Moral relativism

And that is philosophical. Not about politics. Which you constantly lie about.
Chicken/egg - Philosophy/politics.

Either way, the belief that cutting off a 13 year olds clitoris could be moral is horribly misguided and based on flawed philosophy, politics or some combination of both.
 
Chicken/egg - Philosophy/politics.

Either way, the belief that cutting off a 13 year olds clitoris could be moral is horribly misguided and based on flawed philosophy, politics or some combination of both.
Again, my intention for this thread was not a disguised plea for left wing ideology. I thought you were joking at first.
 
we have the ten commandments and the golden rule.

shut your dumb gay ass.
we have the ten commandments and the golden rule.

shut your dumb gay ass.
Nobody could keep those!That's why Jesus went to Plan B! The Cross!
Have you always been a homophobic? Or just on the Down Low?
I'm bigender,not "gay"! Although being Bigender pretty much guarantees you will be Bisexual!
 

Moral Relativism​

Though many philosophers are quite critical of moral relativism, there are several contemporary philosophers who defend forms of it. These include such prominent figures as Gilbert Harman, Jesse J. Prinz, J. David Velleman and David B. Wong.

Most often it is associated with an empirical thesis that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements and a metaethical thesis that the truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to the moral standard of some person or group of persons.

 
Nobody could keep those!That's why Jesus went to Plan B! The Cross!
Have you always been a homophobic? Or just on the Down Low?
I'm bigender,not "gay"! Although being Bigender pretty much guarantees you will be Bisexual!
I dont fear your bi-ness.

I wish i could be more flexible.

I only like princessy bitches who hate me.

its an affliction.
 

Moral Relativism​

Though many philosophers are quite critical of moral relativism, there are several contemporary philosophers who defend forms of it. These include such prominent figures as Gilbert Harman, Jesse J. Prinz, J. David Velleman and David B. Wong.

Most often it is associated with an empirical thesis that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements and a metaethical thesis that the truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to the moral standard of some person or group of persons.

Now this is stalking.
 
And answer my question.

Do you believe female genital mutilation is immoral? If yes, why?
tenor.gif


@Into the Night
 

Moral Relativism​

Though many philosophers are quite critical of moral relativism, there are several contemporary philosophers who defend forms of it. These include such prominent figures as Gilbert Harman, Jesse J. Prinz, J. David Velleman and David B. Wong.

Most often it is associated with an empirical thesis that there are deep and widespread moral disagreements and a metaethical thesis that the truth or justification of moral judgments is not absolute, but relative to the moral standard of some person or group of persons.

the proof that its objective is that different person groups come up with the same in-group rules.
 
Back
Top