Americans are hunting for coupons and skipping favorite foods to keep up with grocery prices

Is Donald Trump to blame for inflation and grocery prices?





No. The major inflation surge and the bulk of the rise in grocery prices were not caused by Donald Trump.

The sharpest increase occurred in 2021–2022 under the Biden administration, driven primarily by pandemic-related supply disruptions, large fiscal stimulus, accommodative monetary policy, and energy shocks.

Presidents influence inflation indirectly through fiscal policy, regulation, and trade measures, but they do not control it the way the Federal Reserve does via monetary policy.


Timeline of the inflation spike​


  • Trump first term (2017–early 2021): Inflation was low and stable, averaging roughly 1.8–2.4% annually for most years, with a dip to about 1.2% in 2020 amid the pandemic shutdown.
  • Biden term: CPI rose from ~1.4% in early 2021 to a peak of 9.1% in June 2022 (highest in four decades). Food-at-home (grocery) prices jumped especially hard in 2021–2022 (food overall up ~11% in 2022). Cumulative price levels remain substantially higher than pre-pandemic.
  • Recent period (2025–mid-2026, Trump second term): Inflation moderated then rose again. Latest figures show CPI around 3.4% year-over-year in July 2026 (down slightly from 3.5% in June), with food prices up about 3.0% and food-at-home up ~2.7%. Energy (especially gasoline) drove much of the 2026 uptick after a Middle East conflict disrupted oil flows. Core inflation has been stickier in the 2.5–3% range. Overall prices have risen further since January 2025 (roughly 4–5% cumulatively in some measures), but the rate of increase has generally been lower than the 2021–2023 peak.

Grocery prices (food at home) rose most dramatically in 2021–2023 and have not returned to pre-2021 levels. Specific items (eggs, beef, coffee, etc.) have been volatile due to avian flu, cattle supply, weather/droughts, and other factors; some have fallen from recent peaks while others continued rising.

In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump lacked authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The Court held that IEEPA’s language authorizing the president to “regulate…importation” during a national emergency does not include the power to impose tariffs (a form of taxation that the Constitution assigns primarily to Congress).


This decision invalidated the major “Liberation Day”/reciprocal tariffs and related trafficking tariffs imposed in 2025 on nearly all countries (and specifically higher ones on Canada, Mexico, and China). Lower courts (Court of International Trade and Federal Circuit) had already ruled against those IEEPA-based tariffs earlier; the Supreme Court affirmed the core holding. Refund processes for billions collected under those tariffs have been underway, with ongoing disputes about the scope and mechanics of repayments.


Main causes of the 2021–2022 surge​


Economists across the spectrum broadly agree on a combination of factors rather than a single cause or administration:


  • Supply shocks: COVID lockdowns and restrictions disrupted global supply chains, semiconductors, ports, and manufacturing. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 spiked energy and food commodity prices.
  • Demand surge from fiscal stimulus: Multiple large packages (CARES Act under Trump in 2020, December 2020 package, and the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan under Biden in March 2021) injected trillions into the economy while supply was constrained. This boosted demand for goods just as production lagged.
  • Monetary policy: The Federal Reserve kept rates near zero and expanded its balance sheet aggressively into 2021, supporting demand. The Fed later raised rates sharply to fight inflation. Central banks ultimately control the money supply and inflation over the medium term; fiscal policy can add pressure that the Fed must respond to.

Presidents shape the fiscal environment (spending, taxes, deficits) and can affect specific costs via energy policy, regulation, labor rules, or tariffs. They do not set interest rates or the money supply.


Current context and Trump’s policies​


In 2025–2026, tariffs have been cited as putting upward pressure on some goods prices, and energy prices rose sharply due to geopolitical conflict.

Food inflation has continued at a moderate pace rather than reversing.

Cumulative grocery costs remain elevated relative to pre-pandemic or early-2021 levels, which is what households feel most acutely—even when the year-over-year rate slows.

Prices rarely fall in absolute terms once they rise (deflation is uncommon outside specific categories or recessions).

