I read the Constitution.For the govt to PROTECT those rights not grant them. Read
I read the Constitution.For the govt to PROTECT those rights not grant them. Read
Read the D of I it's a founding document and outlines why a constitution is needed.I read the Constitution.
I have read it.Read the D of I it's a founding document and outlines why a constitution is needed.
Then you either don't care or don't understand it. Where does Jefferson say rights come from?I have read it.
Jefferson did not write the Constitution.Then you either don't care or don't understand it. Where does Jefferson say rights come from?
He wrote the D of I. You said you read it.Jefferson did not write the Constitution.
And?He wrote the D of I. You said you read it.
And you can't answer my question, where does he say rights come from? I'm trying to be respectful but you make it very difficult.And?
Answered. The Declaration has no legal authority.And you can't answer my question, where does he say rights come from? I'm trying to be respectful but you make it very difficult.
Not what I asked. I think you like being insultedAnswered. The Declaration has no legal authority.
No, you ignored my answer. Does not matter what the Declaration says, it was written before there was the United States.Not what I asked. You I think you like being insulted
And you STILL haven't answered the question, where does TJ say rights come from?No, you ignored my answer. Does not matter what the Declaration says, it was written before there was the United States.
And I know more American history than you have the capacity to comprehend.
The Constitution wasn't written to grant rights. It was written to restrict government's ability to infringe on natural rights.Yes they did absolutely. Otherwise, why write a Constitution?
They shouldn't be.
I would lie to Nazis if they asked me if I knew where Jews were hiding, and I did in fact know.
You do less harm to humanity and your conscience blatantly lying to Nazis than you would do by leading them to the hiding places of Jews
Not really, no. That is just the Bill of Rights, amendments.The Constitution wasn't written to grant rights. It was written to restrict government's ability to infringe on natural rights.
How is it an ad hominem?
Hummer's response was Ad Hominem. Perhaps he was just defining what would follow?
Kantians do not agree.
Why?I find it difficult to believe you have ever read Kant