I do not care about your morals.
YOU don't have any of your own.
I do not care about your morals.
Or morals in general, huh? That's why you started this thread. You wanted confirmation of your excuses.I do not care about your morals.
False. Obviously I care because I started this thread.Or morals in general, huh?
fuck off hate trollYOU don't have any of your own.
Mmhmm.False. Obviously I care because I started this thread.
Not interested in talking about abortion.Mmhmm.
What about killing babies in the womb?
It kinda defines morality.Not interested in talking about abortion.
Yes, people like you obsess on it because it is theology. Not interested.It kinda defines morality.
Yep.Yes, people like you obsess on it because it is theology. Not interested.
Of course there are absolute morals. No mentally healthy human being wants to be murdered, rape or enslaved, lied to or cheated.It is exactly that. There are no 'absolute morals'.
No. It is a way of saying you are (or are not) holding yourself accountable. You are accountable to your morals.
There are no 'absolute morals'. Each person establishes their own morals, just as they establish their own reality.
I have already listed them. RQAA.
RQAA.
I never met a guy who's always talking about cock ,who doesn't spend Saturday night on the Down Low!!And you're a faggot that dreams of cock.
Everybody's different, did you have a salient point?
The English language is not an opinion written in English, moron.Nope. That is an opinion written in English.
The English language is not an opinion.An opinion that you won't defend/debate, but will just keep blindly repeating because that's all you've got.
...and your point...? Do you have one?Nor do murderers. But we still have laws.
Mantra 1f. Lame.View attachment 96819
Trump is carrying his chopsticks
Morals is not a lesson.This might get your attention....See Ted Kaczynski's, Ted Bundy's, David Berkowitz's, Lindsay Clancy's, Benjamin Netanyahu's, etc practical lessons in moral relativity.
There is no such thing as 'moral relativists', Hugo. Buzzword fallacy.They are not moral relativists. Clearly you do not understand the concept.
I suppose you could call it that, since morals are subjective. There is no such thing as an object moral.You are describing moral nihilism.
There is no such thing as 'moral relativity'.I'm not....I was speaking of those who think they are, sitting in their gilded cocoons way above the rest of us who make up this queer shyte. Give me one day with them in the Kruger National Park on a woke foot Safari...I will outrun them without looking back and telling them that climbing a tree doesn't help in my lesson of moral relativity.
A nicely concise listing. You do, of course have other morals then this general description.Whatever. Here how my morals work...Family First, Neighbours Second, Village 3rd and all the rest after that I highly critical of, especially when its coming from fancy F$cks in the media and those international Billionaires who own them.
Nothing Relative about it.