Blaming one president for complex, multi-year, multi-factor inflation (especially the 2021–2022 episode) oversimplifies.

The same applies to claims that any single administration fully “fixed” or “caused” grocery prices.

Monetary policy, global supply conditions, energy markets, and large fiscal interventions were the dominant drivers of the big run-up.

Ongoing elevated levels reflect that ratchet effect plus later shocks.



 
Is Donald Trump to blame for inflation and grocery prices?





No. The major inflation surge and the bulk of the rise in grocery prices were not caused by Donald Trump.

The sharpest increase occurred in 2021–2022 under the Biden administration, driven primarily by pandemic-related supply disruptions, large fiscal stimulus, accommodative monetary policy, and energy shocks.

Presidents influence inflation indirectly through fiscal policy, regulation, and trade measures, but they do not control it the way the Federal Reserve does via monetary policy.


Timeline of the inflation spike​


  • Trump first term (2017–early 2021): Inflation was low and stable, averaging roughly 1.8–2.4% annually for most years, with a dip to about 1.2% in 2020 amid the pandemic shutdown.
  • Biden term: CPI rose from ~1.4% in early 2021 to a peak of 9.1% in June 2022 (highest in four decades). Food-at-home (grocery) prices jumped especially hard in 2021–2022 (food overall up ~11% in 2022). Cumulative price levels remain substantially higher than pre-pandemic.
  • Recent period (2025–mid-2026, Trump second term): Inflation moderated then rose again. Latest figures show CPI around 3.4% year-over-year in July 2026 (down slightly from 3.5% in June), with food prices up about 3.0% and food-at-home up ~2.7%. Energy (especially gasoline) drove much of the 2026 uptick after a Middle East conflict disrupted oil flows. Core inflation has been stickier in the 2.5–3% range. Overall prices have risen further since January 2025 (roughly 4–5% cumulatively in some measures), but the rate of increase has generally been lower than the 2021–2023 peak.

Grocery prices (food at home) rose most dramatically in 2021–2023 and have not returned to pre-2021 levels. Specific items (eggs, beef, coffee, etc.) have been volatile due to avian flu, cattle supply, weather/droughts, and other factors; some have fallen from recent peaks while others continued rising.

In February 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump lacked authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs. The Court held that IEEPA’s language authorizing the president to “regulate…importation” during a national emergency does not include the power to impose tariffs (a form of taxation that the Constitution assigns primarily to Congress).


This decision invalidated the major “Liberation Day”/reciprocal tariffs and related trafficking tariffs imposed in 2025 on nearly all countries (and specifically higher ones on Canada, Mexico, and China). Lower courts (Court of International Trade and Federal Circuit) had already ruled against those IEEPA-based tariffs earlier; the Supreme Court affirmed the core holding. Refund processes for billions collected under those tariffs have been underway, with ongoing disputes about the scope and mechanics of repayments.


Main causes of the 2021–2022 surge​


Economists across the spectrum broadly agree on a combination of factors rather than a single cause or administration:


  • Supply shocks: COVID lockdowns and restrictions disrupted global supply chains, semiconductors, ports, and manufacturing. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 spiked energy and food commodity prices.
  • Demand surge from fiscal stimulus: Multiple large packages (CARES Act under Trump in 2020, December 2020 package, and the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan under Biden in March 2021) injected trillions into the economy while supply was constrained. This boosted demand for goods just as production lagged.
  • Monetary policy: The Federal Reserve kept rates near zero and expanded its balance sheet aggressively into 2021, supporting demand. The Fed later raised rates sharply to fight inflation. Central banks ultimately control the money supply and inflation over the medium term; fiscal policy can add pressure that the Fed must respond to.

Presidents shape the fiscal environment (spending, taxes, deficits) and can affect specific costs via energy policy, regulation, labor rules, or tariffs. They do not set interest rates or the money supply.


Current context and Trump’s policies​


In 2025–2026, tariffs have been cited as putting upward pressure on some goods prices, and energy prices rose sharply due to geopolitical conflict.

