 2023–2024) and continued into 2025 under Trump. Both sides claim credit; neither fully owns it. Factors cited by researchers include the end of pandemic disruptions, local policy shifts (some cities walked back soft-on-crime approaches), violence-intervention programs, demographic changes, and improved clearance/policing in places. National policy (federal funding, DOJ priorities, immigration enforcement) plays a role but does not dictate local street-level outcomes. Most large cities are run by Democrats, and many of the biggest recent drops occurred there.
Attributing the long decline or recent lows solely to “Democrats” is false. The big drop of the 1990s–2010s crossed administrations (Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump). The 2020 spike occurred under Trump; the subsequent recovery began under Biden. Claims of pure partisan causation ignore the evidence.
“Republicans keep excusing white criminals”
This is a rhetorical accusation, not a balanced description of crime data or political behavior.
FBI arrest and offender data consistently show large disparities: Black Americans (≈13–14% of the population) account for a disproportionate share of arrests for murder, robbery, and other violent crimes (often 50%+ of known murder offenders in recent years, with similar patterns for robbery). White Americans account for the majority of overall arrests in absolute numbers (as the larger population group) but lower rates for the most serious violent offenses. Most violent crime is intra-racial. Black Americans are also disproportionately victims of homicide.
Both parties engage in selective emphasis:
- Progressive prosecutors, bail reforms, and “defund”/reimagine-policing rhetoric in many Democrat cities and states reduced consequences for certain offenders (disproportionately affecting high-crime urban areas).
- Neither party systematically “excuses white criminals” as a group, nor is that the dominant pattern in enforcement data. Crime policy debates often get racialized because of the underlying statistical disparities in offending and victimization.
In short: crime is down substantially from the 1990s peak and has fallen further recently after the 2020 spike. The trend is real and welcome, but it is not a Democrat achievement exclusive of other factors or administrations. Framing the other side as uniquely soft on “white criminals” is inverse racial politics that sidesteps the actual distribution of serious violent crime. Primary sources (FBI UCR/NIBRS, CDC vital statistics, NCVS, and independent trackers like the Council on Criminal Justice) are the place to start rather than partisan slogans.
QP!
Verified User
STFU up you raging hypocrite.
You sit back and watch Trump, in his two terms turning America's farmers into permanent welfare recipients and he destroys their markets and greatly increases their costs and you SAY NOTHING as your cult loyalty to Trump demands you pay fealty to him over speaking up for farmers.
Trump's aggressive tariff regimes, retaliatory trade actions from nations like China, and shifting federal spending have driven down export markets and spiked input costs, leading to multi-billion-dollar agricultural losses and a great diminishing of the Farming industry. They have tried to offset that with massive federal bailout packages that offset a portion of those deficits. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Trade and Tariffs
- Lost Export Markets: Aggressive import taxes and trade fights led major buyers like China to place heavy retaliatory duties on U.S. goods, causing soybean and crop exports to plunge and leaving farmers without critical overseas buyers. [1, 2]
Federal Bailouts and Assistance
- Multi-Billion Dollar Aid: The federal government stepped in with tens of billions of dollars in ad-hoc trade aid and direct financial relief payments distributed through the U.S. Department of Agriculture to help offset trade-related damage. [1]
Yakuda
Verified User
Whatever you say dipshit. You're so fucking retarded
As of the latest available FEC data (through June 30, 2026):
- DNC: Approximately $16.3 million cash on hand and $18.5 million in debt (net position roughly $2.2 million negative).
- RNC: Approximately $128.5 million cash on hand and zero debt.
The DNC has carried more debt than cash for months. It took out a $15 million line of credit in 2025 (with terms allowing another $5 million) that used its Washington headquarters as collateral—the largest such off-year loan for the committee. Officials have described this as routine (similar arrangements occurred in prior cycles), though the timing and size drew scrutiny given the overall cash position.
Where do you think farmers live, you ignorant fool?
I didn't mention Trump
You don't support me, Walt. I made a living on my own without the help of idiots like you.
No, none have. I would tell them to fuck off, just like I'm telling you.
He doesn't "think". He just makes shit up and posts it.
SO you are against Tariffs and the Iraq war?
I made my own way through life and support our local farmers, you ignorant and thoughtless little Pee Pee...
QP!
Verified User
yes we all know how you magats give your "support" thru "thoughts and prayers" as you put military weapons of war into the mentally ill's hands to kill ever more kids, and as Trump, gets the US into another 'forever war with American soldiers dying', and in his two terms does more damage to Farmers than arguably all the other POTUS in our lifetime while throwing welfare at them as he destroys their farms.
I made my own way through life and support our local farmers, you ignorant and thoughtless little Pee Pee...
But here is low IQ Rusty standing by the side saying 'but i support you... thoughts and prayers', while he fully empowers Trump to continue to destroy them.
Last edited: