The most secure election ever and other lies.

Meaningless. You haven't answered the question, because you are lying about acknowledging that humans conspire.

You have forfeited until you answer the question.
There's nothing to answer. You are the dishonest one who's creating a false choice between a) believing your conspiracy theory or b) believing nobody conspires.
 
There's nothing to answer.
Yes, there is. I asked the question several times. I'll ask it again here:

Do you accept any theories of human conspiracy, or do you deny that humans ever conspire?

Anytime you want to come out of forfeit and actually compete, you can answer the question before you.
 
Yes, there is. I asked the question several times. I'll ask it again here:

Do you accept any theories of human conspiracy, or do you deny that humans ever conspire?
And I've said a half dozen times, or more, that humans do conspire.

Now, without circular reasoning, or stacking conspiracy theories on top of conspiracy theories, why SPECIFICALLY do you believe that multiple federal government agencies are conspiring to cover up the claims in the affidavit we're talking about?
 
And I've said a half dozen times, [ I will EVADE your question because you've got me cornered and I dare not admit that I have lost this one ]
FTFY. I see that you would rather forfeit than face a humiliating defeat.

To suffer a humiliating defeat instead of simply forfeiting, just answer the question "Do you accept any theories of human conspiracy, or do you deny that humans ever conspire?"
 
FTFY. I see that you would rather forfeit than face a humiliating defeat.

To suffer a humiliating defeat instead of simply forfeiting, just answer the question "Do you accept any theories of human conspiracy, or do you deny that humans ever conspire?"
lol... I have no idea what you're talking about, but I will try to answer a CLEARLY as humanly possible so that we can move on to you explaining your beliefs.

You said: "Do you accept any theories of human conspiracy, or do you deny that humans ever conspire?"

As I've said, yes, there are established instances of human conspiracy. Whether or not I accept "theories of human conspiracy" depends on the details of each individual situation.

For example, I have no reason to believe that Trump conspired with Putin/Russia relating to the 2016 election. However, I do believe the former execs of Enron conspired, individually and together, to commit securities fraud.

Now, without circular reasoning, or stacking conspiracy theories on top of conspiracy theories, why SPECIFICALLY do you believe that multiple federal government agencies conspired to cover up the claims in the affidavit we're talking about?
 
Last edited:
Whether or not I accept "theories of human conspiracy" depends on the details of each individual situation.
You're getting closer to answering the question. Let's bring you over the finish line.

Are there any theories of human conspiracy that you accept or do you reject them all?
 
Yes there are what? Can you write in complete answers? How am I supposed to quote you? Make a full statement about how you accept some conspiracy theories so that you can be quoted.
I thought that conspiracy theories originated with you, for example stolen elections.
 
I thought that conspiracy theories originated with you, for example stolen elections.
The DNC certainly conspired for four years to pull it off. You saw it happen, didn't you? Trump won by a landslide, but they just couldn't call the election in his favor on election night as they did in every other election, nooooooo. They had to go behind closed doors for days, fabricating votes, and fabricating votes, and fabricating votes, ... giving us periodic updates as to how Biden was catching up, until the announcement came that Biden had finally secured enough fabricated votes for the election to be called in his favor.

None of that is theory, by the way. All of that was observation. Call me a conspiracy observationalist, and we'll call you a conspiracy denialist.
 
It was some Republicans working for Trump who told him it was the most secure election ever. Anyone working on it knew that to be true, Trump's chief of cybersecurity ,Krebs,explained to Trump that it was fair and his claims about election anomalies were incorrect. Trump fired him.
 
Yes there are what? Can you write in complete answers? How am I supposed to quote you? Make a full statement about how you accept some conspiracy theories so that you can be quoted.
The phrase 'conspiracy theory' means something specific. It's not just a way to reference a theory of conspiracy/collusion.
 
The phrase 'conspiracy theory' means something specific. It's not just a way to reference a theory of conspiracy/collusion.
I speak English. I know what the words mean.

Do you accept any theories of human conspiracy or do you reject them all? This question should be too easy to answer, unless you are EVADING for a forfeit.
 
The DNC certainly conspired for four years to pull it off. You saw it happen, didn't you? Trump won by a landslide, but they just couldn't call the election in his favor on election night as they did in every other election, nooooooo. They had to go behind closed doors for days, fabricating votes, and fabricating votes, and fabricating votes, ... giving us periodic updates as to how Biden was catching up, until the announcement came that Biden had finally secured enough fabricated votes for the election to be called in his favor.

None of that is theory, by the way. All of that was observation. Call me a conspiracy observationalist, and we'll call you a conspiracy denialist.
What you posted is 100% in delulu land.
 
I speak English. I know what the words mean.

Do you accept any theories of human conspiracy or do you reject them all? This question should be too easy to answer, unless you are EVADING for a forfeit.
Yes, and I already gave an example of a theory of human conspiracy that I accept as true.

I don't accept all or reject all, blindly.

If you ask again, I'll respond with the same answer.
 
Back
Top