Reuters: a member of the TNI lairs, from the early days when they were pushing false narratives about covid/Hunter laptop and their social media members (Microsoft, FB, Twitter, Google, YouTube) were blocking facts about those things on social media, and even giving bans to people who talked about them. Remember when the NYPost got banned from social media for saying thngs that the FBI knew to be true at the time? That was TNI, and Reuters was part of TNI.
Take a moment to reflect on the fact that Reuters/NYT/WashPo/Associated Press were part of a global news cabal that banned NYPost from social media for telling the truth... Is that not alarming?
Every part of what I said is 100% verified and factual, and I can prove anything that you doubt.
Polling "Data":
What's the difference between 1) Telling a lie, and 2) Telling a lie with a number beside it?
Nothing, but the second one is more convincing. Right?
And do you think that liars will refrain from telling lies
with numbers beside them? No, they will not.
Polling Data and "Twitter likes and re-tweets":
Before Elon bought Twitter, and J Dorsey was running it, Twitter was using shadow bans and outright bans to push false TNI narratives, such as "We know the zoonotic origin theory is the only likely candidate", and their algorithms were also pushing TNI's false narratives to the forefront, making them more likely to be seen while more accurate information was bumped down.
Not only that,
a legion of bots was also "liking and sharing" content that Twitter wanted to popularize, and TNI narratives were at the forefront of that.
For that reason, whenever Hillary or another popular leftist said anything, their posts quickly got tens of thousands of "likes and shares" from bot accounts, lending the posts an air of credibility and popularity that was false.
And that's why, if you recall, MSM outlets were constantly citing the number of
likes and shares that certain posts got on Twitter.
Eg: "Hillary said "blah blah blah" and her post was liked and shared by over TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND PEOPLE!!!!
" OMH she is so popular right now.
Well, now Elon owns Twitter (X) and the bot army is gone, so the BS "likes and re-tweets" no longer exist, and therefor polling data is all they've got.
Do you think that the group that was citing fake likes and re-tweets is above citing fake polling data? Of course not.
How "Polling "Data" is Used:
CNN et al can't openly say "We just love Kamala so we want you to believe this is true", but what they can do is show a video of someone talking (lying) and then refer to BS polling data that says "The cool kids all think this guy is legit." And it works.
Don't you find it odd that polling data always shows what CNN wants it to show, and that only elections go against the grain?
Examples of fake polling data:
Before the last 3 elections in the USA and the last 3 in Canada, the leftist parties led by 5-7% for the entire last month of the campaigns, and then suddenly on the last weekend, for no apparent reason, the polls shifted by the millions, down to only +1.5%.
No great reason was cited, it just magically happened. 6 times in a row.
then the elections happened and sometimes the conservatives even won the popular vote. That means that the polling data from 1 week before the election, at say 6%, was off by about 7-8% in some instances. But it was only off the polling "data" from the weekend by 0-3%. So the weekend polling data was not that bad, hey?
But the effect of telling people "THIS IS POPULAR" for 30 days straight effects the outcome of an election to a great extent.
The polling data that you are shown is BS. Always. FYI CNN doesn't show you polling data to give you accurate information, they do it to control what you think about important topics.