Food inflation has continued at a moderate pace rather than reversing.

Cumulative grocery costs remain elevated relative to pre-pandemic or early-2021 levels, which is what households feel most acutely—even when the year-over-year rate slows.

Prices rarely fall in absolute terms once they rise (deflation is uncommon outside specific categories or recessions).

Blaming one president for complex, multi-year, multi-factor inflation (especially the 2021–2022 episode) oversimplifies.

The same applies to claims that any single administration fully “fixed” or “caused” grocery prices.

Monetary policy, global supply conditions, energy markets, and large fiscal interventions were the dominant drivers of the big run-up.

Ongoing elevated levels reflect that ratchet effect plus later shocks.



Nearly every fucking economist on the planet told Trump tariffs are inflationary. Do you shop for groceries? You cannot obfuscate reality away.
 
Shooting a fucking worthless feral cat is now a felony, thanks to Trump.

Who told you that?

Is "shooting feral cats now a felony, thanks to Trump"?



No.


There is no federal or widespread new law making “shooting feral cats” a felony specifically "thanks to Trump" (or any recent administration change framed that way). The claim is false or heavily misleading.


Shooting or intentionally killing feral/stray cats is already illegal in nearly all U.S. jurisdictions under longstanding state animal cruelty statutes. These laws protect domestic cats (including unowned, feral, or community cats) in all 50 states and D.C.


Intentional unjustified killing is typically a misdemeanor; aggravated cases involving malice, torture, prolonged suffering, or priors can be charged as felonies, with penalties ranging from fines and up to a year in jail (misdemeanor) to multi-year prison terms and higher fines (felony). Local firearms discharge bans often apply as well, especially in populated areas. Ownership status rarely creates a free pass—courts and statutes generally treat cats as domestic animals regardless.


The main federal law in this area is the Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act, signed by President Trump in November 2019. It made certain extreme acts of animal cruelty (purposely crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating, impaling, or similarly subjecting animals to serious bodily injury) a federal felony when they occur on federal property, in special maritime/territorial jurisdiction, or in/affecting interstate or foreign commerce. Penalties can include up to 7 years in prison and substantial fines. It does not broadly criminalize ordinary shooting of feral cats in typical local/private settings, and it includes exceptions for customary agricultural, veterinary, hunting, pest control, and similar practices. It built on earlier limited federal rules (e.g., animal fighting and crush-video bans) and was bipartisan. State laws remain the primary tool for most backyard or local incidents.


There is no evidence of a recent Trump-era (or other) federal change that newly elevated shooting of feral cats to felony status nationwide.


Prosecutions and stronger state felony provisions for animal cruelty have expanded over decades through state legislatures and courts (e.g., some states clarifying that feral cats are covered), not a single federal “thanks to Trump” shift targeted at shooting. Extreme or publicized cases (shootings followed by mutilation, etc.) can and do result in serious state charges under existing laws.


In short: Killing feral cats without legal justification has long been prosecutable as animal cruelty (often escalating to felony level in serious cases). The PACT Act added a federal option for the worst extreme methods under limited jurisdictional conditions, but it does not match the claim’s framing. Local animal control, TNR programs, or permitted wildlife management (where applicable and authorized) are the usual legal avenues for dealing with problem populations rather than private lethal force. Laws vary by state and locality; check specific statutes for any given place.



 
Who told you that?

Is "shooting feral cats now a felony, thanks to Trump"?



No.


There is no federal or widespread new law making “shooting feral cats” a felony specifically "thanks to Trump" (or any recent administration change framed that way). The claim is false or heavily misleading.


Shooting or intentionally killing feral/stray cats is already illegal in nearly all U.S. jurisdictions under longstanding state animal cruelty statutes. These laws protect domestic cats (including unowned, feral, or community cats) in all 50 states and D.C.


