RIP Charlie

On gun violence I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational.– Event organized by TPUSA Faith, the religious arm of Kirk’s conservative group Turning Point USA, on 5 April 2023​


I hope that's on his headstone.
 
maxresdefault.jpg


Ya fuckin' piece of shit.
Your upbringing is showing :barf:
 
Karen, give us specifics. Tell us what Trump has implemented from Project 25 that has you so upset.
Read the links, Pruney. There are far too many specifics to enumerate, but increasing the president's power is a big one for me.

"Project 2025 aims to consolidate significant power in the presidency, allowing the president to exert greater control over the executive branch and diminish the independence of various federal agencies. This initiative is seen as a move towards an authoritarian style of governance."

Summary of Risks

Area of ConcernProposed ChangesPotential Impact
Social ServicesCuts to Medicaid and housing benefitsIncreased poverty and homelessness
Rights and ProtectionsRollbacks of LGBTQ rights and educational reformsMarginalization of diverse communities
Government StructurePacking agencies with loyalistsErosion of democratic norms and civil service integrity
These elements highlight the potential for Project 2025 to create significant harm to vulnerable populations and undermine fundamental rights in the United States.


 
Read the links, Pruney. There are far too many specifics to enumerate, but increasing the president's power is a big one for me.

"Project 2025 aims to consolidate significant power in the presidency, allowing the president to exert greater control over the executive branch and diminish the independence of various federal agencies. This initiative is seen as a move towards an authoritarian style of governance."

Summary of Risks

Area of ConcernProposed ChangesPotential Impact
Social ServicesCuts to Medicaid and housing benefitsIncreased poverty and homelessness
Rights and ProtectionsRollbacks of LGBTQ rights and educational reformsMarginalization of diverse communities
Government StructurePacking agencies with loyalistsErosion of democratic norms and civil service integrity
These elements highlight the potential for Project 2025 to create significant harm to vulnerable populations and undermine fundamental rights in the United States.



Where's your evidence that "his administration has implemented many of its goals"?
 
Read the links, Pruney. There are far too many specifics to enumerate, but increasing the president's power is a big one for me.

"Project 2025 aims to consolidate significant power in the presidency, allowing the president to exert greater control over the executive branch and diminish the independence of various federal agencies. This initiative is seen as a move towards an authoritarian style of governance."

Summary of Risks

Area of ConcernProposed ChangesPotential Impact
Social ServicesCuts to Medicaid and housing benefitsIncreased poverty and homelessness
Rights and ProtectionsRollbacks of LGBTQ rights and educational reformsMarginalization of diverse communities
Government StructurePacking agencies with loyalistsErosion of democratic norms and civil service integrity
These elements highlight the potential for Project 2025 to create significant harm to vulnerable populations and undermine fundamental rights in the United States.


Karen, is that all?
 
Where's your evidence that "his administration has implemented many of its goals"?
Fifty-three percent is a small majority, and it's less that two years. Btw, it was in one of the links I gave to Prunella.

Search Assist

About 53% of Project 2025’s domestic administrative policy agenda has been initiated or completed, with 283 of 532 recommended actions carried out as of February 2026.
progressivereform.org
 
About 53% of Project 2025’s domestic administrative policy agenda has been initiated or completed, with 283 of 532 recommended actions carried out as of February 2026.


The 532-item count and “initiated or completed” standard come from advocacy groups opposed to the agenda.

Overlap does not mean every line of the 900-page Mandate for Leadership was adopted verbatim, nor that Trump “followed the book” as a single script. Many items were already Republican priorities or appeared in Agenda 47.

“What the left is doing is a backlash to Trump’s dictatorial actions”​


This is opinion, not a checkable factual claim. Opposition to Project 2025 and to Trump’s second-term personnel and executive actions was already intense during the 2024 campaign. Labeling those actions “dictatorial” is a characterization, not a documented fact that can be verified.
 
Back
Top