Moral relativism

It is exactly that. There are no 'absolute morals'.

No. It is a way of saying you are (or are not) holding yourself accountable. You are accountable to your morals.

There are no 'absolute morals'. Each person establishes their own morals, just as they establish their own reality.

I have already listed them. RQAA.

RQAA.
Of course there are absolute morals. No mentally healthy human being wants to be murdered, rape or enslaved, lied to or cheated.
 
This might get your attention....See Ted Kaczynski's, Ted Bundy's, David Berkowitz's, Lindsay Clancy's, Benjamin Netanyahu's, etc practical lessons in moral relativity.
Morals is not a lesson.
Each of these people you listed have their own morals, just as you have yours.
 
They are not moral relativists. Clearly you do not understand the concept.
There is no such thing as 'moral relativists', Hugo. Buzzword fallacy.
There is no such thing as 'moral absolutists' either.

Morals are created by each individual. There are no absolute morals.
 
I'm not....I was speaking of those who think they are, sitting in their gilded cocoons way above the rest of us who make up this queer shyte. Give me one day with them in the Kruger National Park on a woke foot Safari...I will outrun them without looking back and telling them that climbing a tree doesn't help in my lesson of moral relativity.
There is no such thing as 'moral relativity'.
 
Whatever. Here how my morals work...Family First, Neighbours Second, Village 3rd and all the rest after that I highly critical of, especially when its coming from fancy F$cks in the media and those international Billionaires who own them.

Nothing Relative about it.
A nicely concise listing. You do, of course have other morals then this general description.
 
Back
Top