Intentional unjustified killing is typically a misdemeanor; aggravated cases involving malice, torture, prolonged suffering, or priors can be charged as felonies, with penalties ranging from fines and up to a year in jail (misdemeanor) to multi-year prison terms and higher fines (felony). Local firearms discharge bans often apply as well, especially in populated areas. Ownership status rarely creates a free pass—courts and statutes generally treat cats as domestic animals regardless.


The main federal law in this area is the Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act, signed by President Trump in November 2019. It made certain extreme acts of animal cruelty (purposely crushing, burning, drowning, suffocating, impaling, or similarly subjecting animals to serious bodily injury) a federal felony when they occur on federal property, in special maritime/territorial jurisdiction, or in/affecting interstate or foreign commerce. Penalties can include up to 7 years in prison and substantial fines. It does not broadly criminalize ordinary shooting of feral cats in typical local/private settings, and it includes exceptions for customary agricultural, veterinary, hunting, pest control, and similar practices. It built on earlier limited federal rules (e.g., animal fighting and crush-video bans) and was bipartisan. State laws remain the primary tool for most backyard or local incidents.


There is no evidence of a recent Trump-era (or other) federal change that newly elevated shooting of feral cats to felony status nationwide.


Prosecutions and stronger state felony provisions for animal cruelty have expanded over decades through state legislatures and courts (e.g., some states clarifying that feral cats are covered), not a single federal “thanks to Trump” shift targeted at shooting. Extreme or publicized cases (shootings followed by mutilation, etc.) can and do result in serious state charges under existing laws.


In short: Killing feral cats without legal justification has long been prosecutable as animal cruelty (often escalating to felony level in serious cases). The PACT Act added a federal option for the worst extreme methods under limited jurisdictional conditions, but it does not match the claim’s framing. Local animal control, TNR programs, or permitted wildlife management (where applicable and authorized) are the usual legal avenues for dealing with problem populations rather than private lethal force. Laws vary by state and locality; check specific statutes for any given place.




OK, it wasn't Trump.
But still, (getting caught) shooting them is against the law and can constitute a felony.
I have refrained from using them for target practice.
 
OK, it wasn't Trump. But still, (getting caught) shooting them is against the law and can constitute a felony. I have refrained from using them for target practice.


But for food?

Intentional unjustified killing is typically a misdemeanor; aggravated cases involving malice, torture, prolonged suffering, or priors can be charged as felonies, with penalties ranging from fines and up to a year in jail (misdemeanor) to multi-year prison terms and higher fines (felony).

The Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act does not broadly criminalize ordinary shooting of feral cats in typical local/private settings, and it includes exceptions for customary agricultural, veterinary, hunting, pest control, and similar practices.
 
But for food?

Intentional unjustified killing is typically a misdemeanor; aggravated cases involving malice, torture, prolonged suffering, or priors can be charged as felonies, with penalties ranging from fines and up to a year in jail (misdemeanor) to multi-year prison terms and higher fines (felony).

The Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act does not broadly criminalize ordinary shooting of feral cats in typical local/private settings, and it includes exceptions for customary agricultural, veterinary, hunting, pest control, and similar practices.

Who would eat a feral cat? Who knows what diseases they may have?
 
And yet you whined like a little bitch about Biden inflation and the cost of things while you now pretend you could not GAF about the cost.

You are a liar and hypocrite. Enjoy your mac and cheese and spam, you whiney bitch.

I said I buy/eat what I want, you incompetent hemorrhoid. I made no mention of the cost.
Yes, inflation under Biden was higher than it has been in the last few years. Look it up.
I like Mac & Cheese, especially if some American cheese is also added. I like it with
baked Haddock. Tell me what I've lied about,,douchenozzle.
 
I said I buy/eat what I want, you incompetent hemorrhoid. I made no mention of the cost.
Yes, inflation under Biden was higher than it has been in the last few years. Look it up.
I like Mac & Cheese, especially if some American cheese is also added. I like it with
baked Haddock. Tell me what I've lied about,,douchenozzle.
It's seems like you're one of the few who seems to think that Crazy Trump has improved the inflation situation.
 
Back
Top