I don't think I have a rule against that at this time.
As I said, they are ok w protecting pedophiles.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Yakuda
Verified User
There are more trump threads on this site than any leftist has brains cells
They really redefine the words "cognitive dissonance".
They do not care if he is a pedo, they love it. If definitive proof came out that Trump was with young girls, they would be okay with it. "I dont care, I like that he owns libs."
This seems to be true.
And your statistics for this babble ?
No, he claimed all his voters are pedophile protectors... That is different than saying they are pedophiles. Their votes for Team Epstein protects pedophiles.
Epstein gave politically to democrats. And most if not all on his list are democrats or liberals. So your comment about votes for team Epstein is correct.
Last edited:
It keeps them occupied.
Yakuda
Verified User
They should stick to making ashtrays
Fact check the claim that 67.4% of child molesters are Republicans.
The claim is false. “67.4% of child molesters are Republicans” is a misrepresentation of a tiny, non-representative subset of a news-clipping project.
What the number actually is
The figure comes from whoismakingnews.com, a project run by Kristen Browde (a lawyer, TikToker, former Democratic candidate, and transgender activist). She compiles news stories about child sexual assault cases in the U.S. starting mid-February 2023.
In the Data Studio snapshot tied to that site:
- Total recorded offenders: ~10,885
- Cases coded as “politicians”: 89
- Of those 89 with a recorded affiliation: Republican 60, Democratic 12, Unknown 15, Libertarian 2
60 ÷ 89 ≈ 67.4%. That is the entire source of the percentage. It is not 67.4% of child molesters. It is 67.4% of a handful of public figures whose party ID happened to appear in news coverage.
Why this cannot be generalized
- Political affiliation is almost never reported for ordinary offenders. It appears when the person is an elected official, candidate, party officer, or activist. That is a biased, high-visibility slice.
- The project only includes cases that generated news stories. Browde herself estimates that only 1 in 40–50 abuse cases ever get public reporting, and coverage is uneven by locality and outlet.
- There is no systematic matching of sex-offender registries to voter files. No official U.S. dataset tracks party of child sex offenders.
- Browde’s project is explicitly framed as a rebuttal to “right-wing narratives” about drag queens and transgender people. That does not automatically make every number wrong, but it does mean the compilation and presentation are not a neutral census.
State-level per-capita charts on the same site (higher rates in some Republican-leaning states) suffer from the same problems plus ecological fallacy: reporting practices, media density, rural vs. urban coverage, and how states define/report offenses all differ. They do not measure party of individual offenders.
Bottom line
There is no credible evidence that 67.4% of child molesters are Republicans. The statistic describes 60 people out of 89 news-covered politicians in one activist’s clipping file. Child sexual abuse occurs across groups; high-profile cases exist in both parties. Treating a news-selected sliver of politicians as a portrait of all offenders is not fact-checking—it is the opposite.
Fact Check: 67.4% Child Molesters Republicans | Shared Grok Conversation
Fact check the claim that 67.4% of child molesters are Republicans: https://www.whoismakingnews.com/
grok.com
Imagine what horrors they might otherwise be perpetrating if they weren't distracted.
I love how your embarrassment shows.
Typical MAGAT dumbass -- "I support his policies for America." Like unnecessary war, soaring inflation caused by said war plus his illegal tariffs, trade wars, alienation of our allies, shooting American citizens down in the streets, trying to stop mail-in balloting, etc.
First, you come out with a ridiculous accusation with your zero facts to back it up.
" If definitive proof came out" means you have no proof of anything.
Who is 'they' asshole?
WTF does that mean?
A little contradictory, you are.
More importantly, what is wrong in your head?
Yakuda
Verified User
Embarrassment for what? This should be good
How about a second source, not one that was made up by one fruitcake?